ERP benefits capability framework

orchestration theory perspective

Amgad Badewi, Essam Shehab, Jing Zeng, Mostafa Mohamad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to answer two research questions: what are the ERP resources and organizational complementary resources (OCRs) required to achieve each group of benefits? And on the basis of its resources, when should an organization invest more in ERP resources and/or OCRs so that the potential value of its ERP is realised? Design/methodology/approach: Studying 12 organizations in different countries and validating the results with 8 consultants. Findings: ERP benefits realization capability framework is developed; it shows that each group of benefits requires ERP resources (classified into features, attached technologies and information technology department competences) and OCRs (classified into practices, attitudes, culture, skills and organizational characteristics) and that leaping ahead to gain innovation benefits before being mature enough in realising a firm’s planning and automation capabilities could be a waste of time and effort. Research limitations/implications: It is qualitative study. It needs to be backed by quantitative studies to test the results. Practical implications: Although the “P” in ERP stands for planning, many academics and practitioners still believe that ERP applies to automation only. This research spotlights that the ability to invest in ERP can increase the innovation and planning capabilities of the organization only if it is extended and grown at the right time and if it is supported by OCRs. It is not cost effective to push an organization to achieve all the benefits at the same time; rather, it is clear that an organization would not be able to enjoy a higher level of benefits until it achieves a significant number of lower-level benefits. Thus, investing in higher-level benefit assets directly after an ERP implementation, when there are no organizational capabilities available to use these assets, could be inefficient. Moreover, it could be stressful to users when they see plenty of new ERP resources without the ability to use them. Although it could be of slight benefit to introduce, for example, business intelligence to employees in the “stabilizing period” (Badewi et al., 2013), from the financial perspective, it is a waste of money since the benefits would not be realised as expected. Therefore, orchestrating ERP assets with the development of organizational capabilities is important for achieving the greatest effectiveness and efficiency of the resources available to the organization. This research can be used as a benchmark for designing the various blueprints required to achieve different groups of benefits from ERP investments. Originality/value: This research addresses two novel questions: RQ1: what are the ERP resources and OCRs required to achieve the different kinds of ERP benefits? RQ2: when, and on what basis, should an organization deploy more resources to leverage the ERP business value?

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)266-294
Number of pages29
JournalBusiness Process Management Journal
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Orchestration
Resources
Complementary resources
Assets
Planning
Organizational capabilities
Automation
Innovation
Organizational characteristics
Employees
Benchmark
Qualitative study
Investing
Design methodology
Consultants
ERP implementation
Business value
Business intelligence
Leverage

Keywords

  • Asset orchestration
  • Benefits management
  • Capability theories
  • Critical realism
  • ERP
  • ERP business value

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Cite this

ERP benefits capability framework : orchestration theory perspective. / Badewi, Amgad; Shehab, Essam; Zeng, Jing; Mohamad, Mostafa.

In: Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 266-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Badewi, Amgad ; Shehab, Essam ; Zeng, Jing ; Mohamad, Mostafa. / ERP benefits capability framework : orchestration theory perspective. In: Business Process Management Journal. 2018 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 266-294.
@article{9ba6ee6a3baf47289c31bb00a0843fb6,
title = "ERP benefits capability framework: orchestration theory perspective",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to answer two research questions: what are the ERP resources and organizational complementary resources (OCRs) required to achieve each group of benefits? And on the basis of its resources, when should an organization invest more in ERP resources and/or OCRs so that the potential value of its ERP is realised? Design/methodology/approach: Studying 12 organizations in different countries and validating the results with 8 consultants. Findings: ERP benefits realization capability framework is developed; it shows that each group of benefits requires ERP resources (classified into features, attached technologies and information technology department competences) and OCRs (classified into practices, attitudes, culture, skills and organizational characteristics) and that leaping ahead to gain innovation benefits before being mature enough in realising a firm’s planning and automation capabilities could be a waste of time and effort. Research limitations/implications: It is qualitative study. It needs to be backed by quantitative studies to test the results. Practical implications: Although the “P” in ERP stands for planning, many academics and practitioners still believe that ERP applies to automation only. This research spotlights that the ability to invest in ERP can increase the innovation and planning capabilities of the organization only if it is extended and grown at the right time and if it is supported by OCRs. It is not cost effective to push an organization to achieve all the benefits at the same time; rather, it is clear that an organization would not be able to enjoy a higher level of benefits until it achieves a significant number of lower-level benefits. Thus, investing in higher-level benefit assets directly after an ERP implementation, when there are no organizational capabilities available to use these assets, could be inefficient. Moreover, it could be stressful to users when they see plenty of new ERP resources without the ability to use them. Although it could be of slight benefit to introduce, for example, business intelligence to employees in the “stabilizing period” (Badewi et al., 2013), from the financial perspective, it is a waste of money since the benefits would not be realised as expected. Therefore, orchestrating ERP assets with the development of organizational capabilities is important for achieving the greatest effectiveness and efficiency of the resources available to the organization. This research can be used as a benchmark for designing the various blueprints required to achieve different groups of benefits from ERP investments. Originality/value: This research addresses two novel questions: RQ1: what are the ERP resources and OCRs required to achieve the different kinds of ERP benefits? RQ2: when, and on what basis, should an organization deploy more resources to leverage the ERP business value?",
keywords = "Asset orchestration, Benefits management, Capability theories, Critical realism, ERP, ERP business value",
author = "Amgad Badewi and Essam Shehab and Jing Zeng and Mostafa Mohamad",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/BPMJ-11-2015-0162",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "266--294",
journal = "Business Process Management Journal",
issn = "1463-7154",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ERP benefits capability framework

