A rough set-based quality function deployment (QFD) approach for environmental performance evaluation

A case of offshore oil and gas operations

Ming Yang, Faisal I. Khan, Rehan Sadiq, Paul Amyotte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Activities in offshore oil and gas (OOG) that cause environmental impacts can be systematically managed through an environmental management system (EMS). Environmental performance evaluation (EPE) is an essential part of an EMS. However, previous studies on EPE indicate that existing lists of indicators little insight into how indicators are modified to more accurately assess environmental performance. In this paper, a way is proposed to identify and define specific environmental performance indicators on a case-by-case basis, which consists of five steps: (1) describing environmental requirements; (2) determining favourable outcomes corresponding to the requirements; (3) identifying required activities or issues to achieve the outcomes; (4) searching for proper measures of the activities or issues; and (5) generating a list of key indicators. Based on these steps, a quality function deployment (QFD) approach is developed to determine key indicators and evaluate environmental performance. To handle uncertainties in QFD, the decision makers' evaluations are quantified through rough numbers using the concept of rough sets. The outputs of the proposed approach are different environmental performance indices. Using these indices, decision makers can easily determine whether an improved performance has been achieved through an EMS. The proposed approach is transparent and promising for use as a unified tool for EPE. An application of the proposed approach is demonstrated through a numerical example.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1513-1526
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume19
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Environmental management systems
Quality function deployment
oil
Gases
gas
environmental management
Environmental impact
Thermodynamic properties
Oils
evaluation
environmental performance
Performance evaluation
Environmental performance
Oil
Rough set
Gas
environmental impact
indicator
Environmental management system

Keywords

  • Environmental performance evaluation (EPE)
  • Offshore oil and gas (OOG)
  • Quality function deployment (QFD)
  • Rough set theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

A rough set-based quality function deployment (QFD) approach for environmental performance evaluation : A case of offshore oil and gas operations. / Yang, Ming; Khan, Faisal I.; Sadiq, Rehan; Amyotte, Paul.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 19, No. 13, 09.2011, p. 1513-1526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4c19a93dd9b34c89abddd27b59716ee5,
title = "A rough set-based quality function deployment (QFD) approach for environmental performance evaluation: A case of offshore oil and gas operations",
abstract = "Activities in offshore oil and gas (OOG) that cause environmental impacts can be systematically managed through an environmental management system (EMS). Environmental performance evaluation (EPE) is an essential part of an EMS. However, previous studies on EPE indicate that existing lists of indicators little insight into how indicators are modified to more accurately assess environmental performance. In this paper, a way is proposed to identify and define specific environmental performance indicators on a case-by-case basis, which consists of five steps: (1) describing environmental requirements; (2) determining favourable outcomes corresponding to the requirements; (3) identifying required activities or issues to achieve the outcomes; (4) searching for proper measures of the activities or issues; and (5) generating a list of key indicators. Based on these steps, a quality function deployment (QFD) approach is developed to determine key indicators and evaluate environmental performance. To handle uncertainties in QFD, the decision makers' evaluations are quantified through rough numbers using the concept of rough sets. The outputs of the proposed approach are different environmental performance indices. Using these indices, decision makers can easily determine whether an improved performance has been achieved through an EMS. The proposed approach is transparent and promising for use as a unified tool for EPE. An application of the proposed approach is demonstrated through a numerical example.",
keywords = "Environmental performance evaluation (EPE), Offshore oil and gas (OOG), Quality function deployment (QFD), Rough set theory",
author = "Ming Yang and Khan, {Faisal I.} and Rehan Sadiq and Paul Amyotte",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.005",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1513--1526",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A rough set-based quality function deployment (QFD) approach for environmental performance evaluation

T2 - A case of offshore oil and gas operations

AU - Yang, Ming

AU - Khan, Faisal I.

AU - Sadiq, Rehan

AU - Amyotte, Paul

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - Activities in offshore oil and gas (OOG) that cause environmental impacts can be systematically managed through an environmental management system (EMS). Environmental performance evaluation (EPE) is an essential part of an EMS. However, previous studies on EPE indicate that existing lists of indicators little insight into how indicators are modified to more accurately assess environmental performance. In this paper, a way is proposed to identify and define specific environmental performance indicators on a case-by-case basis, which consists of five steps: (1) describing environmental requirements; (2) determining favourable outcomes corresponding to the requirements; (3) identifying required activities or issues to achieve the outcomes; (4) searching for proper measures of the activities or issues; and (5) generating a list of key indicators. Based on these steps, a quality function deployment (QFD) approach is developed to determine key indicators and evaluate environmental performance. To handle uncertainties in QFD, the decision makers' evaluations are quantified through rough numbers using the concept of rough sets. The outputs of the proposed approach are different environmental performance indices. Using these indices, decision makers can easily determine whether an improved performance has been achieved through an EMS. The proposed approach is transparent and promising for use as a unified tool for EPE. An application of the proposed approach is demonstrated through a numerical example.

AB - Activities in offshore oil and gas (OOG) that cause environmental impacts can be systematically managed through an environmental management system (EMS). Environmental performance evaluation (EPE) is an essential part of an EMS. However, previous studies on EPE indicate that existing lists of indicators little insight into how indicators are modified to more accurately assess environmental performance. In this paper, a way is proposed to identify and define specific environmental performance indicators on a case-by-case basis, which consists of five steps: (1) describing environmental requirements; (2) determining favourable outcomes corresponding to the requirements; (3) identifying required activities or issues to achieve the outcomes; (4) searching for proper measures of the activities or issues; and (5) generating a list of key indicators. Based on these steps, a quality function deployment (QFD) approach is developed to determine key indicators and evaluate environmental performance. To handle uncertainties in QFD, the decision makers' evaluations are quantified through rough numbers using the concept of rough sets. The outputs of the proposed approach are different environmental performance indices. Using these indices, decision makers can easily determine whether an improved performance has been achieved through an EMS. The proposed approach is transparent and promising for use as a unified tool for EPE. An application of the proposed approach is demonstrated through a numerical example.

KW - Environmental performance evaluation (EPE)

KW - Offshore oil and gas (OOG)

KW - Quality function deployment (QFD)

KW - Rough set theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959769230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959769230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.005

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 1513

EP - 1526

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

IS - 13

ER -