TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating machine learning models for supernova gravitational wave signal classification
AU - Abylkairov, Y. Sultan
AU - Edwards, Matthew C.
AU - Orel, Daniil
AU - Mitra, Ayan
AU - Shukirgaliyev, Bekdaulet
AU - Abdikamalov, Ernazar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
PY - 2024/12/1
Y1 - 2024/12/1
N2 - We investigate the potential of using gravitational wave (GW) signals from rotating core-collapse supernovae to probe the equation of state (EOS) of nuclear matter. By generating GW signals from simulations with various EOSs, we train machine learning models to classify them and evaluate their performance. Our study builds on previous work by examining how different machine learning models, parameters, and data preprocessing techniques impact classification accuracy. We test convolutional and recurrent neural networks, as well as six classical algorithms: random forest, support vector machines, naïve Bayes(NB), logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors, and eXtreme gradient boosting. All models, except NB, achieve over 90 per cent accuracy on our dataset. Additionally, we assess the impact of approximating the GW signal using the general relativistic effective potential (GREP) on EOS classification. We find that models trained on GREP data exhibit low classification accuracy. However, normalizing time by the peak signal frequency, which partially compensates for the absence of the time dilation effect in GREP, leads to a notable improvement in accuracy. Despite this, the accuracy does not exceed 70 per cent, suggesting that GREP lacks the precision necessary for EOS classification. Finally, our study has several limitations, including the omission of detector noise and the focus on a single progenitor mass model, which will be addressed in future works.
AB - We investigate the potential of using gravitational wave (GW) signals from rotating core-collapse supernovae to probe the equation of state (EOS) of nuclear matter. By generating GW signals from simulations with various EOSs, we train machine learning models to classify them and evaluate their performance. Our study builds on previous work by examining how different machine learning models, parameters, and data preprocessing techniques impact classification accuracy. We test convolutional and recurrent neural networks, as well as six classical algorithms: random forest, support vector machines, naïve Bayes(NB), logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors, and eXtreme gradient boosting. All models, except NB, achieve over 90 per cent accuracy on our dataset. Additionally, we assess the impact of approximating the GW signal using the general relativistic effective potential (GREP) on EOS classification. We find that models trained on GREP data exhibit low classification accuracy. However, normalizing time by the peak signal frequency, which partially compensates for the absence of the time dilation effect in GREP, leads to a notable improvement in accuracy. Despite this, the accuracy does not exceed 70 per cent, suggesting that GREP lacks the precision necessary for EOS classification. Finally, our study has several limitations, including the omission of detector noise and the focus on a single progenitor mass model, which will be addressed in future works.
KW - data analysis
KW - deep learning
KW - gravitational waves
KW - machine learning
KW - supernovae
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85214311300&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85214311300&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/2632-2153/ada33a
DO - 10.1088/2632-2153/ada33a
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85214311300
SN - 2632-2153
VL - 5
JO - Machine Learning: Science and Technology
JF - Machine Learning: Science and Technology
IS - 4
M1 - 045077
ER -