Comparison between landfill gas and waste incineration for power generation in Astana, Kazakhstan

Vassilis J. Inglezakis, Luis Rojas-Solórzano, Jong Kim, Aisulu Aitbekova, Aizada Ismailova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The city of Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan, which has a population of 804,474, and has been experiencing rapid growth over the last 15 years, generates approximately 1.39 kg capita-1 day-1 of municipal solid waste (MSW). Nearly 700 tonnes of MSW are collected daily, of which 97% is disposed of at landfills. The newest landfill was built using modern technologies, including a landfill gas (LFG) collection system. The rapid growth of Astana demands more energy on its path to development, and the viability analysis of MSW to generate electricity is imperative. This paper presents a technical-economic pre-feasibility study comparing landfill including LFG utilization and waste incineration (WI) to produce electricity. The performance of LFG with a reciprocating engine and WI with steam turbine power technologies were compared through corresponding greenhouse gases (GHG) reduction, cost of energy production (CEP), benefit-cost ratio (BCR), net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) from the analyses. Results demonstrate that in the city of Astana, WI has the potential to reduce more than 200,000 tonnes of GHG per year, while LFG could reduce slightly less than 40,000 tonnes. LFG offers a CEP 5.7% larger than WI, while the latter presents a BCR two times higher than LFG. WI technology analysis depicts a NPV exceeding 280% of the equity, while for LFG, the NPV is less than the equity, which indicates an expected remarkable financial return for the WI technology and a marginal and risky scenario for the LFG technology. Only existing landfill facilities with a LFG collection system in place may turn LFG into a viable project.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)486-494
Number of pages9
JournalWaste Management and Research
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 4 2015

Fingerprint

Waste incineration
Land fill
Power generation
Gases
Municipal solid waste
Greenhouse gases
Electricity
Costs
Steam turbines
Cost reduction

Keywords

  • Astana
  • electricity production
  • Kazakhstan
  • Landfill
  • municipal waste
  • waste incineration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Pollution

Cite this

Comparison between landfill gas and waste incineration for power generation in Astana, Kazakhstan. / Inglezakis, Vassilis J.; Rojas-Solórzano, Luis; Kim, Jong; Aitbekova, Aisulu; Ismailova, Aizada.

In: Waste Management and Research, Vol. 33, No. 5, 04.05.2015, p. 486-494.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{25c489f69dcc4d20b5b4a20baabb0afa,
title = "Comparison between landfill gas and waste incineration for power generation in Astana, Kazakhstan",
abstract = "The city of Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan, which has a population of 804,474, and has been experiencing rapid growth over the last 15 years, generates approximately 1.39 kg capita-1 day-1 of municipal solid waste (MSW). Nearly 700 tonnes of MSW are collected daily, of which 97{\%} is disposed of at landfills. The newest landfill was built using modern technologies, including a landfill gas (LFG) collection system. The rapid growth of Astana demands more energy on its path to development, and the viability analysis of MSW to generate electricity is imperative. This paper presents a technical-economic pre-feasibility study comparing landfill including LFG utilization and waste incineration (WI) to produce electricity. The performance of LFG with a reciprocating engine and WI with steam turbine power technologies were compared through corresponding greenhouse gases (GHG) reduction, cost of energy production (CEP), benefit-cost ratio (BCR), net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) from the analyses. Results demonstrate that in the city of Astana, WI has the potential to reduce more than 200,000 tonnes of GHG per year, while LFG could reduce slightly less than 40,000 tonnes. LFG offers a CEP 5.7{\%} larger than WI, while the latter presents a BCR two times higher than LFG. WI technology analysis depicts a NPV exceeding 280{\%} of the equity, while for LFG, the NPV is less than the equity, which indicates an expected remarkable financial return for the WI technology and a marginal and risky scenario for the LFG technology. Only existing landfill facilities with a LFG collection system in place may turn LFG into a viable project.",
keywords = "Astana, electricity production, Kazakhstan, Landfill, municipal waste, waste incineration",
author = "Inglezakis, {Vassilis J.} and Luis Rojas-Sol{\'o}rzano and Jong Kim and Aisulu Aitbekova and Aizada Ismailova",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0734242X15576562",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "486--494",
journal = "Waste Management and Research",
issn = "0734-242X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison between landfill gas and waste incineration for power generation in Astana, Kazakhstan

AU - Inglezakis, Vassilis J.

