TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of search strategies to design the cokriging neighborhood for predicting coregionalized variables
AU - Madani, Nasser
AU - Emery, Xavier
N1 - Funding Information:
The first author acknowledges the Nazarbayev University for funding this work via ?Faculty development competitive research Grants for 2018?2020? under Contract No. 090118FD5336. The second author acknowledges the Chilean Commission for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICYT), through Grant CONICYT PIA Anillo ACT1407.
Funding Information:
Acknowledgements The first author acknowledges the Nazarbayev University for funding this work via ‘‘Faculty development competitive research Grants for 2018–2020’’ under Contract No. 090118FD5336. The second author acknowledges the Chilean Commission for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICYT), through Grant CONICYT PIA Anillo ACT1407.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Cokriging allows predicting coregionalized variables from sampling information, by considering their spatial joint dependence structure. When secondary covariates are available exhaustively, solving the cokriging equations may become prohibitive, which motivates the use of a moving search neighborhood to select a subset of data, based on their closeness to the target location and the screen effect approximation. This paper investigates the efficiency of different strategies for designing a sub-optimal neighborhood wherein the simplification of the cokriging equations is challenging. To do so, five alternatives (single search, multiple search, strictly collocated search, multi-collocated search and isotopic search) are tested and compared with the reference unique neighborhood, through synthetic examples with different data configurations and spatial joint correlation models. The results indicate that the multi-collocated and multiple searches bear the highest resemblance to the reference case under the analyzed spatial structure models, while the single and the isotopic searches, which do not differentiate the primary and secondary sampling designs, yield the poorest results in terms of cokriging error variance.
AB - Cokriging allows predicting coregionalized variables from sampling information, by considering their spatial joint dependence structure. When secondary covariates are available exhaustively, solving the cokriging equations may become prohibitive, which motivates the use of a moving search neighborhood to select a subset of data, based on their closeness to the target location and the screen effect approximation. This paper investigates the efficiency of different strategies for designing a sub-optimal neighborhood wherein the simplification of the cokriging equations is challenging. To do so, five alternatives (single search, multiple search, strictly collocated search, multi-collocated search and isotopic search) are tested and compared with the reference unique neighborhood, through synthetic examples with different data configurations and spatial joint correlation models. The results indicate that the multi-collocated and multiple searches bear the highest resemblance to the reference case under the analyzed spatial structure models, while the single and the isotopic searches, which do not differentiate the primary and secondary sampling designs, yield the poorest results in terms of cokriging error variance.
KW - Cokriging neighborhood
KW - Heterotopic sampling
KW - Intrinsic correlation
KW - Markov-type models
KW - Multi-collocated cokriging
KW - Screening effect
KW - Strictly collocated cokriging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049590303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049590303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00477-018-1578-1
DO - 10.1007/s00477-018-1578-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85049590303
SN - 1436-3240
VL - 33
SP - 183
EP - 199
JO - Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
JF - Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
IS - 1
ER -