Defensive medicine: It is time to finally slow down an epidemic

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Defensive medicine is widespread and practiced the world over, with serious consequences for patients, doctors, and healthcare costs. Even students and residents are exposed to defensive medicine practices and taught to take malpractice liability into consideration when making clinical decisions. Defensive medicine is generally thought to stem from physicians' perception that they can easily be sued by patients or their relatives who seek compensation for presumed medical errors. However, in our view the growth of defensive medicine should be seen in the context of larger changes in the conception of medicine that have taken place in the last few decades, undermining the patient-physician trust, which has traditionally been the main source of professional satisfaction for physicians. These changes include the following: time directly spent with patients has been overtaken by time devoted to electronic health records and desk work; family doctors have played a progressively less central role; clinical reasoning is being replaced by guidelines and algorithms; the public at large and a number of young physicians tend to believe that medicine is a perfect science rather than an imperfect art, as it continues to be; and modern societies do not tolerate the inevitable morbidity and mortality. To finally reduce the increasing defensive behavior of doctors around the world, the decriminalization of medical errors and the assurance that they can be dealt with in civil courts or by medical organizations in all countries could help but it would not suffice. Physicians and surgeons should be allowed to spend the time they need with their patients and should give clinical reasoning the importance it deserves. The institutions should support the doctors who have experienced adverse patient events, and the media should stop reporting with excessive evidence presumed medical errors and subject physicians to "public trials" before they are eventually judged in court.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)406-409
Number of pages4
JournalWorld Journal of Clinical Cases
Volume6
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Defensive Medicine
Physicians
Medical Errors
Medicine
Electronic Health Records
Malpractice
Art
Compensation and Redress
Health Care Costs
Organizations
Guidelines
Students
Morbidity
Mortality
Growth

Keywords

  • Adverse event
  • Clinical reasoning
  • Defensive medicine
  • Doctor-patient relationship
  • Healthcare cost
  • Medical education
  • Medical error

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Defensive medicine : It is time to finally slow down an epidemic. / Vento, Sandro; Cainelli, Francesca; Vallone, Alfredo.

In: World Journal of Clinical Cases, Vol. 6, No. 11, 01.01.2018, p. 406-409.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

@article{15faae2f74a84153be5902a5565fd3a3,
title = "Defensive medicine: It is time to finally slow down an epidemic",
abstract = "Defensive medicine is widespread and practiced the world over, with serious consequences for patients, doctors, and healthcare costs. Even students and residents are exposed to defensive medicine practices and taught to take malpractice liability into consideration when making clinical decisions. Defensive medicine is generally thought to stem from physicians' perception that they can easily be sued by patients or their relatives who seek compensation for presumed medical errors. However, in our view the growth of defensive medicine should be seen in the context of larger changes in the conception of medicine that have taken place in the last few decades, undermining the patient-physician trust, which has traditionally been the main source of professional satisfaction for physicians. These changes include the following: time directly spent with patients has been overtaken by time devoted to electronic health records and desk work; family doctors have played a progressively less central role; clinical reasoning is being replaced by guidelines and algorithms; the public at large and a number of young physicians tend to believe that medicine is a perfect science rather than an imperfect art, as it continues to be; and modern societies do not tolerate the inevitable morbidity and mortality. To finally reduce the increasing defensive behavior of doctors around the world, the decriminalization of medical errors and the assurance that they can be dealt with in civil courts or by medical organizations in all countries could help but it would not suffice. Physicians and surgeons should be allowed to spend the time they need with their patients and should give clinical reasoning the importance it deserves. The institutions should support the doctors who have experienced adverse patient events, and the media should stop reporting with excessive evidence presumed medical errors and subject physicians to {"}public trials{"} before they are eventually judged in court.",
keywords = "Adverse event, Clinical reasoning, Defensive medicine, Doctor-patient relationship, Healthcare cost, Medical education, Medical error",
author = "Sandro Vento and Francesca Cainelli and Alfredo Vallone",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.12998/WJCC.V6.I11.406",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "406--409",
journal = "World Journal of Clinical Cases",
issn = "2307-8960",
publisher = "Baishideng Publishing Group",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defensive medicine

T2 - It is time to finally slow down an epidemic

AU - Vento, Sandro

AU - Cainelli, Francesca

AU - Vallone, Alfredo

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Defensive medicine is widespread and practiced the world over, with serious consequences for patients, doctors, and healthcare costs. Even students and residents are exposed to defensive medicine practices and taught to take malpractice liability into consideration when making clinical decisions. Defensive medicine is generally thought to stem from physicians' perception that they can easily be sued by patients or their relatives who seek compensation for presumed medical errors. However, in our view the growth of defensive medicine should be seen in the context of larger changes in the conception of medicine that have taken place in the last few decades, undermining the patient-physician trust, which has traditionally been the main source of professional satisfaction for physicians. These changes include the following: time directly spent with patients has been overtaken by time devoted to electronic health records and desk work; family doctors have played a progressively less central role; clinical reasoning is being replaced by guidelines and algorithms; the public at large and a number of young physicians tend to believe that medicine is a perfect science rather than an imperfect art, as it continues to be; and modern societies do not tolerate the inevitable morbidity and mortality. To finally reduce the increasing defensive behavior of doctors around the world, the decriminalization of medical errors and the assurance that they can be dealt with in civil courts or by medical organizations in all countries could help but it would not suffice. Physicians and surgeons should be allowed to spend the time they need with their patients and should give clinical reasoning the importance it deserves. The institutions should support the doctors who have experienced adverse patient events, and the media should stop reporting with excessive evidence presumed medical errors and subject physicians to "public trials" before they are eventually judged in court.

AB - Defensive medicine is widespread and practiced the world over, with serious consequences for patients, doctors, and healthcare costs. Even students and residents are exposed to defensive medicine practices and taught to take malpractice liability into consideration when making clinical decisions. Defensive medicine is generally thought to stem from physicians' perception that they can easily be sued by patients or their relatives who seek compensation for presumed medical errors. However, in our view the growth of defensive medicine should be seen in the context of larger changes in the conception of medicine that have taken place in the last few decades, undermining the patient-physician trust, which has traditionally been the main source of professional satisfaction for physicians. These changes include the following: time directly spent with patients has been overtaken by time devoted to electronic health records and desk work; family doctors have played a progressively less central role; clinical reasoning is being replaced by guidelines and algorithms; the public at large and a number of young physicians tend to believe that medicine is a perfect science rather than an imperfect art, as it continues to be; and modern societies do not tolerate the inevitable morbidity and mortality. To finally reduce the increasing defensive behavior of doctors around the world, the decriminalization of medical errors and the assurance that they can be dealt with in civil courts or by medical organizations in all countries could help but it would not suffice. Physicians and surgeons should be allowed to spend the time they need with their patients and should give clinical reasoning the importance it deserves. The institutions should support the doctors who have experienced adverse patient events, and the media should stop reporting with excessive evidence presumed medical errors and subject physicians to "public trials" before they are eventually judged in court.

KW - Adverse event

KW - Clinical reasoning

KW - Defensive medicine

KW - Doctor-patient relationship

KW - Healthcare cost

KW - Medical education

KW - Medical error

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062368647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062368647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.12998/WJCC.V6.I11.406

DO - 10.12998/WJCC.V6.I11.406

M3 - Editorial

AN - SCOPUS:85062368647

VL - 6

SP - 406

EP - 409

JO - World Journal of Clinical Cases

JF - World Journal of Clinical Cases

SN - 2307-8960

IS - 11

ER -