Comparison of Mn, Zn, and Cr removal in fluidized- and fixed-bed reactors by using clinoptilolite

M. A. Stylianou, V. J. Inglezakis, M. Loizidou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract: Natural minerals are used as sorbents in ion-exchange processes due to their high exchange capacity and their relatively low cost. In the present study the use of natural zeolite as filling medium in fixed- and fluidized-bed reactors for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions is investigated. The major objective is to compare the removal efficiency of heavy metals by the two processes—fluidized and fixed bed. Fixed and fluidized bed experiments were conducted in order to examine the Mn2+, Zn2+, and Cr3+ uptake by natural clinoptilolite, using the same critical experimental conditions: particle size (90–180 μm), volumetric flow rate of 12.48 BV/h, total normality of 0.01 N, initial pH value equal to 4, and ambient temperature (25°C). The fluidized bed process was conducted in an experimental 50 cm long plexiglass column of 4.4 cm internal diameter and fixed bed experiments in 70 cm long plexiglass columns of 2 cm internal diameter. The fluidized bed breakthrough curves for Mn2+ and Zn2+ are very similar with Cr to give the best results in terms of removal efficiency. In fixed bed the breakthrough curves are similar for all three metals, with Cr exhibiting slightly lower removal efficiency. Furthermore, the breakthrough points are shifted to the left (0–5 BV) in comparison to the fixed bed experiments (10 BV) for all metals. Comparing the two processes, it is concluded that fixed bed operation exhibits better results than the fluidized bed most probably due to better hydrodynamic conditions in the former.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3355-3362
Number of pages8
JournalDesalination and Water Treatment
Volume53
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 20 2015

Fingerprint

clinoptilolite
Fluidized beds
breakthrough curve
Heavy metals
Ion exchange
Fluidized bed process
heavy metal
experiment
Experiments
metal
Sorbents
Metals
zeolite
ion exchange
Minerals
Hydrodynamics
aqueous solution
hydrodynamics
Particle size
Flow rate

Keywords

  • Fixed bed
  • Fluidized bed
  • Heavy metals
  • Ion-exchange
  • Zeolite

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pollution
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Ocean Engineering

Cite this

Comparison of Mn, Zn, and Cr removal in fluidized- and fixed-bed reactors by using clinoptilolite. / Stylianou, M. A.; Inglezakis, V. J.; Loizidou, M.

In: Desalination and Water Treatment, Vol. 53, No. 12, 20.03.2015, p. 3355-3362.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fb68a4f1c15348ef8cc7a28d0bd1ccbf,
title = "Comparison of Mn, Zn, and Cr removal in fluidized- and fixed-bed reactors by using clinoptilolite",
abstract = "Abstract: Natural minerals are used as sorbents in ion-exchange processes due to their high exchange capacity and their relatively low cost. In the present study the use of natural zeolite as filling medium in fixed- and fluidized-bed reactors for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions is investigated. The major objective is to compare the removal efficiency of heavy metals by the two processes—fluidized and fixed bed. Fixed and fluidized bed experiments were conducted in order to examine the Mn2+, Zn2+, and Cr3+ uptake by natural clinoptilolite, using the same critical experimental conditions: particle size (90–180 μm), volumetric flow rate of 12.48 BV/h, total normality of 0.01 N, initial pH value equal to 4, and ambient temperature (25°C). The fluidized bed process was conducted in an experimental 50 cm long plexiglass column of 4.4 cm internal diameter and fixed bed experiments in 70 cm long plexiglass columns of 2 cm internal diameter. The fluidized bed breakthrough curves for Mn2+ and Zn2+ are very similar with Cr to give the best results in terms of removal efficiency. In fixed bed the breakthrough curves are similar for all three metals, with Cr exhibiting slightly lower removal efficiency. Furthermore, the breakthrough points are shifted to the left (0–5 BV) in comparison to the fixed bed experiments (10 BV) for all metals. Comparing the two processes, it is concluded that fixed bed operation exhibits better results than the fluidized bed most probably due to better hydrodynamic conditions in the former.",
keywords = "Fixed bed, Fluidized bed, Heavy metals, Ion-exchange, Zeolite",
author = "Stylianou, {M. A.} and Inglezakis, {V. J.} and M. Loizidou",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/19443994.2014.934103",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "3355--3362",
journal = "Desalination and Water Treatment",
issn = "1944-3994",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Mn, Zn, and Cr removal in fluidized- and fixed-bed reactors by using clinoptilolite

