Colonial ties and civil conflict intervention: Clarifying the causal mechanisms

Mwita Chacha, Szymon Stojek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Civil war intervention literature identifies colonial history as influencing the likelihood of interventions. This literature, however, has yet to clarify the mechanisms through which colonial history influences interventions. We develop and test an argument linking the relations established by colonialism—economic, political, and social—with interventions. We find that colonial history influences interventions, but its effect matters less once we control for these three relations. Importantly, we find that this effect of colonial history is particularly small in dyads with stronger economic relations. Our paper gives further credence to liberal arguments emphasizing the role of economic factors in international security.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-62
Number of pages21
JournalConflict Management and Peace Science
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

history
international security
economic relations
dyad
economic factors
civil war
Civil conflict
Colonial history
literature
Dyads
Economic relations
Economic factors
Civil war

Keywords

  • Civil conflict intervention
  • colonial history
  • economic ties
  • political–strategic ties
  • social–cultural ties

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Colonial ties and civil conflict intervention : Clarifying the causal mechanisms. / Chacha, Mwita; Stojek, Szymon.

In: Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 42-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ff9818bc470f4a92b070492262690e13,
title = "Colonial ties and civil conflict intervention: Clarifying the causal mechanisms",
abstract = "Civil war intervention literature identifies colonial history as influencing the likelihood of interventions. This literature, however, has yet to clarify the mechanisms through which colonial history influences interventions. We develop and test an argument linking the relations established by colonialism—economic, political, and social—with interventions. We find that colonial history influences interventions, but its effect matters less once we control for these three relations. Importantly, we find that this effect of colonial history is particularly small in dyads with stronger economic relations. Our paper gives further credence to liberal arguments emphasizing the role of economic factors in international security.",
keywords = "Civil conflict intervention, colonial history, economic ties, political–strategic ties, social–cultural ties",
author = "Mwita Chacha and Szymon Stojek",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0738894216655514",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "42--62",
journal = "Conflict Management and Peace Science",
issn = "0738-8942",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Colonial ties and civil conflict intervention

T2 - Clarifying the causal mechanisms

AU - Chacha, Mwita

AU - Stojek, Szymon

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Civil war intervention literature identifies colonial history as influencing the likelihood of interventions. This literature, however, has yet to clarify the mechanisms through which colonial history influences interventions. We develop and test an argument linking the relations established by colonialism—economic, political, and social—with interventions. We find that colonial history influences interventions, but its effect matters less once we control for these three relations. Importantly, we find that this effect of colonial history is particularly small in dyads with stronger economic relations. Our paper gives further credence to liberal arguments emphasizing the role of economic factors in international security.

AB - Civil war intervention literature identifies colonial history as influencing the likelihood of interventions. This literature, however, has yet to clarify the mechanisms through which colonial history influences interventions. We develop and test an argument linking the relations established by colonialism—economic, political, and social—with interventions. We find that colonial history influences interventions, but its effect matters less once we control for these three relations. Importantly, we find that this effect of colonial history is particularly small in dyads with stronger economic relations. Our paper gives further credence to liberal arguments emphasizing the role of economic factors in international security.

KW - Civil conflict intervention

KW - colonial history

KW - economic ties

KW - political–strategic ties

KW - social–cultural ties

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059045934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059045934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0738894216655514

DO - 10.1177/0738894216655514

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 42

EP - 62

JO - Conflict Management and Peace Science

JF - Conflict Management and Peace Science

SN - 0738-8942

IS - 1

ER -