Development of a Whole Life Cycle Cost Model for Electrification options on the UK Rail System

L. Kirkwood, L. Giuntini, E. Shehab, P. Baguley

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Projects to deliver Overhead Line Equipment (OLE) electrification on the UK rail infrastructure system presents technical challenges which the rail industry in Britain have not traditionally had to consider. Whole Life Cycle assessment provides decision makers with cost estimates for the installation phase and over the entire service life of the system, including disposal. The OLE projects face a particular problem when analysing the best option for overbridges. Much of the rail infrastructure has not traditionally had to consider overhead clearances and therefore many of the bridges are only a little taller than the rolling stock. In addition to the difficulties in assessing the Life-Cycle costs of assets that have historically been used in very limited scales, the Whole Life Cycle assessment must consider the various engineering options that are available for projects. The three competing options (bridge rebuild, track lowering, reduced clearance) are all going to have very different capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operating expenditure (OPEX) costs. This work presents a model created to predict these costs over the anticipated assessment period. The developed model predicts capital expenditures, maintenance and service disruption costs and links them to the three major assets options involved in OLE underbridges.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProcedia CIRP
PublisherElsevier B.V.
Pages1-5
Number of pages5
ISBN (Print)22128271 (ISSN)
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Publication series

NameProcedia CIRP
Volume47

Fingerprint

Life Cycle Stages
Capital Expenditures
Costs and Cost Analysis
Equipment and Supplies
Health Expenditures
Industry
Maintenance

Keywords

  • OLE
  • cost
  • rail maintenance
  • whole life cycle

Cite this

Kirkwood, L., Giuntini, L., Shehab, E., & Baguley, P. (2016). Development of a Whole Life Cycle Cost Model for Electrification options on the UK Rail System. In Procedia CIRP (pp. 1-5). (Procedia CIRP; Vol. 47). Elsevier B.V.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.067

Development of a Whole Life Cycle Cost Model for Electrification options on the UK Rail System. / Kirkwood, L.; Giuntini, L.; Shehab, E.; Baguley, P.

Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., 2016. p. 1-5 (Procedia CIRP; Vol. 47).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Kirkwood, L, Giuntini, L, Shehab, E & Baguley, P 2016, Development of a Whole Life Cycle Cost Model for Electrification options on the UK Rail System. in Procedia CIRP. Procedia CIRP, vol. 47, Elsevier B.V., pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.067
Kirkwood L, Giuntini L, Shehab E, Baguley P. Development of a Whole Life Cycle Cost Model for Electrification options on the UK Rail System. In Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V. 2016. p. 1-5. (Procedia CIRP). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.067
Kirkwood, L. ; Giuntini, L. ; Shehab, E. ; Baguley, P. / Development of a Whole Life Cycle Cost Model for Electrification options on the UK Rail System. Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., 2016. pp. 1-5 (Procedia CIRP).
@inbook{46e6d042b0b24599b148f701d2c75622,
title = "Development of a Whole Life Cycle Cost Model for Electrification options on the UK Rail System",
abstract = "Projects to deliver Overhead Line Equipment (OLE) electrification on the UK rail infrastructure system presents technical challenges which the rail industry in Britain have not traditionally had to consider. Whole Life Cycle assessment provides decision makers with cost estimates for the installation phase and over the entire service life of the system, including disposal. The OLE projects face a particular problem when analysing the best option for overbridges. Much of the rail infrastructure has not traditionally had to consider overhead clearances and therefore many of the bridges are only a little taller than the rolling stock. In addition to the difficulties in assessing the Life-Cycle costs of assets that have historically been used in very limited scales, the Whole Life Cycle assessment must consider the various engineering options that are available for projects. The three competing options (bridge rebuild, track lowering, reduced clearance) are all going to have very different capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operating expenditure (OPEX) costs. This work presents a model created to predict these costs over the anticipated assessment period. The developed model predicts capital expenditures, maintenance and service disruption costs and links them to the three major assets options involved in OLE underbridges.",
keywords = "OLE, cost, rail maintenance, whole life cycle",
author = "L. Kirkwood and L. Giuntini and E. Shehab and P. Baguley",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.067",
language = "English",
isbn = "22128271 (ISSN)",
series = "Procedia CIRP",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
pages = "1--5",
booktitle = "Procedia CIRP",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Development of a Whole Life Cycle Cost Model for Electrification options on the UK Rail System

AU - Kirkwood, L.

AU - Giuntini, L.

AU - Shehab, E.

AU - Baguley, P.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Projects to deliver Overhead Line Equipment (OLE) electrification on the UK rail infrastructure system presents technical challenges which the rail industry in Britain have not traditionally had to consider. Whole Life Cycle assessment provides decision makers with cost estimates for the installation phase and over the entire service life of the system, including disposal. The OLE projects face a particular problem when analysing the best option for overbridges. Much of the rail infrastructure has not traditionally had to consider overhead clearances and therefore many of the bridges are only a little taller than the rolling stock. In addition to the difficulties in assessing the Life-Cycle costs of assets that have historically been used in very limited scales, the Whole Life Cycle assessment must consider the various engineering options that are available for projects. The three competing options (bridge rebuild, track lowering, reduced clearance) are all going to have very different capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operating expenditure (OPEX) costs. This work presents a model created to predict these costs over the anticipated assessment period. The developed model predicts capital expenditures, maintenance and service disruption costs and links them to the three major assets options involved in OLE underbridges.

AB - Projects to deliver Overhead Line Equipment (OLE) electrification on the UK rail infrastructure system presents technical challenges which the rail industry in Britain have not traditionally had to consider. Whole Life Cycle assessment provides decision makers with cost estimates for the installation phase and over the entire service life of the system, including disposal. The OLE projects face a particular problem when analysing the best option for overbridges. Much of the rail infrastructure has not traditionally had to consider overhead clearances and therefore many of the bridges are only a little taller than the rolling stock. In addition to the difficulties in assessing the Life-Cycle costs of assets that have historically been used in very limited scales, the Whole Life Cycle assessment must consider the various engineering options that are available for projects. The three competing options (bridge rebuild, track lowering, reduced clearance) are all going to have very different capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operating expenditure (OPEX) costs. This work presents a model created to predict these costs over the anticipated assessment period. The developed model predicts capital expenditures, maintenance and service disruption costs and links them to the three major assets options involved in OLE underbridges.

KW - OLE

KW - cost

KW - rail maintenance

KW - whole life cycle

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/development-whole-life-cycle-cost-model-electrification-options-uk-rail-system

U2 - 10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.067

DO - 10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.067

M3 - Chapter

SN - 22128271 (ISSN)

T3 - Procedia CIRP

SP - 1

EP - 5

BT - Procedia CIRP

PB - Elsevier B.V.

ER -