A control perspective on process intensification in dividing-wall columns

Anton A. Kiss, Costin Sorin Bildea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

133 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During the last decades, process intensification led to major developments also in separation technology. Particularly in distillation, dividing-wall column (DWC) is the next best thing as it allows significant energy savings combined with reduced investment costs. However, in spite of these clear advantages and the steady increase of DWC applications, the spreading of DWC at industrial scale is still limited to only a few companies. One of the major reasons for this status quo is the insufficient insight with regard to the operation and control of a DWC - this lack of knowledge making most chemical companies reticent to large-scale implementations. This study gives an overview of the available control strategies for DWC, varying from the classic three-point control structure and PID controllers in a multi-loop framework to model predictive control (MPC) and other advanced control strategies (LQG, LSDP, H and μ-synthesis). The previous studies prove that the DWC is not difficult to control providing that an appropriate control structure is selected. The available results show that MIMO controllers perform better than multi-loop PID controllers. However, among the decentralized multivariable PI structured controllers, LSV and DSV are the best control structures being able to handle persistent disturbances in reasonably short times. All things considered, this study clearly concludes that the DWC controllability is only perceived as a problem, but in fact there are no real solid grounds for concern.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)281-292
Number of pages12
JournalChemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Controllers
Distillation columns
Model predictive control
Controllability
MIMO systems
Distillation
Industry
Energy conservation
Costs

Keywords

  • μ-Synthesis
  • Control strategies
  • Dividing-wall column
  • H
  • LQG
  • LSDP
  • MPC
  • Petlyuk
  • PID

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Chemistry(all)
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cite this

A control perspective on process intensification in dividing-wall columns. / Kiss, Anton A.; Bildea, Costin Sorin.

In: Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, Vol. 50, No. 3, 03.2011, p. 281-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e51d65ad2aef45ff8ea3b1a9a4498898,
title = "A control perspective on process intensification in dividing-wall columns",
abstract = "During the last decades, process intensification led to major developments also in separation technology. Particularly in distillation, dividing-wall column (DWC) is the next best thing as it allows significant energy savings combined with reduced investment costs. However, in spite of these clear advantages and the steady increase of DWC applications, the spreading of DWC at industrial scale is still limited to only a few companies. One of the major reasons for this status quo is the insufficient insight with regard to the operation and control of a DWC - this lack of knowledge making most chemical companies reticent to large-scale implementations. This study gives an overview of the available control strategies for DWC, varying from the classic three-point control structure and PID controllers in a multi-loop framework to model predictive control (MPC) and other advanced control strategies (LQG, LSDP, H∞ and μ-synthesis). The previous studies prove that the DWC is not difficult to control providing that an appropriate control structure is selected. The available results show that MIMO controllers perform better than multi-loop PID controllers. However, among the decentralized multivariable PI structured controllers, LSV and DSV are the best control structures being able to handle persistent disturbances in reasonably short times. All things considered, this study clearly concludes that the DWC controllability is only perceived as a problem, but in fact there are no real solid grounds for concern.",
keywords = "μ-Synthesis, Control strategies, Dividing-wall column, H, LQG, LSDP, MPC, Petlyuk, PID",
author = "Kiss, {Anton A.} and Bildea, {Costin Sorin}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.cep.2011.01.011",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "281--292",
journal = "Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification",
issn = "0255-2701",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A control perspective on process intensification in dividing-wall columns

AU - Kiss, Anton A.

AU - Bildea, Costin Sorin

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - During the last decades, process intensification led to major developments also in separation technology. Particularly in distillation, dividing-wall column (DWC) is the next best thing as it allows significant energy savings combined with reduced investment costs. However, in spite of these clear advantages and the steady increase of DWC applications, the spreading of DWC at industrial scale is still limited to only a few companies. One of the major reasons for this status quo is the insufficient insight with regard to the operation and control of a DWC - this lack of knowledge making most chemical companies reticent to large-scale implementations. This study gives an overview of the available control strategies for DWC, varying from the classic three-point control structure and PID controllers in a multi-loop framework to model predictive control (MPC) and other advanced control strategies (LQG, LSDP, H∞ and μ-synthesis). The previous studies prove that the DWC is not difficult to control providing that an appropriate control structure is selected. The available results show that MIMO controllers perform better than multi-loop PID controllers. However, among the decentralized multivariable PI structured controllers, LSV and DSV are the best control structures being able to handle persistent disturbances in reasonably short times. All things considered, this study clearly concludes that the DWC controllability is only perceived as a problem, but in fact there are no real solid grounds for concern.

AB - During the last decades, process intensification led to major developments also in separation technology. Particularly in distillation, dividing-wall column (DWC) is the next best thing as it allows significant energy savings combined with reduced investment costs. However, in spite of these clear advantages and the steady increase of DWC applications, the spreading of DWC at industrial scale is still limited to only a few companies. One of the major reasons for this status quo is the insufficient insight with regard to the operation and control of a DWC - this lack of knowledge making most chemical companies reticent to large-scale implementations. This study gives an overview of the available control strategies for DWC, varying from the classic three-point control structure and PID controllers in a multi-loop framework to model predictive control (MPC) and other advanced control strategies (LQG, LSDP, H∞ and μ-synthesis). The previous studies prove that the DWC is not difficult to control providing that an appropriate control structure is selected. The available results show that MIMO controllers perform better than multi-loop PID controllers. However, among the decentralized multivariable PI structured controllers, LSV and DSV are the best control structures being able to handle persistent disturbances in reasonably short times. All things considered, this study clearly concludes that the DWC controllability is only perceived as a problem, but in fact there are no real solid grounds for concern.

KW - μ-Synthesis

KW - Control strategies

KW - Dividing-wall column

KW - H

KW - LQG

KW - LSDP

KW - MPC

KW - Petlyuk

KW - PID

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953028161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953028161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cep.2011.01.011

DO - 10.1016/j.cep.2011.01.011

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 281

EP - 292

JO - Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification

JF - Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification

SN - 0255-2701

IS - 3

ER -