Education hubs and talent development

policymaking and implementation challenges

Jack T. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The discourse on the internationalization of higher education emphasizes revenue generation while neglecting other diverse rationales pursued by governments and institutions. For countries that are seeking to venture into a knowledge economy or accrue greater competitive advantages under globalization, many policymakers view cross-border higher education as a platform for developing human talent. In this pursuit, education hubs stand out as large-scale initiatives supported by extensive planning and investment. By comparing the developments of Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong as education hubs, three distinct objectives are apparent: to develop local talent, to attract foreign talent, and to repatriate diasporic talent. Despite the attention directed at the recruitment of international students, developing local talent remains a fundamental goal among education hubs. Talent development includes manpower planning as well as more inclusive provisions that support the diverse interests among local students. On the other hand, education hubs do not share the goals of attracting foreign and repatriating diasporic talent. Contextual factors such as distinct political economies and ethnic sensitivities mediate the recruitment of external talent. Comparing the policy rhetoric of talent development against the realities of implementation reveals sharp misalignment in some cases. More importantly, the political inertia in Singapore and Hong Kong exerts a gravitational pull that is increasingly turning sentiments against some foreign talent.

Original languageEnglish
JournalHigher Education
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

education
Singapore
Hong Kong
Talent Development
Education
Policy Making
planning
knowledge economy
manpower
internationalization
Malaysia
political economy
revenue
rhetoric
student
globalization
discourse
Planning

Keywords

  • Asia
  • Cross border education
  • Education hubs
  • Human capital
  • Internationalization
  • Talent development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Education hubs and talent development : policymaking and implementation challenges. / Lee, Jack T.

In: Higher Education, 12.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dee923389cd14f16b19d2fc0414827a8,
title = "Education hubs and talent development: policymaking and implementation challenges",
abstract = "The discourse on the internationalization of higher education emphasizes revenue generation while neglecting other diverse rationales pursued by governments and institutions. For countries that are seeking to venture into a knowledge economy or accrue greater competitive advantages under globalization, many policymakers view cross-border higher education as a platform for developing human talent. In this pursuit, education hubs stand out as large-scale initiatives supported by extensive planning and investment. By comparing the developments of Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong as education hubs, three distinct objectives are apparent: to develop local talent, to attract foreign talent, and to repatriate diasporic talent. Despite the attention directed at the recruitment of international students, developing local talent remains a fundamental goal among education hubs. Talent development includes manpower planning as well as more inclusive provisions that support the diverse interests among local students. On the other hand, education hubs do not share the goals of attracting foreign and repatriating diasporic talent. Contextual factors such as distinct political economies and ethnic sensitivities mediate the recruitment of external talent. Comparing the policy rhetoric of talent development against the realities of implementation reveals sharp misalignment in some cases. More importantly, the political inertia in Singapore and Hong Kong exerts a gravitational pull that is increasingly turning sentiments against some foreign talent.",
keywords = "Asia, Cross border education, Education hubs, Human capital, Internationalization, Talent development",
author = "Lee, {Jack T.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s10734-014-9745-x",
language = "English",
journal = "Higher Education",
issn = "0018-1560",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Education hubs and talent development

T2 - policymaking and implementation challenges

AU - Lee, Jack T.

PY - 2014/12

Y1 - 2014/12

N2 - The discourse on the internationalization of higher education emphasizes revenue generation while neglecting other diverse rationales pursued by governments and institutions. For countries that are seeking to venture into a knowledge economy or accrue greater competitive advantages under globalization, many policymakers view cross-border higher education as a platform for developing human talent. In this pursuit, education hubs stand out as large-scale initiatives supported by extensive planning and investment. By comparing the developments of Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong as education hubs, three distinct objectives are apparent: to develop local talent, to attract foreign talent, and to repatriate diasporic talent. Despite the attention directed at the recruitment of international students, developing local talent remains a fundamental goal among education hubs. Talent development includes manpower planning as well as more inclusive provisions that support the diverse interests among local students. On the other hand, education hubs do not share the goals of attracting foreign and repatriating diasporic talent. Contextual factors such as distinct political economies and ethnic sensitivities mediate the recruitment of external talent. Comparing the policy rhetoric of talent development against the realities of implementation reveals sharp misalignment in some cases. More importantly, the political inertia in Singapore and Hong Kong exerts a gravitational pull that is increasingly turning sentiments against some foreign talent.

AB - The discourse on the internationalization of higher education emphasizes revenue generation while neglecting other diverse rationales pursued by governments and institutions. For countries that are seeking to venture into a knowledge economy or accrue greater competitive advantages under globalization, many policymakers view cross-border higher education as a platform for developing human talent. In this pursuit, education hubs stand out as large-scale initiatives supported by extensive planning and investment. By comparing the developments of Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong as education hubs, three distinct objectives are apparent: to develop local talent, to attract foreign talent, and to repatriate diasporic talent. Despite the attention directed at the recruitment of international students, developing local talent remains a fundamental goal among education hubs. Talent development includes manpower planning as well as more inclusive provisions that support the diverse interests among local students. On the other hand, education hubs do not share the goals of attracting foreign and repatriating diasporic talent. Contextual factors such as distinct political economies and ethnic sensitivities mediate the recruitment of external talent. Comparing the policy rhetoric of talent development against the realities of implementation reveals sharp misalignment in some cases. More importantly, the political inertia in Singapore and Hong Kong exerts a gravitational pull that is increasingly turning sentiments against some foreign talent.

KW - Asia

KW - Cross border education

KW - Education hubs

KW - Human capital

KW - Internationalization

KW - Talent development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896416434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896416434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10734-014-9745-x

DO - 10.1007/s10734-014-9745-x

M3 - Article

JO - Higher Education

JF - Higher Education

SN - 0018-1560

ER -