AU - Stylianou, M. A.

AU - Inglezakis, V. J.

AU - Loizidou, M.

PY - 2015/3/20

Y1 - 2015/3/20

N2 - Abstract: Natural minerals are used as sorbents in ion-exchange processes due to their high exchange capacity and their relatively low cost. In the present study the use of natural zeolite as filling medium in fixed- and fluidized-bed reactors for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions is investigated. The major objective is to compare the removal efficiency of heavy metals by the two processes—fluidized and fixed bed. Fixed and fluidized bed experiments were conducted in order to examine the Mn2+, Zn2+, and Cr3+ uptake by natural clinoptilolite, using the same critical experimental conditions: particle size (90–180 μm), volumetric flow rate of 12.48 BV/h, total normality of 0.01 N, initial pH value equal to 4, and ambient temperature (25°C). The fluidized bed process was conducted in an experimental 50 cm long plexiglass column of 4.4 cm internal diameter and fixed bed experiments in 70 cm long plexiglass columns of 2 cm internal diameter. The fluidized bed breakthrough curves for Mn2+ and Zn2+ are very similar with Cr to give the best results in terms of removal efficiency. In fixed bed the breakthrough curves are similar for all three metals, with Cr exhibiting slightly lower removal efficiency. Furthermore, the breakthrough points are shifted to the left (0–5 BV) in comparison to the fixed bed experiments (10 BV) for all metals. Comparing the two processes, it is concluded that fixed bed operation exhibits better results than the fluidized bed most probably due to better hydrodynamic conditions in the former.

AB - Abstract: Natural minerals are used as sorbents in ion-exchange processes due to their high exchange capacity and their relatively low cost. In the present study the use of natural zeolite as filling medium in fixed- and fluidized-bed reactors for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions is investigated. The major objective is to compare the removal efficiency of heavy metals by the two processes—fluidized and fixed bed. Fixed and fluidized bed experiments were conducted in order to examine the Mn2+, Zn2+, and Cr3+ uptake by natural clinoptilolite, using the same critical experimental conditions: particle size (90–180 μm), volumetric flow rate of 12.48 BV/h, total normality of 0.01 N, initial pH value equal to 4, and ambient temperature (25°C). The fluidized bed process was conducted in an experimental 50 cm long plexiglass column of 4.4 cm internal diameter and fixed bed experiments in 70 cm long plexiglass columns of 2 cm internal diameter. The fluidized bed breakthrough curves for Mn2+ and Zn2+ are very similar with Cr to give the best results in terms of removal efficiency. In fixed bed the breakthrough curves are similar for all three metals, with Cr exhibiting slightly lower removal efficiency. Furthermore, the breakthrough points are shifted to the left (0–5 BV) in comparison to the fixed bed experiments (10 BV) for all metals. Comparing the two processes, it is concluded that fixed bed operation exhibits better results than the fluidized bed most probably due to better hydrodynamic conditions in the former.

KW - Fixed bed

KW - Fluidized bed

KW - Heavy metals

KW - Ion-exchange

KW - Zeolite

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923580145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923580145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19443994.2014.934103

DO - 10.1080/19443994.2014.934103

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 3355

EP - 3362

JO - Desalination and Water Treatment

JF - Desalination and Water Treatment

SN - 1944-3994

IS - 12

ER -