TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and validation of a novel process model for fluidized bed combustion
T2 - Application for efficient combustion of low-grade coal
AU - Saparov, Ablay
AU - Kulmukanova, Lyazzat
AU - Mostafavi, Ehsan
AU - Sarbassov, Yerbol
AU - Inglezakis, Vassilis
AU - Anthony, Edward J.
AU - Shah, Dhawal
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by Nazarbayev University under the project number SOE2019011 (Project name: “Co‐Firing of Coal and Biomass Under Air and Oxy‐Fuel Environment in Fluidized Bed Rig: Experiments with Process Model Development”) and the ORAU project (contract no: 3‐2020/003‐2020; “Development of MSW Combustion and Incineration Technology for Astana (Kazakhstan) and Investigation of MSW Blending Effects on Reactivity of Coals in CFB Combustion and Gasification Process”) for operating the pilot‐scale circulating fluidized bed reactor and for the computational resources. mf
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Numerous models have been developed in Aspen Plus for the combustion of different coal types in fluidized bed reactors. However, these models are case-specific, particularly with respect to coal type and bed reactor type, implying limitations to general application of these models. Moreover, these processes were generally developed step-wisely by employing a series of model blocks to simulate fluidized bed reactors in Aspen Plus. In this study, a novel hybrid approach for modelling coal combustion has been implemented to comprehensively design a model for conversion of low-grade coal under various operating conditions. The proposed model combines sequential modelling of drying/pyrolysis (devolatilization) and combustion of coal by means of conventionally used units (RYIELD and RGIBBS), and a newly used unit (FLUIDBED) in Aspen Plus. The model validation was performed by experiments on the combustion of low-grade coal in a pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed reactor (CFBR). Experimental data were used to further calibrate the Aspen Plus model and decrease model uncertainties. The results obtained from the developed simulation model were found to be in good agreement with the experimental data. Discrepancies of less than 15% were observed, in most of the predictions of molar fractions for the resultant flue gas composition, including NOx and SOx, emissions which were at ppm levels. As a result, the model can easily be used for design, scale-up, and simulation of coal combustion as well as for other feedstock like biomass in fluidized bed with process optimization based on sensitivity analysis.
AB - Numerous models have been developed in Aspen Plus for the combustion of different coal types in fluidized bed reactors. However, these models are case-specific, particularly with respect to coal type and bed reactor type, implying limitations to general application of these models. Moreover, these processes were generally developed step-wisely by employing a series of model blocks to simulate fluidized bed reactors in Aspen Plus. In this study, a novel hybrid approach for modelling coal combustion has been implemented to comprehensively design a model for conversion of low-grade coal under various operating conditions. The proposed model combines sequential modelling of drying/pyrolysis (devolatilization) and combustion of coal by means of conventionally used units (RYIELD and RGIBBS), and a newly used unit (FLUIDBED) in Aspen Plus. The model validation was performed by experiments on the combustion of low-grade coal in a pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed reactor (CFBR). Experimental data were used to further calibrate the Aspen Plus model and decrease model uncertainties. The results obtained from the developed simulation model were found to be in good agreement with the experimental data. Discrepancies of less than 15% were observed, in most of the predictions of molar fractions for the resultant flue gas composition, including NOx and SOx, emissions which were at ppm levels. As a result, the model can easily be used for design, scale-up, and simulation of coal combustion as well as for other feedstock like biomass in fluidized bed with process optimization based on sensitivity analysis.
KW - aspen plus
KW - combustion
KW - fluidized bed
KW - low-grade coal
KW - process simulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096771022&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85096771022&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cjce.23896
DO - 10.1002/cjce.23896
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85096771022
SN - 0008-4034
VL - 99
SP - 1510
EP - 1519
JO - Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
JF - Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
IS - 7
ER -