Distributive justice before the eighteenth century: The right of necessity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Until recently, few people would have doubted that the idea of distributive justice is old, indeed ancient. Several authors have now challenged this assumption. Most prominently, Samuel Fleischacker argued that distributive justice originates in the eighteenth century. If accurate, this would upset much of what we have taken for granted about an important part of the history of Western political thought. However, the thesis is manifestly flawed; and since it has already proven influential, it is important to set the record straight. We will focus on the principle of extreme necessity, developed in twelfth- and thirteenth-century canon law, and subsequently adopted in civil law. Despite its immense importance for the history of political thought, the principle is barely known, and much less discussed. We briefly characterize the main tenets of the principle and show that it meets all the criteria to count as a principle of distributive justice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)449-464
Number of pages16
JournalHistory of Political Thought
Volume32
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

distributive justice
eighteenth century
twelfth century
civil law
thirteenth century
history
Law
Distributive Justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Distributive justice before the eighteenth century : The right of necessity. / van Duffel, Siegfried; Yap, Dennis.

In: History of Political Thought, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2011, p. 449-464.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5bd11787e1674cd38f8feb4e1225210d,
title = "Distributive justice before the eighteenth century: The right of necessity",
abstract = "Until recently, few people would have doubted that the idea of distributive justice is old, indeed ancient. Several authors have now challenged this assumption. Most prominently, Samuel Fleischacker argued that distributive justice originates in the eighteenth century. If accurate, this would upset much of what we have taken for granted about an important part of the history of Western political thought. However, the thesis is manifestly flawed; and since it has already proven influential, it is important to set the record straight. We will focus on the principle of extreme necessity, developed in twelfth- and thirteenth-century canon law, and subsequently adopted in civil law. Despite its immense importance for the history of political thought, the principle is barely known, and much less discussed. We briefly characterize the main tenets of the principle and show that it meets all the criteria to count as a principle of distributive justice.",
author = "{van Duffel}, Siegfried and Dennis Yap",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "449--464",
journal = "History of Political Thought",
issn = "0143-781X",
publisher = "Imprint Academic",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distributive justice before the eighteenth century

T2 - The right of necessity

AU - van Duffel, Siegfried

AU - Yap, Dennis

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Until recently, few people would have doubted that the idea of distributive justice is old, indeed ancient. Several authors have now challenged this assumption. Most prominently, Samuel Fleischacker argued that distributive justice originates in the eighteenth century. If accurate, this would upset much of what we have taken for granted about an important part of the history of Western political thought. However, the thesis is manifestly flawed; and since it has already proven influential, it is important to set the record straight. We will focus on the principle of extreme necessity, developed in twelfth- and thirteenth-century canon law, and subsequently adopted in civil law. Despite its immense importance for the history of political thought, the principle is barely known, and much less discussed. We briefly characterize the main tenets of the principle and show that it meets all the criteria to count as a principle of distributive justice.

AB - Until recently, few people would have doubted that the idea of distributive justice is old, indeed ancient. Several authors have now challenged this assumption. Most prominently, Samuel Fleischacker argued that distributive justice originates in the eighteenth century. If accurate, this would upset much of what we have taken for granted about an important part of the history of Western political thought. However, the thesis is manifestly flawed; and since it has already proven influential, it is important to set the record straight. We will focus on the principle of extreme necessity, developed in twelfth- and thirteenth-century canon law, and subsequently adopted in civil law. Despite its immense importance for the history of political thought, the principle is barely known, and much less discussed. We briefly characterize the main tenets of the principle and show that it meets all the criteria to count as a principle of distributive justice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054776098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054776098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80054776098

VL - 32

SP - 449

EP - 464

JO - History of Political Thought

JF - History of Political Thought

SN - 0143-781X

IS - 3

ER -