TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the Russian Version of the Leading a Culture of Quality in Infection Prevention Scale among Nurses in Kazakhstan
AU - Cruz, Jonas Preposi
AU - Colet, Paolo
AU - Almazan, Joseph
AU - Kuntuganova, Anargul
AU - Syzdykova, Alma
AU - Agazhayeva, Gaukhar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Jonas Preposi Cruz et al.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background. Worldwide, hospitals are required to prioritize the culture of quality in infection prevention (CQIP) for patient safety. Assessing CQIP is crucial, but there is limited research, especially regarding nurses’ perceptions. Insufficient information exists due to scarcity of validated instruments in local languages to measure CQIP internationally. Purpose. This study assessed the “Leading a Culture of Quality in Infection Prevention Scale” Russian version’s (LCQ-IPS-R) validity and reliability to assess the CQIP of hospitals in Kazakhstan based on nurses’ perceptions. Methods. This study utilized a methodological design and analyzed data from 204 nurses at the “National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health” in Astana City, Kazakhstan. The “cultural and linguistic adaptation” process involved a “forward-backward translation” technique. Content validity and construct validity were examined. Internal consistency reliability was explored for scale reliability. Results. The scale’s mean item range was from 3.56 (SD = 1.22) to 4.40 (SD = 0.85; SD = 0.92). The corrected item-total correlation ranged from 0.321 to 0.707. Six experts rated the I-CVI from 0.83 to 1.00, with an S-CVI/Ave of 0.90. The principal component analysis with Varimax rotation produced four distinct components of the LCQ-IPS-R, explaining 69.8% of the total variance. The tests of correlation between the LCQ-IPS-R’s four components revealed medium to large positive associations among the components (r = 0.25-0.55, p < 0.001 ). The computed α for the LCQ-IPS-R was 0.909 while α values from four subscales ranged from 0.809 to 0.921. Conclusions/Implications for Practice. This study provides evidence of the LCQ-IP-R’s reliability and validity in evaluating Russian-speaking nurses’ perception of their hospital’s CQIP. These findings open the door for further research on CQIP in healthcare settings in Kazakhstan, Central Asia, and other Russian-speaking countries. The scale provides essential baseline information to design effective interventions for achieving hospitals’ infection prevention objectives.
AB - Background. Worldwide, hospitals are required to prioritize the culture of quality in infection prevention (CQIP) for patient safety. Assessing CQIP is crucial, but there is limited research, especially regarding nurses’ perceptions. Insufficient information exists due to scarcity of validated instruments in local languages to measure CQIP internationally. Purpose. This study assessed the “Leading a Culture of Quality in Infection Prevention Scale” Russian version’s (LCQ-IPS-R) validity and reliability to assess the CQIP of hospitals in Kazakhstan based on nurses’ perceptions. Methods. This study utilized a methodological design and analyzed data from 204 nurses at the “National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health” in Astana City, Kazakhstan. The “cultural and linguistic adaptation” process involved a “forward-backward translation” technique. Content validity and construct validity were examined. Internal consistency reliability was explored for scale reliability. Results. The scale’s mean item range was from 3.56 (SD = 1.22) to 4.40 (SD = 0.85; SD = 0.92). The corrected item-total correlation ranged from 0.321 to 0.707. Six experts rated the I-CVI from 0.83 to 1.00, with an S-CVI/Ave of 0.90. The principal component analysis with Varimax rotation produced four distinct components of the LCQ-IPS-R, explaining 69.8% of the total variance. The tests of correlation between the LCQ-IPS-R’s four components revealed medium to large positive associations among the components (r = 0.25-0.55, p < 0.001 ). The computed α for the LCQ-IPS-R was 0.909 while α values from four subscales ranged from 0.809 to 0.921. Conclusions/Implications for Practice. This study provides evidence of the LCQ-IP-R’s reliability and validity in evaluating Russian-speaking nurses’ perception of their hospital’s CQIP. These findings open the door for further research on CQIP in healthcare settings in Kazakhstan, Central Asia, and other Russian-speaking countries. The scale provides essential baseline information to design effective interventions for achieving hospitals’ infection prevention objectives.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171854616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85171854616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2023/5309218
DO - 10.1155/2023/5309218
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85171854616
SN - 0966-0429
VL - 2023
JO - Journal of Nursing Management
JF - Journal of Nursing Management
M1 - 5309218
ER -