European cultural diplomacy: diaspora relations with Kazakhstan

Neil Collins, Kristina Bekenova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cultural diplomacy using diasporic communities as facilitators of interaction between states has long been important. This article suggests a typology of networks of communication derived from a case study of long-established diasporas living in post-independence Kazakhstan and their relationship with their European ‘homelands’. The typology juxtaposes the official stance of homeland governments expressed in formal and legal provisions with the lived experience of the diaspora communities. The study highlights the benefits of developing vibrant ‘valued’ networks of communication embracing both local diasporas and homeland embassies and agencies. In such cases, diplomatic benefits accrue to the homeland and local communities are empowered. Similarly, failing to capitalise on positive sentiment with some infrastructural support may leave an ‘expressive’ network as one of neglected potential.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)732-750
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Cultural Policy
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2 2017

Fingerprint

Kazakhstan
diplomacy
Homelands
diaspora
typology
community
legal provision
communication
interaction
experience

Keywords

  • cultural diplomacy
  • Diaspora
  • European Union member states
  • Kazakhstan
  • network of communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

European cultural diplomacy : diaspora relations with Kazakhstan. / Collins, Neil; Bekenova, Kristina.

In: International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol. 23, No. 6, 02.11.2017, p. 732-750.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{13699d7579764205a9b1dc1edfe8e2dc,
title = "European cultural diplomacy: diaspora relations with Kazakhstan",
abstract = "Cultural diplomacy using diasporic communities as facilitators of interaction between states has long been important. This article suggests a typology of networks of communication derived from a case study of long-established diasporas living in post-independence Kazakhstan and their relationship with their European ‘homelands’. The typology juxtaposes the official stance of homeland governments expressed in formal and legal provisions with the lived experience of the diaspora communities. The study highlights the benefits of developing vibrant ‘valued’ networks of communication embracing both local diasporas and homeland embassies and agencies. In such cases, diplomatic benefits accrue to the homeland and local communities are empowered. Similarly, failing to capitalise on positive sentiment with some infrastructural support may leave an ‘expressive’ network as one of neglected potential.",
keywords = "cultural diplomacy, Diaspora, European Union member states, Kazakhstan, network of communication",
author = "Neil Collins and Kristina Bekenova",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10286632.2017.1343309",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "732--750",
journal = "International Journal of Cultural Policy",
issn = "1028-6632",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - European cultural diplomacy

T2 - diaspora relations with Kazakhstan

AU - Collins, Neil

AU - Bekenova, Kristina

PY - 2017/11/2

Y1 - 2017/11/2

N2 - Cultural diplomacy using diasporic communities as facilitators of interaction between states has long been important. This article suggests a typology of networks of communication derived from a case study of long-established diasporas living in post-independence Kazakhstan and their relationship with their European ‘homelands’. The typology juxtaposes the official stance of homeland governments expressed in formal and legal provisions with the lived experience of the diaspora communities. The study highlights the benefits of developing vibrant ‘valued’ networks of communication embracing both local diasporas and homeland embassies and agencies. In such cases, diplomatic benefits accrue to the homeland and local communities are empowered. Similarly, failing to capitalise on positive sentiment with some infrastructural support may leave an ‘expressive’ network as one of neglected potential.

AB - Cultural diplomacy using diasporic communities as facilitators of interaction between states has long been important. This article suggests a typology of networks of communication derived from a case study of long-established diasporas living in post-independence Kazakhstan and their relationship with their European ‘homelands’. The typology juxtaposes the official stance of homeland governments expressed in formal and legal provisions with the lived experience of the diaspora communities. The study highlights the benefits of developing vibrant ‘valued’ networks of communication embracing both local diasporas and homeland embassies and agencies. In such cases, diplomatic benefits accrue to the homeland and local communities are empowered. Similarly, failing to capitalise on positive sentiment with some infrastructural support may leave an ‘expressive’ network as one of neglected potential.

KW - cultural diplomacy

KW - Diaspora

KW - European Union member states

KW - Kazakhstan

KW - network of communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025138307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025138307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10286632.2017.1343309

DO - 10.1080/10286632.2017.1343309

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85025138307

VL - 23

SP - 732

EP - 750

JO - International Journal of Cultural Policy

JF - International Journal of Cultural Policy

SN - 1028-6632

IS - 6

ER -