T2 - orchestration theory perspective

AU - Badewi, Amgad

AU - Shehab, Essam

AU - Zeng, Jing

AU - Mohamad, Mostafa

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to answer two research questions: what are the ERP resources and organizational complementary resources (OCRs) required to achieve each group of benefits? And on the basis of its resources, when should an organization invest more in ERP resources and/or OCRs so that the potential value of its ERP is realised? Design/methodology/approach: Studying 12 organizations in different countries and validating the results with 8 consultants. Findings: ERP benefits realization capability framework is developed; it shows that each group of benefits requires ERP resources (classified into features, attached technologies and information technology department competences) and OCRs (classified into practices, attitudes, culture, skills and organizational characteristics) and that leaping ahead to gain innovation benefits before being mature enough in realising a firm’s planning and automation capabilities could be a waste of time and effort. Research limitations/implications: It is qualitative study. It needs to be backed by quantitative studies to test the results. Practical implications: Although the “P” in ERP stands for planning, many academics and practitioners still believe that ERP applies to automation only. This research spotlights that the ability to invest in ERP can increase the innovation and planning capabilities of the organization only if it is extended and grown at the right time and if it is supported by OCRs. It is not cost effective to push an organization to achieve all the benefits at the same time; rather, it is clear that an organization would not be able to enjoy a higher level of benefits until it achieves a significant number of lower-level benefits. Thus, investing in higher-level benefit assets directly after an ERP implementation, when there are no organizational capabilities available to use these assets, could be inefficient. Moreover, it could be stressful to users when they see plenty of new ERP resources without the ability to use them. Although it could be of slight benefit to introduce, for example, business intelligence to employees in the “stabilizing period” (Badewi et al., 2013), from the financial perspective, it is a waste of money since the benefits would not be realised as expected. Therefore, orchestrating ERP assets with the development of organizational capabilities is important for achieving the greatest effectiveness and efficiency of the resources available to the organization. This research can be used as a benchmark for designing the various blueprints required to achieve different groups of benefits from ERP investments. Originality/value: This research addresses two novel questions: RQ1: what are the ERP resources and OCRs required to achieve the different kinds of ERP benefits? RQ2: when, and on what basis, should an organization deploy more resources to leverage the ERP business value?

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to answer two research questions: what are the ERP resources and organizational complementary resources (OCRs) required to achieve each group of benefits? And on the basis of its resources, when should an organization invest more in ERP resources and/or OCRs so that the potential value of its ERP is realised? Design/methodology/approach: Studying 12 organizations in different countries and validating the results with 8 consultants. Findings: ERP benefits realization capability framework is developed; it shows that each group of benefits requires ERP resources (classified into features, attached technologies and information technology department competences) and OCRs (classified into practices, attitudes, culture, skills and organizational characteristics) and that leaping ahead to gain innovation benefits before being mature enough in realising a firm’s planning and automation capabilities could be a waste of time and effort. Research limitations/implications: It is qualitative study. It needs to be backed by quantitative studies to test the results. Practical implications: Although the “P” in ERP stands for planning, many academics and practitioners still believe that ERP applies to automation only. This research spotlights that the ability to invest in ERP can increase the innovation and planning capabilities of the organization only if it is extended and grown at the right time and if it is supported by OCRs. It is not cost effective to push an organization to achieve all the benefits at the same time; rather, it is clear that an organization would not be able to enjoy a higher level of benefits until it achieves a significant number of lower-level benefits. Thus, investing in higher-level benefit assets directly after an ERP implementation, when there are no organizational capabilities available to use these assets, could be inefficient. Moreover, it could be stressful to users when they see plenty of new ERP resources without the ability to use them. Although it could be of slight benefit to introduce, for example, business intelligence to employees in the “stabilizing period” (Badewi et al., 2013), from the financial perspective, it is a waste of money since the benefits would not be realised as expected. Therefore, orchestrating ERP assets with the development of organizational capabilities is important for achieving the greatest effectiveness and efficiency of the resources available to the organization. This research can be used as a benchmark for designing the various blueprints required to achieve different groups of benefits from ERP investments. Originality/value: This research addresses two novel questions: RQ1: what are the ERP resources and OCRs required to achieve the different kinds of ERP benefits? RQ2: when, and on what basis, should an organization deploy more resources to leverage the ERP business value?

KW - Asset orchestration

KW - Benefits management

KW - Capability theories

KW - Critical realism

KW - ERP

KW - ERP business value

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041855812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041855812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/BPMJ-11-2015-0162

DO - 10.1108/BPMJ-11-2015-0162

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 266

EP - 294

JO - Business Process Management Journal

JF - Business Process Management Journal

SN - 1463-7154

IS - 1

ER -