Framework for Engineering Design Systems Architectures Evaluation and Selection

Case Study

Mohamed Darwish, Essam Shehab

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

Engineering companies face the challenge of developing complex Engineering Design Systems. These systems involve huge financial, people, and time investments within an environment that is characterised by continuously changing technologies and processes. Systems architecture provides the strategies and modelling approaches to ensure that adequate resources are spent in developing the possible To Be states for a target system. Architecture selection and evaluation involves evaluating different architectural alternatives with respect to multiple criteria, hence an Architecture Evaluation Framework which evaluates and down selects the appropriate architectures solutions is crucial to assess how these systems will deliver value over their lifetime, and where to channel the financial and human investments to maximize benefit delivered to the business' bottom line. In this paper, an evaluation and selection architecture framework is proposed, which targets to maximise the alignment of Engineering Design Systems with business goals based on a quality centric architecture evaluation approach. The framework utilised software Quality Attributes as well as SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat) and PEST (Political, Economic, Social, Technological) analyses to capture different viewpoints related to technical, political and business context. The framework proposed employing AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) to quantitatively elicit relationships between Quality Attributes trade-offs and architectural characteristics. The framework was applied to a real case study considering five Engineering Design Systems alternative architectures, where workshops with subject matter experts and stakeholders were held to reach an informative decision, that maximise architectural quality, whilst maintaining business alignment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)128-132
Number of pages5
JournalProcedia CIRP
Volume60
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2017
Externally publishedYes
Event27th CIRP Design Conference 2017 - Cranfield, United Kingdom
Duration: May 10 2017May 12 2017

Fingerprint

Industry
Economics

Keywords

  • analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
  • architecture evaluation
  • Engineering design system architecutre
  • quality attributes
  • SWOT and PEST

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Framework for Engineering Design Systems Architectures Evaluation and Selection : Case Study. / Darwish, Mohamed; Shehab, Essam.

In: Procedia CIRP, Vol. 60, 01.01.2017, p. 128-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

@article{91c32f6bfc8b498384e2903e614b858c,
title = "Framework for Engineering Design Systems Architectures Evaluation and Selection: Case Study",
abstract = "Engineering companies face the challenge of developing complex Engineering Design Systems. These systems involve huge financial, people, and time investments within an environment that is characterised by continuously changing technologies and processes. Systems architecture provides the strategies and modelling approaches to ensure that adequate resources are spent in developing the possible To Be states for a target system. Architecture selection and evaluation involves evaluating different architectural alternatives with respect to multiple criteria, hence an Architecture Evaluation Framework which evaluates and down selects the appropriate architectures solutions is crucial to assess how these systems will deliver value over their lifetime, and where to channel the financial and human investments to maximize benefit delivered to the business' bottom line. In this paper, an evaluation and selection architecture framework is proposed, which targets to maximise the alignment of Engineering Design Systems with business goals based on a quality centric architecture evaluation approach. The framework utilised software Quality Attributes as well as SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat) and PEST (Political, Economic, Social, Technological) analyses to capture different viewpoints related to technical, political and business context. The framework proposed employing AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) to quantitatively elicit relationships between Quality Attributes trade-offs and architectural characteristics. The framework was applied to a real case study considering five Engineering Design Systems alternative architectures, where workshops with subject matter experts and stakeholders were held to reach an informative decision, that maximise architectural quality, whilst maintaining business alignment.",
keywords = "analytic hierarchy process (AHP), architecture evaluation, Engineering design system architecutre, quality attributes, SWOT and PEST",
author = "Mohamed Darwish and Essam Shehab",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.058",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "128--132",
journal = "Procedia CIRP",
issn = "2212-8271",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Framework for Engineering Design Systems Architectures Evaluation and Selection

T2 - Case Study

AU - Darwish, Mohamed

AU - Shehab, Essam

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Engineering companies face the challenge of developing complex Engineering Design Systems. These systems involve huge financial, people, and time investments within an environment that is characterised by continuously changing technologies and processes. Systems architecture provides the strategies and modelling approaches to ensure that adequate resources are spent in developing the possible To Be states for a target system. Architecture selection and evaluation involves evaluating different architectural alternatives with respect to multiple criteria, hence an Architecture Evaluation Framework which evaluates and down selects the appropriate architectures solutions is crucial to assess how these systems will deliver value over their lifetime, and where to channel the financial and human investments to maximize benefit delivered to the business' bottom line. In this paper, an evaluation and selection architecture framework is proposed, which targets to maximise the alignment of Engineering Design Systems with business goals based on a quality centric architecture evaluation approach. The framework utilised software Quality Attributes as well as SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat) and PEST (Political, Economic, Social, Technological) analyses to capture different viewpoints related to technical, political and business context. The framework proposed employing AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) to quantitatively elicit relationships between Quality Attributes trade-offs and architectural characteristics. The framework was applied to a real case study considering five Engineering Design Systems alternative architectures, where workshops with subject matter experts and stakeholders were held to reach an informative decision, that maximise architectural quality, whilst maintaining business alignment.

AB - Engineering companies face the challenge of developing complex Engineering Design Systems. These systems involve huge financial, people, and time investments within an environment that is characterised by continuously changing technologies and processes. Systems architecture provides the strategies and modelling approaches to ensure that adequate resources are spent in developing the possible To Be states for a target system. Architecture selection and evaluation involves evaluating different architectural alternatives with respect to multiple criteria, hence an Architecture Evaluation Framework which evaluates and down selects the appropriate architectures solutions is crucial to assess how these systems will deliver value over their lifetime, and where to channel the financial and human investments to maximize benefit delivered to the business' bottom line. In this paper, an evaluation and selection architecture framework is proposed, which targets to maximise the alignment of Engineering Design Systems with business goals based on a quality centric architecture evaluation approach. The framework utilised software Quality Attributes as well as SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat) and PEST (Political, Economic, Social, Technological) analyses to capture different viewpoints related to technical, political and business context. The framework proposed employing AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) to quantitatively elicit relationships between Quality Attributes trade-offs and architectural characteristics. The framework was applied to a real case study considering five Engineering Design Systems alternative architectures, where workshops with subject matter experts and stakeholders were held to reach an informative decision, that maximise architectural quality, whilst maintaining business alignment.

KW - analytic hierarchy process (AHP)

KW - architecture evaluation

KW - Engineering design system architecutre

KW - quality attributes

KW - SWOT and PEST

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020016259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020016259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.058

DO - 10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.058

M3 - Conference article

VL - 60

SP - 128

EP - 132

JO - Procedia CIRP

JF - Procedia CIRP

SN - 2212-8271

ER -