ОБЪЕКТИВНОЕ ИЛИ ОСНОВАННОЕ НА ВОСПРИЯТИИ? КАЗАХСТАНСКИЕ ДЕБАТЫ О САМОМ ИДЕАЛЬНОМ ИЗМЕРЕНИИ КОРРУПЦИИ

Translated title of the contribution: Objective or perception-based? : A Kazakhstani debate on the most ideal corruption measure

Riccardo Pelizzo, Omer F. Baris, Saltanat Janenova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss several institutions in Kazakhstan decided to develop new
measures of corruption. In doing so attention will be paid to the fact that empirical analyses had raised some doubts as to whether and to what extent existing measures of corruption provided valid and reliable estimates of corruption levels in Kazakhstan. After exploring some explanations as to why international measures failed to provide a proper assessment of corruption in the country, the paper argues that local institutions decided to develop new measures with the hope that could generate better estimates of corruption level across region, across sector and over time.
Translated title of the contributionObjective or perception-based? : A Kazakhstani debate on the most ideal corruption measure
Original languageRussian
Pages (from-to)93
Number of pages112
JournalГосударственное управление и государственная служба
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2016

Keywords

  • Corruption
  • kazakhstan
  • measure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Objective or perception-based? : A Kazakhstani debate on the most ideal corruption measure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this