TY - CHAP
T1 - ETHICAL AND LINGUA-ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PAREMIOLOGICAL UNITS OF THE KAZAKH AND RUSSIAN LANGUAGES
AU - Omarbekova, Gulnara
N1 - Aktuganova, S. (2015). The main directions of modern lingua-ecological research. A new word in science: development prospects: materials of the IV Intern. scientific-practical. conf. (Cheboksary, May 29, 2015). Cheboksary: CNS “Interactive Plus”. – URL:https://interactive-plus.ru/e-publications/e-publication-136.pdf (date: 15.10.2021).Andreeva, K. (2012). “A Christmas Carol” by C. Dickens from the Perspective of Ethical Lingua-ecology. Tyumen State University Bulletin, Ser.: Philology, (1). P. 11-15.Andreeva, K. Literary text in the paradigm of ethical lingua-ecology [Electronic Resource].– URL: http://www.tgspa.ru/info/science/action (Date: 23.12.2021). Andreeva, K. (2012). Ethical lingua-ecology of a moral person. Tyumen: Vector Book.Andreeva, K., Klevtsova, O., Dzida, N. (2017). Moral ecology. Lambert Academic Publishing.Arutyunova, N. (1999). Language and the human world.Moscow, School “Languages of Russian Culture”.Avtaeva, N. (2020). Multimedia media technologies. Textbook of the Department of Journalism of N.Lobachevsky NNSU. Nizhny Novgorod: Publishing house of NNSU.Baitursynov, А.(1926) Ädebïet tanıtqış [Guide to literature]. Tashkent. (in Kazakh)Belopasova, M. (2009). The concept of “Good” in ethical lingua-ecology. Cognitive research. Issue. XXVI. Representation of concepts in language and cognitive methods of their research. Tambov.Danialova, M. (2011). Personal value system. Ideas and ideals. Philosophy, ethics, religious studies. Vol.2. Iss.3(9), 88-93
Dmitrieva, N. (2005). Ethical Aspect of the Culture of Russian Speech (Linguistic and Cultural Analysis of the Dictionary of Agricultural Students). Chelyabinsk.Formanovskaya, N. (2007). Speech interaction. Communication and pragmatics. Moscow. Icar.Horkmaier, M., Adorno, Th. (1996). Problems of moral philosophy. Мoscow.Ilinova, E. (2012). Ecolinguistic mode of eventfulness in the space of mass media discourse. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. P. 2(12). P. 168-175.Isakova, N. (1989). Culture of the peoples of the North. Philosophical sociological analysis. Novosibirsk. Nauka, Siberian Branch.Likhachev, D. (1997). Concept sphere of the Russian language. Russian literature. Anthology, ed. V.P. Neroznaka. M.: Academia.Karadzhev, B. (2009). Communicative and pragmatic potential of Russian proverbs. Abstract diss. philol. Sciences. Moscow.Karasik, V. (2015). Language spiral: values, signs, motives. Volgograd. Paradigm. Kononova, T., Makhortova, N.(2011). Formation of personal value orientations as a way and condition for preserving the ecology of the information space. Ecology of language at the crossroads of sciences. International scientific conference materials.Tyumen: Publishing House TSU.Kozin, V. (2009). Environmental approach in landscape ecology. Bulletin of Tyumen State University. Iss. P. 53-58.Krashennikova, E. (2017). The concept of “Calmness” in B.Zaitsev’s work in the aspect of ethical lingua-ecology. Bulletin of the South Ural State Humanitarian and Pedagogical University. – URl: file:///C:/Users/W2/Downloads/kontsept-spokoystvie-v-tvorchestve-b-k-zaytseva-v-aspekte-eticheskoy-lingvoekologii.pdf (date: 15.10.2021).Markaryan, E. (1983). Theory of culture and modern science: Logic-methodological analysis. Moscow. Mysyl.Mokrushina, E. (2008). The concept of“Kind” as an ethical phenomenon of lingua-culture: based on the material of the English language. Moscow.Molchanova, G. (2006). Synergy as the main type-forming parameter of modern linguistic and intercultural innovations. Bulletin of Moscow State University: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. Iss. 19(4). P. 9-20.Omarbekova, G. (2022). Perspectives on Proverb Use among Kazakhs: Ecological Discourse. In: Contemporary Kazakh Proverb Research: Digital, Cognitive, Literary, and Ecological Approaches // Peter Lang International Academic Publishers. New York. 250 p. – URL: https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85145427563&origin=resultslist&txGid=b78813ef1b75d3d9ad565aa99c54e39c DOI: 10.3726/ b19538Pakhomova, M. (2012). Information reloading as a factor influencing the manifestation of the Yerkes-Dodson law in consumer behavior. Psychological Sciences: Theory and Practice: Materials of international scientific conf. Moscow. P. 84-86.Pashaeva, I. (2011). Ethical assessment in the paradigm of anthropological linguistics. Bulletin of Irkutsk Technical University. Iss. 7 (54). P. 250-257.Polikanova, E. (2014). Moral values and their role in modern society. Philosophy and Society. Iss. (3). P. 131-140.Saifullina, E. (2008). Gossip, quarrel, flattery, etc. as negatively evaluated speech genres (on the example of proverbs about speech behavior). Bulletin of the Bashkir University. 13(4). P. 986-989.Searl, J. (1986). Indirect speech acts. New in foreign linguistics. Issue. XXII. Theory of speech acts. Мoscow.Shakhovsky, V. (2020). Ecology of language and man in a changing society. Neophilology. P. 6(22). P. 217-225.Shakhovsky, V. (2018). Accelerated communication is a need of modern society. Linguistic existence of a person and an ethnos. Materials of the 15th Berezinsky Readings. