Adding trade to the equation: Multilevel modeling of biased civil war interventions

Szymon M. Stojek, Mwita Chacha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Third-party interventions have long been considered one of the most important events in civil war processes, affecting both duration and outcome of these conflicts. Understanding what affects probability of intervention in support of government or rebels is thus crucial. Interestingly, comparatively little attention has been paid to explanations of why third-party states intervene in civil conflicts of other states and even fewer studies model economic motivations for interventions. Our study focuses on the extent to which bilateral trade ties influence states’ decisions to intervene in conflicts of important trading partners. We model the influence of formal trade ties on the probability of pro-government and pro-rebel interventions. The argument asserts that trade ties work in ways similar to existing strategic alliances – favoring intervention on the side of the government rather than the opposition. The analyses use a multilevel modeling method, which enables us to appropriately model two levels of observed variables: conflict characteristics, the same for all potential interveners, and dyadic ties, varying across potential interveners. The findings support the role of bilateral trade ties in motivating interventions, and specifically in predicting interventions on the side of the embattled government. Our contribution is especially informative given the post-WWII exponential increase in both civil war phenomena and economic interdependence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-242
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Peace Research
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 27 2015

Fingerprint

civil war
Economics
economic interdependence
party state
economic model
opposition
event

Keywords

  • bilateral trade
  • civil war intervention
  • multilevel modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Safety Research

Cite this

Adding trade to the equation : Multilevel modeling of biased civil war interventions. / Stojek, Szymon M.; Chacha, Mwita.

In: Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 52, No. 2, 27.03.2015, p. 228-242.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c56b85bbb6914bffb82919e643f2e600,
title = "Adding trade to the equation: Multilevel modeling of biased civil war interventions",
abstract = "Third-party interventions have long been considered one of the most important events in civil war processes, affecting both duration and outcome of these conflicts. Understanding what affects probability of intervention in support of government or rebels is thus crucial. Interestingly, comparatively little attention has been paid to explanations of why third-party states intervene in civil conflicts of other states and even fewer studies model economic motivations for interventions. Our study focuses on the extent to which bilateral trade ties influence states’ decisions to intervene in conflicts of important trading partners. We model the influence of formal trade ties on the probability of pro-government and pro-rebel interventions. The argument asserts that trade ties work in ways similar to existing strategic alliances – favoring intervention on the side of the government rather than the opposition. The analyses use a multilevel modeling method, which enables us to appropriately model two levels of observed variables: conflict characteristics, the same for all potential interveners, and dyadic ties, varying across potential interveners. The findings support the role of bilateral trade ties in motivating interventions, and specifically in predicting interventions on the side of the embattled government. Our contribution is especially informative given the post-WWII exponential increase in both civil war phenomena and economic interdependence.",
keywords = "bilateral trade, civil war intervention, multilevel modeling",
author = "Stojek, {Szymon M.} and Mwita Chacha",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1177/0022343314561406",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "228--242",
journal = "Journal of Peace Research",
issn = "0022-3433",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adding trade to the equation

T2 - Multilevel modeling of biased civil war interventions

AU - Stojek, Szymon M.

AU - Chacha, Mwita

PY - 2015/3/27

Y1 - 2015/3/27

N2 - Third-party interventions have long been considered one of the most important events in civil war processes, affecting both duration and outcome of these conflicts. Understanding what affects probability of intervention in support of government or rebels is thus crucial. Interestingly, comparatively little attention has been paid to explanations of why third-party states intervene in civil conflicts of other states and even fewer studies model economic motivations for interventions. Our study focuses on the extent to which bilateral trade ties influence states’ decisions to intervene in conflicts of important trading partners. We model the influence of formal trade ties on the probability of pro-government and pro-rebel interventions. The argument asserts that trade ties work in ways similar to existing strategic alliances – favoring intervention on the side of the government rather than the opposition. The analyses use a multilevel modeling method, which enables us to appropriately model two levels of observed variables: conflict characteristics, the same for all potential interveners, and dyadic ties, varying across potential interveners. The findings support the role of bilateral trade ties in motivating interventions, and specifically in predicting interventions on the side of the embattled government. Our contribution is especially informative given the post-WWII exponential increase in both civil war phenomena and economic interdependence.

AB - Third-party interventions have long been considered one of the most important events in civil war processes, affecting both duration and outcome of these conflicts. Understanding what affects probability of intervention in support of government or rebels is thus crucial. Interestingly, comparatively little attention has been paid to explanations of why third-party states intervene in civil conflicts of other states and even fewer studies model economic motivations for interventions. Our study focuses on the extent to which bilateral trade ties influence states’ decisions to intervene in conflicts of important trading partners. We model the influence of formal trade ties on the probability of pro-government and pro-rebel interventions. The argument asserts that trade ties work in ways similar to existing strategic alliances – favoring intervention on the side of the government rather than the opposition. The analyses use a multilevel modeling method, which enables us to appropriately model two levels of observed variables: conflict characteristics, the same for all potential interveners, and dyadic ties, varying across potential interveners. The findings support the role of bilateral trade ties in motivating interventions, and specifically in predicting interventions on the side of the embattled government. Our contribution is especially informative given the post-WWII exponential increase in both civil war phenomena and economic interdependence.

KW - bilateral trade

KW - civil war intervention

KW - multilevel modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923862210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923862210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022343314561406

DO - 10.1177/0022343314561406

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 228

EP - 242

JO - Journal of Peace Research

JF - Journal of Peace Research

SN - 0022-3433

IS - 2

ER -