Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessing performance of modern Brillouin spectrometers

  • Zachary Coker
  • , Maria Troyanova-Wood
  • , Andrew J. Traverso
  • , Talgat Yakupov
  • , Zhandos N. Utegulov
  • , Vladislav V. Yakovlev
  • Texas A&M University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

56   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Brillouin spectroscopy and imaging has experienced a renaissance in recent years seeing vast improvements in methodology and increasing number of applications. With this resurgence has come the development of new spontaneous Brillouin instruments that often tout superior performance compared to established conventional systems such as tandem Fabry-Perot interferometers (TFPI). The performance of these new systems cannot always be thoroughly examined beyond the scope of the intended application, as applications often take precedence in reports. We therefore present evaluation of three modern Brillouin spectrometers: two VIPA-based spectrometers with wavelength-specific notch filters, and one scanning 6-pass TFPI. Performance analysis is presented along with a discussion about the dependence of measurements on excitation laser source and the various susceptibilities of each system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2400-2409
Number of pages10
JournalOptics Express
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 5 2018

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) (DBI-1455671, DBI-1532188, ECCS-1509268); US Department of Defense (DOD) (FA9550-15-1-0517, N00014-16-1-2578), Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) (RP160834), Nazarbayev University (SST2015014) and the state-targeted programs Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (BR05236524 and BR05236454).

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing performance of modern Brillouin spectrometers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this