Categorization of Mineral Resources Based on Different Geostatistical Simulation Algorithms

A Case Study from an Iron Ore Deposit

Nurassyl Battalgazy, Nasser Madani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Mineral resource classification plays an important role in the downstream activities of a mining project. Spatial modeling of the grade variability in a deposit directly impacts the evaluation of recovery functions, such as the tonnage, metal quantity and mean grade above cutoffs. The use of geostatistical simulations for this purpose is becoming popular among practitioners because they produce statistical parameters of the sample dataset in cases of global distribution (e.g., histograms) and local distribution (e.g., variograms). Conditional simulations can also be assessed to quantify the uncertainty within the blocks. In this sense, mineral resource classification based on obtained realizations leads to the likely computation of reliable recovery functions, showing the worst and best scenarios. However, applying the proper geostatistical (co)-simulation algorithms is critical in the case of modeling variables with strong cross-correlation structures. In this context, enhanced approaches such as projection pursuit multivariate transforms (PPMTs) are highly desirable. In this paper, the mineral resources in an iron ore deposit are computed and categorized employing the PPMT method, and then, the outputs are compared with conventional (co)-simulation methods for the reproduction of statistical parameters and for the calculation of tonnage at different levels of cutoff grades. The results show that the PPMT outperforms conventional (co)-simulation approaches not only in terms of local and global cross-correlation reproductions between two underlying grades (Fe and Al 2 O 3 ) in this iron deposit but also in terms of mineral resource categories according to the Joint Ore Reserves Committee standard.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNatural Resources Research
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

mineral resource
iron ore
ore deposit
transform
simulation
variogram
histogram
modeling
iron
metal
distribution
method
parameter

Keywords

  • Iron deposit
  • Joint simulation
  • JORC code
  • Mineral resource classification
  • Projection pursuit multivariate transform

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

@article{a0e1cf62acb342b7b9ab5945ed21f552,
title = "Categorization of Mineral Resources Based on Different Geostatistical Simulation Algorithms: A Case Study from an Iron Ore Deposit",
abstract = "Mineral resource classification plays an important role in the downstream activities of a mining project. Spatial modeling of the grade variability in a deposit directly impacts the evaluation of recovery functions, such as the tonnage, metal quantity and mean grade above cutoffs. The use of geostatistical simulations for this purpose is becoming popular among practitioners because they produce statistical parameters of the sample dataset in cases of global distribution (e.g., histograms) and local distribution (e.g., variograms). Conditional simulations can also be assessed to quantify the uncertainty within the blocks. In this sense, mineral resource classification based on obtained realizations leads to the likely computation of reliable recovery functions, showing the worst and best scenarios. However, applying the proper geostatistical (co)-simulation algorithms is critical in the case of modeling variables with strong cross-correlation structures. In this context, enhanced approaches such as projection pursuit multivariate transforms (PPMTs) are highly desirable. In this paper, the mineral resources in an iron ore deposit are computed and categorized employing the PPMT method, and then, the outputs are compared with conventional (co)-simulation methods for the reproduction of statistical parameters and for the calculation of tonnage at different levels of cutoff grades. The results show that the PPMT outperforms conventional (co)-simulation approaches not only in terms of local and global cross-correlation reproductions between two underlying grades (Fe and Al 2 O 3 ) in this iron deposit but also in terms of mineral resource categories according to the Joint Ore Reserves Committee standard.",
keywords = "Iron deposit, Joint simulation, JORC code, Mineral resource classification, Projection pursuit multivariate transform",
author = "Nurassyl Battalgazy and Nasser Madani",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11053-019-09474-9",
language = "English",
journal = "Natural Resources Research",
issn = "1520-7439",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Categorization of Mineral Resources Based on Different Geostatistical Simulation Algorithms

T2 - A Case Study from an Iron Ore Deposit

AU - Battalgazy, Nurassyl

AU - Madani, Nasser

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Mineral resource classification plays an important role in the downstream activities of a mining project. Spatial modeling of the grade variability in a deposit directly impacts the evaluation of recovery functions, such as the tonnage, metal quantity and mean grade above cutoffs. The use of geostatistical simulations for this purpose is becoming popular among practitioners because they produce statistical parameters of the sample dataset in cases of global distribution (e.g., histograms) and local distribution (e.g., variograms). Conditional simulations can also be assessed to quantify the uncertainty within the blocks. In this sense, mineral resource classification based on obtained realizations leads to the likely computation of reliable recovery functions, showing the worst and best scenarios. However, applying the proper geostatistical (co)-simulation algorithms is critical in the case of modeling variables with strong cross-correlation structures. In this context, enhanced approaches such as projection pursuit multivariate transforms (PPMTs) are highly desirable. In this paper, the mineral resources in an iron ore deposit are computed and categorized employing the PPMT method, and then, the outputs are compared with conventional (co)-simulation methods for the reproduction of statistical parameters and for the calculation of tonnage at different levels of cutoff grades. The results show that the PPMT outperforms conventional (co)-simulation approaches not only in terms of local and global cross-correlation reproductions between two underlying grades (Fe and Al 2 O 3 ) in this iron deposit but also in terms of mineral resource categories according to the Joint Ore Reserves Committee standard.

AB - Mineral resource classification plays an important role in the downstream activities of a mining project. Spatial modeling of the grade variability in a deposit directly impacts the evaluation of recovery functions, such as the tonnage, metal quantity and mean grade above cutoffs. The use of geostatistical simulations for this purpose is becoming popular among practitioners because they produce statistical parameters of the sample dataset in cases of global distribution (e.g., histograms) and local distribution (e.g., variograms). Conditional simulations can also be assessed to quantify the uncertainty within the blocks. In this sense, mineral resource classification based on obtained realizations leads to the likely computation of reliable recovery functions, showing the worst and best scenarios. However, applying the proper geostatistical (co)-simulation algorithms is critical in the case of modeling variables with strong cross-correlation structures. In this context, enhanced approaches such as projection pursuit multivariate transforms (PPMTs) are highly desirable. In this paper, the mineral resources in an iron ore deposit are computed and categorized employing the PPMT method, and then, the outputs are compared with conventional (co)-simulation methods for the reproduction of statistical parameters and for the calculation of tonnage at different levels of cutoff grades. The results show that the PPMT outperforms conventional (co)-simulation approaches not only in terms of local and global cross-correlation reproductions between two underlying grades (Fe and Al 2 O 3 ) in this iron deposit but also in terms of mineral resource categories according to the Joint Ore Reserves Committee standard.

KW - Iron deposit

KW - Joint simulation

KW - JORC code

KW - Mineral resource classification

KW - Projection pursuit multivariate transform

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062852778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062852778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11053-019-09474-9

DO - 10.1007/s11053-019-09474-9

M3 - Article

JO - Natural Resources Research

JF - Natural Resources Research

SN - 1520-7439

ER -