Abstract
In this paper, diagrammatic systems for logical concept modelling are investigated. These systems include Charles S. Peirce's existential graphs, conceptual graphs, extensive semantic games, and discourse representation theory (DRT). It is argued that the fundamental difference between these systems is that unlike in the other graphical methods of logic, in the theory of extensive semantic games one is able to model concepts that call for some strategic, i.e. game-theoretic deliberations. They are needed among other things in properly understanding the linguistic concept of anaphora and its interplay with negation. Furthermore, it is shown how Peirce's existential graphs transform into extensive semantic games. This has important consequences to the game-theoretic visualisation of logic and semantics and enables one to represent uncertainty in existential graphs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 115-133 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Studies in Multidisciplinarity |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | C |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 1 2005 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Engineering(all)
- General
Cite this
9 Diagrammatic logic and game-playing. / Pietarinen, Ahti Veikko.
In: Studies in Multidisciplinarity, Vol. 2, No. C, 01.12.2005, p. 115-133.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - 9 Diagrammatic logic and game-playing
AU - Pietarinen, Ahti Veikko
PY - 2005/12/1
Y1 - 2005/12/1
N2 - In this paper, diagrammatic systems for logical concept modelling are investigated. These systems include Charles S. Peirce's existential graphs, conceptual graphs, extensive semantic games, and discourse representation theory (DRT). It is argued that the fundamental difference between these systems is that unlike in the other graphical methods of logic, in the theory of extensive semantic games one is able to model concepts that call for some strategic, i.e. game-theoretic deliberations. They are needed among other things in properly understanding the linguistic concept of anaphora and its interplay with negation. Furthermore, it is shown how Peirce's existential graphs transform into extensive semantic games. This has important consequences to the game-theoretic visualisation of logic and semantics and enables one to represent uncertainty in existential graphs.
AB - In this paper, diagrammatic systems for logical concept modelling are investigated. These systems include Charles S. Peirce's existential graphs, conceptual graphs, extensive semantic games, and discourse representation theory (DRT). It is argued that the fundamental difference between these systems is that unlike in the other graphical methods of logic, in the theory of extensive semantic games one is able to model concepts that call for some strategic, i.e. game-theoretic deliberations. They are needed among other things in properly understanding the linguistic concept of anaphora and its interplay with negation. Furthermore, it is shown how Peirce's existential graphs transform into extensive semantic games. This has important consequences to the game-theoretic visualisation of logic and semantics and enables one to represent uncertainty in existential graphs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956713454&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956713454&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1571-0831(04)80037-6
DO - 10.1016/S1571-0831(04)80037-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77956713454
VL - 2
SP - 115
EP - 133
JO - Studies in Multidisciplinarity
JF - Studies in Multidisciplinarity
SN - 1571-0831
IS - C
ER -