CADTH Rapid Response Reports: Non-Alcohol Based Hand Rubs: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

P. la Fleur, S. Jones

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Antisepsis that uses running water and an aqueous solution is usually referred to as a "scrub". Scrubs are commonly used by surgical staff for hand antisepsis during pre-surgical preparation, and contain agents, such as chlorhexidine gluconate or povidone iodine. Scrubbing involves wetting the hands and forearms with water, systematically applying the scrub solution using hands or sponges and rinsing under running water. This process typically takes up to six minutes. The term "rub" usually refers to hand antisepsis procedures and products that do not require running water. The most commonly used rub products contain at least 60% alcohol (v/v). Alcohol-based rubs have a well-established role in infection control strategy in healthcare settings for routine hand sanitization,(1-4) including hospitals, outpatient clinics, laboratory settings, community settings and for hand sanitization in surgical contexts.(5-8) The ubiquitous usage of alcohol-based rubs is based on evidence for reduced infectious transmission, low cost, and their high acceptability and tolerability relative to other methods of sanitization.(9,10) Nevertheless, there have been some concerns associated with the usage of alcohol-based hand sanitizers, such as religious objections, abuse potential, and flammability.(3) These concerns, combined with a desire to optimize infection control and user acceptability, has led to the development of several non-alcohol based hand rub products. These products use antimicrobial agents such as triclosan, chlorhexidine, iodophors or quaternary ammonium compounds; various combinations and formulations have been developed (e.g., water-based, foams, gels, nanocapsules).(11,12) The purpose of this report is to review the evidence regarding the effectiveness of non-alcohol based hand sanitizer (rubs) for reducing infection rates and infection transmission in the healthcare setting for both healthcare workers and non-healthcare personnel. Another objective of this report is to summarize evidence-based guidelines regarding the use of non-alcohol based hand rubs.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCADTH Rapid Response Reports
Place of PublicationOttawa (ON)
PublisherCanadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in HealthCopyright (c) 2017 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Hand
Antisepsis
Guidelines
Hand Sanitizers
Alcohols
Water
Hand Disinfection
Infection Control
Delivery of Health Care
Iodophors
Nanocapsules
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds
Triclosan
Hospital Outpatient Clinics
Povidone-Iodine
Infectious Disease Transmission
Chlorhexidine
Porifera
Anti-Infective Agents
Forearm

Cite this

la Fleur, P., & Jones, S. (2017). CADTH Rapid Response Reports: Non-Alcohol Based Hand Rubs: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines. In CADTH Rapid Response Reports Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in HealthCopyright (c) 2017 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health..

CADTH Rapid Response Reports : Non-Alcohol Based Hand Rubs: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines. / la Fleur, P.; Jones, S.

CADTH Rapid Response Reports. Ottawa (ON) : Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in HealthCopyright (c) 2017 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health., 2017.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

la Fleur, P & Jones, S 2017, CADTH Rapid Response Reports: Non-Alcohol Based Hand Rubs: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines. in CADTH Rapid Response Reports. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in HealthCopyright (c) 2017 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health., Ottawa (ON).
la Fleur P, Jones S. CADTH Rapid Response Reports: Non-Alcohol Based Hand Rubs: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines. In CADTH Rapid Response Reports. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in HealthCopyright (c) 2017 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. 2017
la Fleur, P. ; Jones, S. / CADTH Rapid Response Reports : Non-Alcohol Based Hand Rubs: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines. CADTH Rapid Response Reports. Ottawa (ON) : Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in HealthCopyright (c) 2017 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health., 2017.
@inbook{fa5097a71c074fddae9b9c83c3dad03e,
title = "CADTH Rapid Response Reports: Non-Alcohol Based Hand Rubs: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines",
abstract = "Antisepsis that uses running water and an aqueous solution is usually referred to as a {"}scrub{"}. Scrubs are commonly used by surgical staff for hand antisepsis during pre-surgical preparation, and contain agents, such as chlorhexidine gluconate or povidone iodine. Scrubbing involves wetting the hands and forearms with water, systematically applying the scrub solution using hands or sponges and rinsing under running water. This process typically takes up to six minutes. The term {"}rub{"} usually refers to hand antisepsis procedures and products that do not require running water. The most commonly used rub products contain at least 60{\%} alcohol (v/v). Alcohol-based rubs have a well-established role in infection control strategy in healthcare settings for routine hand sanitization,(1-4) including hospitals, outpatient clinics, laboratory settings, community settings and for hand sanitization in surgical contexts.(5-8) The ubiquitous usage of alcohol-based rubs is based on evidence for reduced infectious transmission, low cost, and their high acceptability and tolerability relative to other methods of sanitization.(9,10) Nevertheless, there have been some concerns associated with the usage of alcohol-based hand sanitizers, such as religious objections, abuse potential, and flammability.(3) These concerns, combined with a desire to optimize infection control and user acceptability, has led to the development of several non-alcohol based hand rub products. These products use antimicrobial agents such as triclosan, chlorhexidine, iodophors or quaternary ammonium compounds; various combinations and formulations have been developed (e.g., water-based, foams, gels, nanocapsules).(11,12) The purpose of this report is to review the evidence regarding the effectiveness of non-alcohol based hand sanitizer (rubs) for reducing infection rates and infection transmission in the healthcare setting for both healthcare workers and non-healthcare personnel. Another objective of this report is to summarize evidence-based guidelines regarding the use of non-alcohol based hand rubs.",
author = "{la Fleur}, P. and S. Jones",
note = "la Fleur, Philip Jones, Sarah Review Book NBK470501 [bookaccession]",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
booktitle = "CADTH Rapid Response Reports",
publisher = "Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in HealthCopyright (c) 2017 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - CADTH Rapid Response Reports

T2 - Non-Alcohol Based Hand Rubs: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines

AU - la Fleur, P.

AU - Jones, S.

N1 - la Fleur, Philip Jones, Sarah Review Book NBK470501 [bookaccession]

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Antisepsis that uses running water and an aqueous solution is usually referred to as a "scrub". Scrubs are commonly used by surgical staff for hand antisepsis during pre-surgical preparation, and contain agents, such as chlorhexidine gluconate or povidone iodine. Scrubbing involves wetting the hands and forearms with water, systematically applying the scrub solution using hands or sponges and rinsing under running water. This process typically takes up to six minutes. The term "rub" usually refers to hand antisepsis procedures and products that do not require running water. The most commonly used rub products contain at least 60% alcohol (v/v). Alcohol-based rubs have a well-established role in infection control strategy in healthcare settings for routine hand sanitization,(1-4) including hospitals, outpatient clinics, laboratory settings, community settings and for hand sanitization in surgical contexts.(5-8) The ubiquitous usage of alcohol-based rubs is based on evidence for reduced infectious transmission, low cost, and their high acceptability and tolerability relative to other methods of sanitization.(9,10) Nevertheless, there have been some concerns associated with the usage of alcohol-based hand sanitizers, such as religious objections, abuse potential, and flammability.(3) These concerns, combined with a desire to optimize infection control and user acceptability, has led to the development of several non-alcohol based hand rub products. These products use antimicrobial agents such as triclosan, chlorhexidine, iodophors or quaternary ammonium compounds; various combinations and formulations have been developed (e.g., water-based, foams, gels, nanocapsules).(11,12) The purpose of this report is to review the evidence regarding the effectiveness of non-alcohol based hand sanitizer (rubs) for reducing infection rates and infection transmission in the healthcare setting for both healthcare workers and non-healthcare personnel. Another objective of this report is to summarize evidence-based guidelines regarding the use of non-alcohol based hand rubs.

AB - Antisepsis that uses running water and an aqueous solution is usually referred to as a "scrub". Scrubs are commonly used by surgical staff for hand antisepsis during pre-surgical preparation, and contain agents, such as chlorhexidine gluconate or povidone iodine. Scrubbing involves wetting the hands and forearms with water, systematically applying the scrub solution using hands or sponges and rinsing under running water. This process typically takes up to six minutes. The term "rub" usually refers to hand antisepsis procedures and products that do not require running water. The most commonly used rub products contain at least 60% alcohol (v/v). Alcohol-based rubs have a well-established role in infection control strategy in healthcare settings for routine hand sanitization,(1-4) including hospitals, outpatient clinics, laboratory settings, community settings and for hand sanitization in surgical contexts.(5-8) The ubiquitous usage of alcohol-based rubs is based on evidence for reduced infectious transmission, low cost, and their high acceptability and tolerability relative to other methods of sanitization.(9,10) Nevertheless, there have been some concerns associated with the usage of alcohol-based hand sanitizers, such as religious objections, abuse potential, and flammability.(3) These concerns, combined with a desire to optimize infection control and user acceptability, has led to the development of several non-alcohol based hand rub products. These products use antimicrobial agents such as triclosan, chlorhexidine, iodophors or quaternary ammonium compounds; various combinations and formulations have been developed (e.g., water-based, foams, gels, nanocapsules).(11,12) The purpose of this report is to review the evidence regarding the effectiveness of non-alcohol based hand sanitizer (rubs) for reducing infection rates and infection transmission in the healthcare setting for both healthcare workers and non-healthcare personnel. Another objective of this report is to summarize evidence-based guidelines regarding the use of non-alcohol based hand rubs.

M3 - Chapter

BT - CADTH Rapid Response Reports

PB - Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in HealthCopyright (c) 2017 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.

CY - Ottawa (ON)

ER -