TY - JOUR
T1 - Adopting and managing open data
T2 - Stakeholder perspectives, challenges and policy recommendations
AU - Kassen, Maxat
N1 - Funding Information:
In this respect, the non-governmental organizations supported by businesses could provide an additional funding for independent developers and even academic communities and think tanks through traditional grant contests (the fourth stage) in an attempt to activate research and development and further networking in the area. This could eventually result in an increasingly higher level of knowledge and expertise not only among key stakeholders of the open data movement but also among those who actively advocate today in Finland such new aspects of open knowledge politics as open science and open software movements. Furthermore, any publications and new software solutions developed at this stage should be provided in an open and free of charge manner, especially if they are funded openly from public or institutional grants, dramatically contributing to public good. The ultimate byproduct of such self-sustainable mechanism of public relations campaigns in the area could actually be a new generation of various open data-driven services for citizens and government itself (the fifth stage). In this respect, it is necessary to understand that journalistic communities should play an important if not crucial role in the scheme by providing publicity and raising general awareness about the open data movement as a collaborative phenomenon, transforming, thus, the traditional open data adoption philosophy (publication/reuse/ feedback) to a new more collaborative one (publication/support/reuse/feedback) (see Figure 9).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/9/17
Y1 - 2018/9/17
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to study a multi-institutional and multi-layer nature of open data-driven communication processes that provide a collaborative platform to meet the interests of various stakeholders in advancing public sector innovations, namely, government agents, citizens, independent developers, non-governmental organizations, mass media and businesses alike and understand an important role of mutually beneficial public–private partnerships in the area. Design/methodology/approach: This is a case study research, which itself is based on a combinative approach, especially in applying, in a successive order, two methods of investigation, namely, stakeholder and policy analysis. In general, the combination of these two research techniques is useful in understanding the most important collaborative trends in the area and locating key institutional drivers and challenges that open data policymakers face today in implementing related digital collaborative and participatory platforms. Findings: The open data concept could provide a promising collaborative platform to network various e-government stakeholders and accelerate related technology-driven public reforms. The successful implementation of the idea demands a fairly equal contribution from representatives of both public and private sectors of economy. The case has also clearly demonstrated the importance of cooperation with the local non-governmental sector, independent developers and journalists, whose active participation is a key factor for the overall progress of the open data phenomenon, to a greater degree, as a collaborative movement rather than an instrument of public sector innovations. Research limitations/implications: One of the fundamental limitations of the investigation is that it is a single case study. It explores the development of open data phenomena in the context of such an advanced post-industrial society as Finland. In this regard, in order to support key arguments of the research, it is necessary to compare its findings with the results of similar case studies in other administrative, political and socioeconomic settings, which would open new promising dimensions for future research in this direction. Practical implications: Policy recommendations are proposed by the author in the discussion section, which could help, for example, to boost information campaigns in popularizing open data technologies and its reuse among independent developers. A lot of unique visualizations and illustrations are presented in the paper to help readers grasp better key ideas of the research. In this respect, the paper is intended for a global professional community of open data experts, e-government specialists, political scientists, journalists, lawyers, students of public policy and public administration and all those who are interested in studying the phenomenon from the perspective of its key stakeholders. Social implications: The author of the paper tried to develop a universal framework of case study research that could be used in investigating phenomena of open data not only in Finland but also in the context of other post-industrial societies, especially in analyzing roles of various stakeholders in adopting open data-driven collaborative and civic engagement platforms and startups. Originality/value: This research presents a first case study that investigates a collaborative potential of open data phenomena from a stakeholder perspective in a more holistic manner, especially in analyzing professional networking platforms and related communication activities that meet the interests of stakeholders as diverse as government agents and journalists, independent developers and academia, charities and businesses in an attempt to better understand the fundamental factors of the open data movement as a collaborative socioeconomic trend.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to study a multi-institutional and multi-layer nature of open data-driven communication processes that provide a collaborative platform to meet the interests of various stakeholders in advancing public sector innovations, namely, government agents, citizens, independent developers, non-governmental organizations, mass media and businesses alike and understand an important role of mutually beneficial public–private partnerships in the area. Design/methodology/approach: This is a case study research, which itself is based on a combinative approach, especially in applying, in a successive order, two methods of investigation, namely, stakeholder and policy analysis. In general, the combination of these two research techniques is useful in understanding the most important collaborative trends in the area and locating key institutional drivers and challenges that open data policymakers face today in implementing related digital collaborative and participatory platforms. Findings: The open data concept could provide a promising collaborative platform to network various e-government stakeholders and accelerate related technology-driven public reforms. The successful implementation of the idea demands a fairly equal contribution from representatives of both public and private sectors of economy. The case has also clearly demonstrated the importance of cooperation with the local non-governmental sector, independent developers and journalists, whose active participation is a key factor for the overall progress of the open data phenomenon, to a greater degree, as a collaborative movement rather than an instrument of public sector innovations. Research limitations/implications: One of the fundamental limitations of the investigation is that it is a single case study. It explores the development of open data phenomena in the context of such an advanced post-industrial society as Finland. In this regard, in order to support key arguments of the research, it is necessary to compare its findings with the results of similar case studies in other administrative, political and socioeconomic settings, which would open new promising dimensions for future research in this direction. Practical implications: Policy recommendations are proposed by the author in the discussion section, which could help, for example, to boost information campaigns in popularizing open data technologies and its reuse among independent developers. A lot of unique visualizations and illustrations are presented in the paper to help readers grasp better key ideas of the research. In this respect, the paper is intended for a global professional community of open data experts, e-government specialists, political scientists, journalists, lawyers, students of public policy and public administration and all those who are interested in studying the phenomenon from the perspective of its key stakeholders. Social implications: The author of the paper tried to develop a universal framework of case study research that could be used in investigating phenomena of open data not only in Finland but also in the context of other post-industrial societies, especially in analyzing roles of various stakeholders in adopting open data-driven collaborative and civic engagement platforms and startups. Originality/value: This research presents a first case study that investigates a collaborative potential of open data phenomena from a stakeholder perspective in a more holistic manner, especially in analyzing professional networking platforms and related communication activities that meet the interests of stakeholders as diverse as government agents and journalists, independent developers and academia, charities and businesses in an attempt to better understand the fundamental factors of the open data movement as a collaborative socioeconomic trend.
KW - Collaboration
KW - Finland
KW - Open data
KW - Open government
KW - Policy recommendations
KW - Stakeholders
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053429540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053429540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/AJIM-11-2017-0250
DO - 10.1108/AJIM-11-2017-0250
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85053429540
VL - 70
SP - 518
EP - 537
JO - Aslib Journal of Information Management
JF - Aslib Journal of Information Management
SN - 2050-3806
IS - 5
ER -