AU - Rojas-Solórzano, Luis

AU - Kim, Jong

AU - Aitbekova, Aisulu

AU - Ismailova, Aizada

PY - 2015/5/4

Y1 - 2015/5/4

N2 - The city of Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan, which has a population of 804,474, and has been experiencing rapid growth over the last 15 years, generates approximately 1.39 kg capita-1 day-1 of municipal solid waste (MSW). Nearly 700 tonnes of MSW are collected daily, of which 97% is disposed of at landfills. The newest landfill was built using modern technologies, including a landfill gas (LFG) collection system. The rapid growth of Astana demands more energy on its path to development, and the viability analysis of MSW to generate electricity is imperative. This paper presents a technical-economic pre-feasibility study comparing landfill including LFG utilization and waste incineration (WI) to produce electricity. The performance of LFG with a reciprocating engine and WI with steam turbine power technologies were compared through corresponding greenhouse gases (GHG) reduction, cost of energy production (CEP), benefit-cost ratio (BCR), net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) from the analyses. Results demonstrate that in the city of Astana, WI has the potential to reduce more than 200,000 tonnes of GHG per year, while LFG could reduce slightly less than 40,000 tonnes. LFG offers a CEP 5.7% larger than WI, while the latter presents a BCR two times higher than LFG. WI technology analysis depicts a NPV exceeding 280% of the equity, while for LFG, the NPV is less than the equity, which indicates an expected remarkable financial return for the WI technology and a marginal and risky scenario for the LFG technology. Only existing landfill facilities with a LFG collection system in place may turn LFG into a viable project.

AB - The city of Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan, which has a population of 804,474, and has been experiencing rapid growth over the last 15 years, generates approximately 1.39 kg capita-1 day-1 of municipal solid waste (MSW). Nearly 700 tonnes of MSW are collected daily, of which 97% is disposed of at landfills. The newest landfill was built using modern technologies, including a landfill gas (LFG) collection system. The rapid growth of Astana demands more energy on its path to development, and the viability analysis of MSW to generate electricity is imperative. This paper presents a technical-economic pre-feasibility study comparing landfill including LFG utilization and waste incineration (WI) to produce electricity. The performance of LFG with a reciprocating engine and WI with steam turbine power technologies were compared through corresponding greenhouse gases (GHG) reduction, cost of energy production (CEP), benefit-cost ratio (BCR), net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) from the analyses. Results demonstrate that in the city of Astana, WI has the potential to reduce more than 200,000 tonnes of GHG per year, while LFG could reduce slightly less than 40,000 tonnes. LFG offers a CEP 5.7% larger than WI, while the latter presents a BCR two times higher than LFG. WI technology analysis depicts a NPV exceeding 280% of the equity, while for LFG, the NPV is less than the equity, which indicates an expected remarkable financial return for the WI technology and a marginal and risky scenario for the LFG technology. Only existing landfill facilities with a LFG collection system in place may turn LFG into a viable project.

KW - Astana

KW - electricity production

KW - Kazakhstan

KW - Landfill

KW - municipal waste

KW - waste incineration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930509252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930509252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0734242X15576562

DO - 10.1177/0734242X15576562

M3 - Article

C2 - 25819927

AN - SCOPUS:84930509252

VL - 33

SP - 486

EP - 494

JO - Waste Management and Research

JF - Waste Management and Research

SN - 0734-242X

IS - 5

ER -