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences RAS. Vol. 20. P. 128-293. – file:///C:/Users/W2/Downloads/uskorennaya-kommunikatsiya-kak-potrebnost-sovremennogo-sotsiuma.pdf (date: 15.10.2021).Sidorkova, G. (1999). Pragmatics of Paremias: Proverbs and Sayings as Speech Actions. Krasnodar.Steffonsen, S., Fill, А. (2014). Ecolinguistics: the State of the Art and the Future Horizons.Ecolinguistics: The Ecology of Language and Science: special issue of Language Sciences, (Part 41).Tarasova, O., Skitina, N. (2018). Proverbs with a zoonymic component in the light of the lingua-ecological approach. Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice. Tambov: Gramota. Iss. 10 (88). Vol.1. P. 162-169.Volchansky, M. (2004). General characteristics of experimental and non-experimental methods in psychology. Volgograd. – http://window.edu.ru/resource/223/63223/files/psy008. (date: 15.10.2021).
PY - 2023/12/29
Y1 - 2023/12/29
N2 - The article is devoted to the study of paremiological units of the Kazakh and Russian languages in the aspect of ethical lingua-ecology. The study is due to the growing interest of scientists in the ethical potential of proverbs, as well as insufficient consideration of proverbs in the speech-pragmatic aspect. Since these short words reflect people's conclusions and judgments, they make it possible to determine the nature of the ethical assessment (positive or negative) inherent in the speech. This article examines the proverbs of the Kazakh and Russian languages from the perspective of their ecological friendliness and non-ecological friendliness. It studies value models of behavior and stereotypical ideas that can harm the emotional balance of the listener. The article identifies the meanings of Kazakh and Russian paremias through various tasks and determines their ecological friendliness or non-ecological friendliness by analyzing the nature of their impact, whether positive or negative. This aspect of the study of proverbs is innovative, as previous works on linguistics only considered ethical concepts. To determine the nature of the impact of proverbs on the consciousness of communicants, the study used one hundred and five proverbs of the Kazakh and Russian languages, and the communicants had to determine the meaning of the proverbs and the nature of their impact. To clarify the hidden meaning of the paremiological unit through lingua-pragmatic analysis, the types of people's intentions manifested in the value system were determined. The study concludes that the development of ethical lingua-ecology should be aimed at studying ethical factors (proverbs) expressing ethical norms, as well as phenomena that harm human safety in the textual information environment.
AB - The article is devoted to the study of paremiological units of the Kazakh and Russian languages in the aspect of ethical lingua-ecology. The study is due to the growing interest of scientists in the ethical potential of proverbs, as well as insufficient consideration of proverbs in the speech-pragmatic aspect. Since these short words reflect people's conclusions and judgments, they make it possible to determine the nature of the ethical assessment (positive or negative) inherent in the speech. This article examines the proverbs of the Kazakh and Russian languages from the perspective of their ecological friendliness and non-ecological friendliness. It studies value models of behavior and stereotypical ideas that can harm the emotional balance of the listener. The article identifies the meanings of Kazakh and Russian paremias through various tasks and determines their ecological friendliness or non-ecological friendliness by analyzing the nature of their impact, whether positive or negative. This aspect of the study of proverbs is innovative, as previous works on linguistics only considered ethical concepts. To determine the nature of the impact of proverbs on the consciousness of communicants, the study used one hundred and five proverbs of the Kazakh and Russian languages, and the communicants had to determine the meaning of the proverbs and the nature of their impact. To clarify the hidden meaning of the paremiological unit through lingua-pragmatic analysis, the types of people's intentions manifested in the value system were determined. The study concludes that the development of ethical lingua-ecology should be aimed at studying ethical factors (proverbs) expressing ethical norms, as well as phenomena that harm human safety in the textual information environment.
KW - ethical lingua-ecology, norms, proverbs, speech act, modeling experiment, threat, manipulation.
U2 - 10.26577/EJPh.2023.v192.i4.ph8
DO - 10.26577/EJPh.2023.v192.i4.ph8
M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)
SN - 1563-0323
VL - Том 192 № 4 (2023)
SP - 82
EP - 95
BT - Вестник КазНУ. Серия филологическая
PB - Вестник КазНУ. Серия филологическая
CY - Almaty
ER -