TY - JOUR
T1 - Fee-charging private tutoring and educational inequality
T2 - voices of secondary school students in Türkiye
AU - Aypay, Ahmet
AU - Hajar, Anas
AU - Atmaca, Taner
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This quantitative study, grounded in Entrich’s (2018) model of educational inequality, examines the nature and implications of fee-charging private tutoring among 623 Grade 12 students in Türkiye. The findings reveal that 76% of participants engaged in tutoring, primarily to prepare for university entrance examinations in subjects such as mathematics and physics. Regression analyses indicate that tutoring frequency and perceived effectiveness were associated with students’ views on tutor competence, exam-related motivations, and the role of families in arranging tutoring. While tutoring proved academically beneficial for some, it also placed financial pressure on nearly half of the participants’ families and disproportionately favoured students from more educated and economically advantaged households. These patterns suggest that private tutoring reinforces existing educational inequalities. The study contributes to the limited literature on students’ perspectives within Türkiye’s shadow education sector and offers valuable insights for education policymakers. Practical implications include the need for targeted regulation, financial support mechanisms for disadvantaged students, and improvements in public school quality to reduce reliance on private tutoring. Without coordinated reforms, the growth of fee-based tutoring may continue to undermine national and international goals for inclusive and equitable education.
AB - This quantitative study, grounded in Entrich’s (2018) model of educational inequality, examines the nature and implications of fee-charging private tutoring among 623 Grade 12 students in Türkiye. The findings reveal that 76% of participants engaged in tutoring, primarily to prepare for university entrance examinations in subjects such as mathematics and physics. Regression analyses indicate that tutoring frequency and perceived effectiveness were associated with students’ views on tutor competence, exam-related motivations, and the role of families in arranging tutoring. While tutoring proved academically beneficial for some, it also placed financial pressure on nearly half of the participants’ families and disproportionately favoured students from more educated and economically advantaged households. These patterns suggest that private tutoring reinforces existing educational inequalities. The study contributes to the limited literature on students’ perspectives within Türkiye’s shadow education sector and offers valuable insights for education policymakers. Practical implications include the need for targeted regulation, financial support mechanisms for disadvantaged students, and improvements in public school quality to reduce reliance on private tutoring. Without coordinated reforms, the growth of fee-based tutoring may continue to undermine national and international goals for inclusive and equitable education.
KW - access to higher education
KW - educational inequality
KW - fee-charging private tutoring
KW - quantitative study
KW - Shadow education
KW - Türkiye
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105004437107&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105004437107&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14767724.2025.2498001
DO - 10.1080/14767724.2025.2498001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105004437107
SN - 1476-7724
JO - Globalisation, Societies and Education
JF - Globalisation, Societies and Education
ER -