Accounting for a spatial trend in fine-scale ground-penetrating radar data: A comparative case study

Y. Dagasan, O. Erten, Erkan Topal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

In geostatistics, one of the challenges is to account for the spatial trend that is evident in a data-set. Two well-known kriging algorithms, namely universal kriging (UK) and intrinsic random function of order k (IRF-k), are mainly used to deal with the trend apparent in the data-set. These two algorithms differ in the way they account for the trend and they both have different advantages and drawbacks. In this study, the performances of UK, IRF-k, and ordinary kriging (OK) methods are compared on densely sampled ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data acquired to assist in delineation of the ore and waste contact within a laterite-type bauxite deposit. The original GPR data was first pre-processed to generate prediction and validation data sets in order to compare the estimation performance of each kriging algorithm. The structural analysis required for each algorithm was carried out and the resulting variograms and generalized covariance models were verified through cross-validation. The variable representing the elevation of the ore unit base was then estimated at the unknown locations using the prediction data-set. The estimated values were compared against the validation data using mean absolute error (MAE) and mean squared error (MSE) criteria. The results show although IRF-k slightly outperformed OK and UK, all the algorithms produced satisfactory and similar results. MSE values obtained from the comparison with the validation data were 0.1267, 0.1322, and 0.1349 for IRF-k, OK, and UK algorithms respectively. The similarity in the results generated by these algorithms is explained by the existence of a large data-set and the chosen neighbourhood parameters for the kriging technique.

LanguageEnglish
Pages173-184
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
Volume118
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

ground penetrating radar
kriging
comparative study
Radar
Ores
Bauxite deposits
trend
Structural analysis
laterite
bauxite
geostatistics
variogram
structural analysis
prediction

Keywords

  • Geostatistics
  • Ground-penetrating radar
  • Intrinsic random function of order k
  • Nonstationarity
  • Ordinary kriging
  • Universal kriging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Metals and Alloys
  • Materials Chemistry

Cite this

Accounting for a spatial trend in fine-scale ground-penetrating radar data : A comparative case study. / Dagasan, Y.; Erten, O.; Topal, Erkan.

In: Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Vol. 118, No. 2, 01.02.2018, p. 173-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{754d3519a0bd4cc8a74ccb6ab9c62154,
title = "Accounting for a spatial trend in fine-scale ground-penetrating radar data: A comparative case study",
abstract = "In geostatistics, one of the challenges is to account for the spatial trend that is evident in a data-set. Two well-known kriging algorithms, namely universal kriging (UK) and intrinsic random function of order k (IRF-k), are mainly used to deal with the trend apparent in the data-set. These two algorithms differ in the way they account for the trend and they both have different advantages and drawbacks. In this study, the performances of UK, IRF-k, and ordinary kriging (OK) methods are compared on densely sampled ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data acquired to assist in delineation of the ore and waste contact within a laterite-type bauxite deposit. The original GPR data was first pre-processed to generate prediction and validation data sets in order to compare the estimation performance of each kriging algorithm. The structural analysis required for each algorithm was carried out and the resulting variograms and generalized covariance models were verified through cross-validation. The variable representing the elevation of the ore unit base was then estimated at the unknown locations using the prediction data-set. The estimated values were compared against the validation data using mean absolute error (MAE) and mean squared error (MSE) criteria. The results show although IRF-k slightly outperformed OK and UK, all the algorithms produced satisfactory and similar results. MSE values obtained from the comparison with the validation data were 0.1267, 0.1322, and 0.1349 for IRF-k, OK, and UK algorithms respectively. The similarity in the results generated by these algorithms is explained by the existence of a large data-set and the chosen neighbourhood parameters for the kriging technique.",
keywords = "Geostatistics, Ground-penetrating radar, Intrinsic random function of order k, Nonstationarity, Ordinary kriging, Universal kriging",
author = "Y. Dagasan and O. Erten and Erkan Topal",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.17159/2411-9717/2018/v118n2a11",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
pages = "173--184",
journal = "Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy",
issn = "2225-6253",
publisher = "South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accounting for a spatial trend in fine-scale ground-penetrating radar data

T2 - Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

AU - Dagasan, Y.

AU - Erten, O.

AU - Topal, Erkan

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - In geostatistics, one of the challenges is to account for the spatial trend that is evident in a data-set. Two well-known kriging algorithms, namely universal kriging (UK) and intrinsic random function of order k (IRF-k), are mainly used to deal with the trend apparent in the data-set. These two algorithms differ in the way they account for the trend and they both have different advantages and drawbacks. In this study, the performances of UK, IRF-k, and ordinary kriging (OK) methods are compared on densely sampled ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data acquired to assist in delineation of the ore and waste contact within a laterite-type bauxite deposit. The original GPR data was first pre-processed to generate prediction and validation data sets in order to compare the estimation performance of each kriging algorithm. The structural analysis required for each algorithm was carried out and the resulting variograms and generalized covariance models were verified through cross-validation. The variable representing the elevation of the ore unit base was then estimated at the unknown locations using the prediction data-set. The estimated values were compared against the validation data using mean absolute error (MAE) and mean squared error (MSE) criteria. The results show although IRF-k slightly outperformed OK and UK, all the algorithms produced satisfactory and similar results. MSE values obtained from the comparison with the validation data were 0.1267, 0.1322, and 0.1349 for IRF-k, OK, and UK algorithms respectively. The similarity in the results generated by these algorithms is explained by the existence of a large data-set and the chosen neighbourhood parameters for the kriging technique.

AB - In geostatistics, one of the challenges is to account for the spatial trend that is evident in a data-set. Two well-known kriging algorithms, namely universal kriging (UK) and intrinsic random function of order k (IRF-k), are mainly used to deal with the trend apparent in the data-set. These two algorithms differ in the way they account for the trend and they both have different advantages and drawbacks. In this study, the performances of UK, IRF-k, and ordinary kriging (OK) methods are compared on densely sampled ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data acquired to assist in delineation of the ore and waste contact within a laterite-type bauxite deposit. The original GPR data was first pre-processed to generate prediction and validation data sets in order to compare the estimation performance of each kriging algorithm. The structural analysis required for each algorithm was carried out and the resulting variograms and generalized covariance models were verified through cross-validation. The variable representing the elevation of the ore unit base was then estimated at the unknown locations using the prediction data-set. The estimated values were compared against the validation data using mean absolute error (MAE) and mean squared error (MSE) criteria. The results show although IRF-k slightly outperformed OK and UK, all the algorithms produced satisfactory and similar results. MSE values obtained from the comparison with the validation data were 0.1267, 0.1322, and 0.1349 for IRF-k, OK, and UK algorithms respectively. The similarity in the results generated by these algorithms is explained by the existence of a large data-set and the chosen neighbourhood parameters for the kriging technique.

KW - Geostatistics

KW - Ground-penetrating radar

KW - Intrinsic random function of order k

KW - Nonstationarity

KW - Ordinary kriging

KW - Universal kriging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047943778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047943778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17159/2411-9717/2018/v118n2a11

DO - 10.17159/2411-9717/2018/v118n2a11

M3 - Article

VL - 118

SP - 173

EP - 184

JO - Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

JF - Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

SN - 2225-6253

IS - 2

ER -