Deal or no deal? decision making under risk in a large-payoff game show

Thierry Post, Martijn J. Van Den Assem, Guido Baltussen, Richard H. Thaler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

149 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examine the risky choices of contestants in the popular TV game show "Deal or No Deal" and related classroom experiments. Contrary to the traditional view of expected utility theory, the choices can be explained in large part by previous outcomes experienced during the game. Risk aversion decreases after earlier expectations have been shattered by unfavorable outcomes or surpassed by favorable outcomes. Our results point to reference-dependent choice theories such as prospect theory, and suggest that path-dependence is relevant, even when the choice problems are simple and well defined, and when large real monetary amounts are at stake.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-71
Number of pages34
JournalAmerican Economic Review
Volume98
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision making under risk
Path dependence
Prospect theory
Risky choice
Expected utility theory
Classroom experiments
Choice theory
Risk aversion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Deal or no deal? decision making under risk in a large-payoff game show. / Post, Thierry; Van Den Assem, Martijn J.; Baltussen, Guido; Thaler, Richard H.

In: American Economic Review, Vol. 98, No. 1, 03.2008, p. 38-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Post, Thierry ; Van Den Assem, Martijn J. ; Baltussen, Guido ; Thaler, Richard H. / Deal or no deal? decision making under risk in a large-payoff game show. In: American Economic Review. 2008 ; Vol. 98, No. 1. pp. 38-71.
@article{7f10dc576be8431d9e04c1e04362d474,
title = "Deal or no deal? decision making under risk in a large-payoff game show",
abstract = "We examine the risky choices of contestants in the popular TV game show {"}Deal or No Deal{"} and related classroom experiments. Contrary to the traditional view of expected utility theory, the choices can be explained in large part by previous outcomes experienced during the game. Risk aversion decreases after earlier expectations have been shattered by unfavorable outcomes or surpassed by favorable outcomes. Our results point to reference-dependent choice theories such as prospect theory, and suggest that path-dependence is relevant, even when the choice problems are simple and well defined, and when large real monetary amounts are at stake.",
author = "Thierry Post and {Van Den Assem}, {Martijn J.} and Guido Baltussen and Thaler, {Richard H.}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1257/aer.98.1.38",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "38--71",
journal = "American Economic Review",
issn = "0002-8282",
publisher = "American Economic Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deal or no deal? decision making under risk in a large-payoff game show

AU - Post, Thierry

AU - Van Den Assem, Martijn J.

AU - Baltussen, Guido

AU - Thaler, Richard H.

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - We examine the risky choices of contestants in the popular TV game show "Deal or No Deal" and related classroom experiments. Contrary to the traditional view of expected utility theory, the choices can be explained in large part by previous outcomes experienced during the game. Risk aversion decreases after earlier expectations have been shattered by unfavorable outcomes or surpassed by favorable outcomes. Our results point to reference-dependent choice theories such as prospect theory, and suggest that path-dependence is relevant, even when the choice problems are simple and well defined, and when large real monetary amounts are at stake.

AB - We examine the risky choices of contestants in the popular TV game show "Deal or No Deal" and related classroom experiments. Contrary to the traditional view of expected utility theory, the choices can be explained in large part by previous outcomes experienced during the game. Risk aversion decreases after earlier expectations have been shattered by unfavorable outcomes or surpassed by favorable outcomes. Our results point to reference-dependent choice theories such as prospect theory, and suggest that path-dependence is relevant, even when the choice problems are simple and well defined, and when large real monetary amounts are at stake.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41849142005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41849142005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1257/aer.98.1.38

DO - 10.1257/aer.98.1.38

M3 - Article

VL - 98

SP - 38

EP - 71

JO - American Economic Review

JF - American Economic Review

SN - 0002-8282

IS - 1

ER -