Anonymous versus confidential HIV testing

Client and provider decision making under uncertainty

Oscar Grusky, Kathleen Johnston Roberts, Aimee Noelle Swanson, Elizabeth Joniak, Jennifer Leich, Gwen McEvoy, Keith Murphy, Kristen Schilt, Valerie Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Six intensive observational studies of HIV testing sites were undertaken in order to improve understanding of confidential and anonymous testing. Three sites offered only confidential testing (a large health maintenance organization's Urgent Care clinic, the same organization's HIV clinic, and a private medical practitioner's office), one offered only anonymous testing (a free clinic), and two offered a choice of confidential or anonymous testing (a thrift shop alternate testing site and a mobile testing unit). Multiple data collection strategies were used including direct field observation, semistructured interviews with clients and providers, and document and policy analysis. Using an organizational/interactional uncertainty framework, this study found that the choice between anonymous and confidential testing is a central aspect of the HIV testing process, that some clients are unclear about the differences between anonymous and confidential testing, that alternate testing sites' providers play a significant role in encouraging confidential rather than anonymous testing in order to further their organization's resource needs and public health goals, and that testing counselors' may consider that some clients prefer anonymous testing because of fear of stigma, discrimination, or loss of privacy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-166
Number of pages10
JournalAIDS Patient Care and STDs
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anonymous Testing
Uncertainty
Decision Making
HIV
Organizations
Health Maintenance Organizations
Privacy
Policy Making
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Fear
Observational Studies
Public Health
Observation
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Leadership and Management
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Grusky, O., Roberts, K. J., Swanson, A. N., Joniak, E., Leich, J., McEvoy, G., ... Wilson, V. (2005). Anonymous versus confidential HIV testing: Client and provider decision making under uncertainty. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 19(3), 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2005.19.157

Anonymous versus confidential HIV testing : Client and provider decision making under uncertainty. / Grusky, Oscar; Roberts, Kathleen Johnston; Swanson, Aimee Noelle; Joniak, Elizabeth; Leich, Jennifer; McEvoy, Gwen; Murphy, Keith; Schilt, Kristen; Wilson, Valerie.

In: AIDS Patient Care and STDs, Vol. 19, No. 3, 03.2005, p. 157-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Grusky, O, Roberts, KJ, Swanson, AN, Joniak, E, Leich, J, McEvoy, G, Murphy, K, Schilt, K & Wilson, V 2005, 'Anonymous versus confidential HIV testing: Client and provider decision making under uncertainty', AIDS Patient Care and STDs, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2005.19.157
Grusky, Oscar ; Roberts, Kathleen Johnston ; Swanson, Aimee Noelle ; Joniak, Elizabeth ; Leich, Jennifer ; McEvoy, Gwen ; Murphy, Keith ; Schilt, Kristen ; Wilson, Valerie. / Anonymous versus confidential HIV testing : Client and provider decision making under uncertainty. In: AIDS Patient Care and STDs. 2005 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 157-166.
@article{888c3b3f004444b480e0672739526bc5,
title = "Anonymous versus confidential HIV testing: Client and provider decision making under uncertainty",
abstract = "Six intensive observational studies of HIV testing sites were undertaken in order to improve understanding of confidential and anonymous testing. Three sites offered only confidential testing (a large health maintenance organization's Urgent Care clinic, the same organization's HIV clinic, and a private medical practitioner's office), one offered only anonymous testing (a free clinic), and two offered a choice of confidential or anonymous testing (a thrift shop alternate testing site and a mobile testing unit). Multiple data collection strategies were used including direct field observation, semistructured interviews with clients and providers, and document and policy analysis. Using an organizational/interactional uncertainty framework, this study found that the choice between anonymous and confidential testing is a central aspect of the HIV testing process, that some clients are unclear about the differences between anonymous and confidential testing, that alternate testing sites' providers play a significant role in encouraging confidential rather than anonymous testing in order to further their organization's resource needs and public health goals, and that testing counselors' may consider that some clients prefer anonymous testing because of fear of stigma, discrimination, or loss of privacy.",
author = "Oscar Grusky and Roberts, {Kathleen Johnston} and Swanson, {Aimee Noelle} and Elizabeth Joniak and Jennifer Leich and Gwen McEvoy and Keith Murphy and Kristen Schilt and Valerie Wilson",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1089/apc.2005.19.157",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "157--166",
journal = "AIDS Patient Care and STDs",
issn = "1087-2914",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anonymous versus confidential HIV testing

T2 - Client and provider decision making under uncertainty

AU - Grusky, Oscar

AU - Roberts, Kathleen Johnston

AU - Swanson, Aimee Noelle

AU - Joniak, Elizabeth

AU - Leich, Jennifer

AU - McEvoy, Gwen

AU - Murphy, Keith

AU - Schilt, Kristen

AU - Wilson, Valerie

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - Six intensive observational studies of HIV testing sites were undertaken in order to improve understanding of confidential and anonymous testing. Three sites offered only confidential testing (a large health maintenance organization's Urgent Care clinic, the same organization's HIV clinic, and a private medical practitioner's office), one offered only anonymous testing (a free clinic), and two offered a choice of confidential or anonymous testing (a thrift shop alternate testing site and a mobile testing unit). Multiple data collection strategies were used including direct field observation, semistructured interviews with clients and providers, and document and policy analysis. Using an organizational/interactional uncertainty framework, this study found that the choice between anonymous and confidential testing is a central aspect of the HIV testing process, that some clients are unclear about the differences between anonymous and confidential testing, that alternate testing sites' providers play a significant role in encouraging confidential rather than anonymous testing in order to further their organization's resource needs and public health goals, and that testing counselors' may consider that some clients prefer anonymous testing because of fear of stigma, discrimination, or loss of privacy.

AB - Six intensive observational studies of HIV testing sites were undertaken in order to improve understanding of confidential and anonymous testing. Three sites offered only confidential testing (a large health maintenance organization's Urgent Care clinic, the same organization's HIV clinic, and a private medical practitioner's office), one offered only anonymous testing (a free clinic), and two offered a choice of confidential or anonymous testing (a thrift shop alternate testing site and a mobile testing unit). Multiple data collection strategies were used including direct field observation, semistructured interviews with clients and providers, and document and policy analysis. Using an organizational/interactional uncertainty framework, this study found that the choice between anonymous and confidential testing is a central aspect of the HIV testing process, that some clients are unclear about the differences between anonymous and confidential testing, that alternate testing sites' providers play a significant role in encouraging confidential rather than anonymous testing in order to further their organization's resource needs and public health goals, and that testing counselors' may consider that some clients prefer anonymous testing because of fear of stigma, discrimination, or loss of privacy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16444375435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16444375435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/apc.2005.19.157

DO - 10.1089/apc.2005.19.157

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 157

EP - 166

JO - AIDS Patient Care and STDs

JF - AIDS Patient Care and STDs

SN - 1087-2914

IS - 3

ER -