Equity Book Values Greater Than Market Values: Accounting, Risk, or Mispricing>

Mary E. Barth, Doron Israeli, Suhas A. Sridharan

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

Despite accounting conservatism, equity book values greater than market values (BTM > 1) are not rare. The question we address is why. We find BTM > 1 is not only not rare, but also pervasive and persistent. More importantly, BTM > 1 is not attributable to potentially overstated equity book values, which calls into question BTM as a measure of conservative accounting for nearly 30% of firms. Rather, BTM > 1 is attributable to low equity market values, which partially stem from macroeconomic risk and other risk that is different for firms with BTM > 1. These findings call into question the use of Fama and French’s HML factor to reflect risk for firms with BTM > 1. Mispricing associated with investor myopia in over-extrapolating weakening in a firm’s otherwise strong fundamental performance contributes to the low equity market values. Taken together, our findings reveal the BTM threshold of one has meaningful implications for accounting and finance.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages55
Publication statusIn preparation - 2019

Fingerprint

Book value
Market value
Equity
Mispricing
Equity markets
Factors
Investors
Conservative accounting
Finance
Macroeconomics
Myopia
Accounting conservatism

Keywords

  • Book-to-market ratios
  • Conservatism
  • Macroeconomic risk
  • Extrapolation

Cite this

Equity Book Values Greater Than Market Values: Accounting, Risk, or Mispricing> / Barth, Mary E. ; Israeli, Doron; Sridharan, Suhas A.

2019.

Research output: Working paper

@techreport{09a581cf53d54defaa0048f0e23db27e,
title = "Equity Book Values Greater Than Market Values: Accounting, Risk, or Mispricing>",
abstract = "Despite accounting conservatism, equity book values greater than market values (BTM > 1) are not rare. The question we address is why. We find BTM > 1 is not only not rare, but also pervasive and persistent. More importantly, BTM > 1 is not attributable to potentially overstated equity book values, which calls into question BTM as a measure of conservative accounting for nearly 30{\%} of firms. Rather, BTM > 1 is attributable to low equity market values, which partially stem from macroeconomic risk and other risk that is different for firms with BTM > 1. These findings call into question the use of Fama and French’s HML factor to reflect risk for firms with BTM > 1. Mispricing associated with investor myopia in over-extrapolating weakening in a firm’s otherwise strong fundamental performance contributes to the low equity market values. Taken together, our findings reveal the BTM threshold of one has meaningful implications for accounting and finance.",
keywords = "Book-to-market ratios, Conservatism, Macroeconomic risk, Extrapolation",
author = "Barth, {Mary E.} and Doron Israeli and Sridharan, {Suhas A.}",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - Equity Book Values Greater Than Market Values: Accounting, Risk, or Mispricing>

AU - Barth, Mary E.

AU - Israeli, Doron

AU - Sridharan, Suhas A.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Despite accounting conservatism, equity book values greater than market values (BTM > 1) are not rare. The question we address is why. We find BTM > 1 is not only not rare, but also pervasive and persistent. More importantly, BTM > 1 is not attributable to potentially overstated equity book values, which calls into question BTM as a measure of conservative accounting for nearly 30% of firms. Rather, BTM > 1 is attributable to low equity market values, which partially stem from macroeconomic risk and other risk that is different for firms with BTM > 1. These findings call into question the use of Fama and French’s HML factor to reflect risk for firms with BTM > 1. Mispricing associated with investor myopia in over-extrapolating weakening in a firm’s otherwise strong fundamental performance contributes to the low equity market values. Taken together, our findings reveal the BTM threshold of one has meaningful implications for accounting and finance.

AB - Despite accounting conservatism, equity book values greater than market values (BTM > 1) are not rare. The question we address is why. We find BTM > 1 is not only not rare, but also pervasive and persistent. More importantly, BTM > 1 is not attributable to potentially overstated equity book values, which calls into question BTM as a measure of conservative accounting for nearly 30% of firms. Rather, BTM > 1 is attributable to low equity market values, which partially stem from macroeconomic risk and other risk that is different for firms with BTM > 1. These findings call into question the use of Fama and French’s HML factor to reflect risk for firms with BTM > 1. Mispricing associated with investor myopia in over-extrapolating weakening in a firm’s otherwise strong fundamental performance contributes to the low equity market values. Taken together, our findings reveal the BTM threshold of one has meaningful implications for accounting and finance.

KW - Book-to-market ratios

KW - Conservatism

KW - Macroeconomic risk

KW - Extrapolation

M3 - Working paper

BT - Equity Book Values Greater Than Market Values: Accounting, Risk, or Mispricing>

ER -