Can a Constitutional Monarch Influence Democratic Preferences?: The Regulation of Public Expression in Japan

Susumu Annaka; Gento Kato

doi:10.1111/ssqu.13152

Can a Constitutional Monarch Influence Democratic Preferences? The Regulation of Public Expression in Japan

Susumu Annaka, Gento Kato

Political Science and International Relations Department

Waseda University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study examines whether hereditary constitutional monarchs have any influence on democratic public opinion, focusing on the case of the Japanese emperor. Methods: A survey experiment on the regulation of public expression. This issue can be framed both as left wing (i.e., the regulation of hate speech) and right wing (i.e., the regulation of publicly funded anti-nationalistic exhibitions). Taking advantage of the dual nature of the issue, we test the effects of the emperor's endorsement on support for regulation under each ideological frame. Results: The (former) emperor's endorsement for freedom of expression does have a cross-cutting effect and decreases support for regulation. This effect is relatively small but statistically significant. Additionally, the findings provide weak evidence for the emperor's own ideological position conditioning his endorsement effect. Conclusion: Hereditary monarchs do influence democratic public opinion, and their influence can cross-cut ideology.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	699-708
Number of pages	9
Journal	Social Science Quarterly
Volume	103
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13152
Publication status	Published - May 2022

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI, grant number 18J10578 and 20K22079. The pre‐analysis plan for the analysis is registered at OSF https://osf.io/pkf7c (in Japanese, English translation in the Supporting Information Appendix ), and the experimental design received approval from the Academic Research Ethical Review Committee at Waseda University (approval number: 2019‐322). The replication files are available from Harvard Dataverse ( https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OOIRHH ). The authors would like to thank Munenori Kita, Masaru Kohno, Ikuo Kume, participants of the sessions at the 2021 Annual Meeting of the Japanese Association of Electoral Studies and the Modern and Contemporary Japanese Politics Research Forum (particularly Kiichiro Arai, Masaki Hata, Masaru Nishikawa, Shiro Sakaiya, Yuichiro Shimizu, Naoko Taniguchi, and Masahiro Zenkyo), and anonymous referees for their helpful comments. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI, grant number 18J10578 and 20K22079. The pre-analysis plan for the analysis is registered at OSF https://osf.io/pkf7c (in Japanese, English translation in the Supporting Information Appendix), and the experimental design received approval from the Academic Research Ethical Review Committee at Waseda University (approval number: 2019-322). The replication files are available from Harvard Dataverse (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OOIRHH). The authors would like to thank Munenori Kita, Masaru Kohno, Ikuo Kume, participants of the sessions at the 2021 Annual Meeting of the Japanese Association of Electoral Studies and the Modern and Contemporary Japanese Politics Research Forum (particularly Kiichiro Arai, Masaki Hata, Masaru Nishikawa, Shiro Sakaiya, Yuichiro Shimizu, Naoko Taniguchi, and Masahiro Zenkyo), and anonymous referees for their helpful comments.

Access to Document

10.1111/ssqu.13152

Cite this

@article{23332bb516a74de6a6014c94a18b0ba5,

title = "Can a Constitutional Monarch Influence Democratic Preferences?: The Regulation of Public Expression in Japan",

abstract = "Objective: This study examines whether hereditary constitutional monarchs have any influence on democratic public opinion, focusing on the case of the Japanese emperor. Methods: A survey experiment on the regulation of public expression. This issue can be framed both as left wing (i.e., the regulation of hate speech) and right wing (i.e., the regulation of publicly funded anti-nationalistic exhibitions). Taking advantage of the dual nature of the issue, we test the effects of the emperor's endorsement on support for regulation under each ideological frame. Results: The (former) emperor's endorsement for freedom of expression does have a cross-cutting effect and decreases support for regulation. This effect is relatively small but statistically significant. Additionally, the findings provide weak evidence for the emperor's own ideological position conditioning his endorsement effect. Conclusion: Hereditary monarchs do influence democratic public opinion, and their influence can cross-cut ideology.",

author = "Susumu Annaka and Gento Kato",

year = "2022",

month = may,

doi = "10.1111/ssqu.13152",

language = "English",

volume = "103",

pages = "699--708",

journal = "Social Science Quarterly",

issn = "0038-4941",

publisher = "Wiley Blackwell",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can a Constitutional Monarch Influence Democratic Preferences?

T2 - The Regulation of Public Expression in Japan

AU - Annaka, Susumu

AU - Kato, Gento

PY - 2022/5

Y1 - 2022/5

N2 - Objective: This study examines whether hereditary constitutional monarchs have any influence on democratic public opinion, focusing on the case of the Japanese emperor. Methods: A survey experiment on the regulation of public expression. This issue can be framed both as left wing (i.e., the regulation of hate speech) and right wing (i.e., the regulation of publicly funded anti-nationalistic exhibitions). Taking advantage of the dual nature of the issue, we test the effects of the emperor's endorsement on support for regulation under each ideological frame. Results: The (former) emperor's endorsement for freedom of expression does have a cross-cutting effect and decreases support for regulation. This effect is relatively small but statistically significant. Additionally, the findings provide weak evidence for the emperor's own ideological position conditioning his endorsement effect. Conclusion: Hereditary monarchs do influence democratic public opinion, and their influence can cross-cut ideology.

AB - Objective: This study examines whether hereditary constitutional monarchs have any influence on democratic public opinion, focusing on the case of the Japanese emperor. Methods: A survey experiment on the regulation of public expression. This issue can be framed both as left wing (i.e., the regulation of hate speech) and right wing (i.e., the regulation of publicly funded anti-nationalistic exhibitions). Taking advantage of the dual nature of the issue, we test the effects of the emperor's endorsement on support for regulation under each ideological frame. Results: The (former) emperor's endorsement for freedom of expression does have a cross-cutting effect and decreases support for regulation. This effect is relatively small but statistically significant. Additionally, the findings provide weak evidence for the emperor's own ideological position conditioning his endorsement effect. Conclusion: Hereditary monarchs do influence democratic public opinion, and their influence can cross-cut ideology.

U2 - 10.1111/ssqu.13152

DO - 10.1111/ssqu.13152

M3 - Article

SN - 0038-4941

VL - 103

SP - 699

EP - 708

JO - Social Science Quarterly

JF - Social Science Quarterly

IS - 3

ER -

Can a Constitutional Monarch Influence Democratic Preferences? The Regulation of Public Expression in Japan

Abstract

Funding

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this