Abstract
Educators and administrators in secondary and higher education in Kazakhstan have experienced significant reforms since 2010. New policies, curricula, pedagogy, assessment practices, accountability mechanisms, and legislation were implemented in an education revolution, to modernize Kazakh education and build human capital for economic prosperity. The development and use of educational research is a component of these reforms but little is known about practitioners’ understanding of and engagement with educational research. This qualitative study employed individual in-depth interviews with ten educational practitioners in secondary and higher education to address the knowledge gap. The findings suggest that practitioner understandings of research remain underdeveloped. While some practitioners both consume and produce research to improve practice and institutional decision-making, issues of access to research, the challenge of time within workload and perceptions of the limited relevance of externally produced research continue to be barriers to more extensive utilization of research. Further research is being undertaken to explore this issue with policymakers and researchers. The findings may be used to improve the mobilization of research to policy and practice, especially in other post-soviet contexts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 213-227 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Asia Pacific Education Review |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2024 |
Funding
This study was financed by Nazarbayev University Faculty Research Grant No. 021220FD3251 for which the authors are grateful. Her comments identify a range of barriers to the utilization of research by practitioners. Research conducted by practitioners during postgraduate studies was written for dissemination as theses or in academic journals in discourses that were not readily accessible to practitioners. Practitioners in HE institutions were under institutional pressure to publish in high-quality academic journals, often in English. Similarly, research funded by the Ministry of Education and Science required a lengthy, bureaucratic peer review process. Medina explained that journals have to be approved and recommended by a Ministerial committee: “For a journal to enter this committee, it needs to go through a lot of stages. Now the process is going and blind peer review has been launched for the first time.”
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Ministry of Education and Science | |
| Nazarbayev University | 021220FD3251 |
Keywords
- Educational research
- Kazakhstan
- Post-Soviet
- Research impact
- Research mobilization
- Research-practice nexus
- Researchers
- Teacher-researchers
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Educational practitioners’ conceptualizations of the nature, impact and challenges of educational research in Kazakhstan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS