Defining remission in rheumatoid arthritis: Does it matter to the patient? A comparison of multi-dimensional remission criteria and patient reported outcomes

Hanna L. Gul, Gisella Eugenio, Thibault Rabin, Agata Burska, Rekha Parmar, Jianhua Wu, Frederique Ponchel, Paul Emery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: In a cross-sectional study, we evaluated the prevalence of 'multi-dimensional remission' (MDR) and its component parameters, assessed using objective measures in a cohort of RA patients in treatment-induced DAS28-remission, and their relationship with patient-reported outcome measures. We sought to confirm the feasibility and face validity of the MDR construct, providing a platform for future longitudinal studies in which its clinical utility might be further established. Methods: 605 patients were selected from an inflammatory arthritis register using DAS28(CRP)<2.6. Demographic, clinical and patients reported outcomes (PRO) data were collected. Ultrasound power doppler synovitis (n = 364) and T-cell subsets (n = 297) were also measured. Remission using clinical parameters was defined as: tender and swollen joint count (TJC/SJC) and CRP all ≤1; ultrasound remission: total power doppler = 0 and T cell remission: positive normalized naïve T-cell frequency. MDR was defined as the achievement of all three dimensions. Results: Overall, only 53% (321/605) of the patients achieved clinical parameters, failures being mainly due to raised CRP (52%), TJC (28)>1 (37%) or SJC (28)>1 (16%). 211/364 (58%) of patients achieved ultrasound remission and 193/297 (65%) patients showed T-cell remission. Complete data were available for 231 patients. MDR was observed in only 35% and was associated with the best (lower) PRO scores (all P ≤ 0.05 vs non-MDR) when compared with the other definitions of remission assessed. The MDR rate was similar in early and established RA patients on b-DMARDs; however, it was lower in established RA patients who received multiple cs-DMARDs (P = 0.011). Conclusions: In this study, MDR, which may represent a state closer to normality, was found to occur in about a third of DAS28-remission patients and was associated with better patient-reported outcome measures. MDR could be a novel optimal treatment target, notably from a patient's perspective. The relevance of these findings needs further assessment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)613-621
Number of pages9
JournalRheumatology (United Kingdom)
Volume59
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2020

Keywords

  • disease activity
  • patient-reported outcomes
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • T cells
  • ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Defining remission in rheumatoid arthritis: Does it matter to the patient? A comparison of multi-dimensional remission criteria and patient reported outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this