Full-scale coupled torsion and lateral response of mast arm drilled shaft foundations

Sudheesh Thiyyakkandi, Michael McVay, Peter Lai, Rodrigo Herrera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drilled shaft foundations supporting mast arm assemblies are subjected to significant torsion and lateral load during severe wind loading (e.g., hurricane). Past centrifuge studies in granular soils suggest that the design of such foundations should be performed for a coupled load case, since the lateral resistance is considerably reduced by the concurrent application of torsion. However, current design practice still considers lateral load and torsion independently due to the lack of field verification of centrifuge results. This paper reports on a full-scale test program to investigate the coupled load behavior of drilled shafts. A novel load test setup (with a heavy-duty mast arm assembly) and instrumentation were used for the combined torsion and lateral loading (e.g., wind loading). The study revealed a significant reduction in lateral resistance due to the influence of torque as observed from previous centrifuge studies. Torsional resistance was reduced (approximately 20%) by the impact of lateral load when compared with the anticipated torsional resistance based on unit skin friction values, derived from the axial load test results (i.e., no influence of lateral load). A comparison of measured torsional resistance during the combined loading with the predicted values using different approaches was also made. O’Neill and Hassan’s beta (β) method (sand) and alpha method (clay) are found to predict the torsional resistance reasonably well (±10%), while all other methods based on the standard penetration test and cone penetration test considered in the study overpredicted or underpredicted the resistance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1928-1938
Number of pages11
JournalCanadian Geotechnical Journal
Volume53
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

torsion
Torsional stress
shaft
Centrifuges
centrifuge
Loads (forces)
cone penetration test
penetration test
Skin friction
Hurricanes
Axial loads
torque
hurricane
instrumentation
Cones
skin
Clay
Sand
friction
Torque

Keywords

  • Coupled loading
  • Drilled shaft
  • Full-scale load test
  • Lateral load
  • Torsion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

Full-scale coupled torsion and lateral response of mast arm drilled shaft foundations. / Thiyyakkandi, Sudheesh; McVay, Michael; Lai, Peter; Herrera, Rodrigo.

In: Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 53, No. 12, 2016, p. 1928-1938.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thiyyakkandi, Sudheesh ; McVay, Michael ; Lai, Peter ; Herrera, Rodrigo. / Full-scale coupled torsion and lateral response of mast arm drilled shaft foundations. In: Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 53, No. 12. pp. 1928-1938.
@article{f054f72ed94e4a9e9a7a76c278766e73,
title = "Full-scale coupled torsion and lateral response of mast arm drilled shaft foundations",
abstract = "Drilled shaft foundations supporting mast arm assemblies are subjected to significant torsion and lateral load during severe wind loading (e.g., hurricane). Past centrifuge studies in granular soils suggest that the design of such foundations should be performed for a coupled load case, since the lateral resistance is considerably reduced by the concurrent application of torsion. However, current design practice still considers lateral load and torsion independently due to the lack of field verification of centrifuge results. This paper reports on a full-scale test program to investigate the coupled load behavior of drilled shafts. A novel load test setup (with a heavy-duty mast arm assembly) and instrumentation were used for the combined torsion and lateral loading (e.g., wind loading). The study revealed a significant reduction in lateral resistance due to the influence of torque as observed from previous centrifuge studies. Torsional resistance was reduced (approximately 20{\%}) by the impact of lateral load when compared with the anticipated torsional resistance based on unit skin friction values, derived from the axial load test results (i.e., no influence of lateral load). A comparison of measured torsional resistance during the combined loading with the predicted values using different approaches was also made. O’Neill and Hassan’s beta (β) method (sand) and alpha method (clay) are found to predict the torsional resistance reasonably well (±10{\%}), while all other methods based on the standard penetration test and cone penetration test considered in the study overpredicted or underpredicted the resistance.",
keywords = "Coupled loading, Drilled shaft, Full-scale load test, Lateral load, Torsion",
author = "Sudheesh Thiyyakkandi and Michael McVay and Peter Lai and Rodrigo Herrera",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1139/cgj-2016-0241",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "1928--1938",
journal = "Canadian Geotechnical Journal",
issn = "0008-3674",
publisher = "National Research Council of Canada",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Full-scale coupled torsion and lateral response of mast arm drilled shaft foundations

AU - Thiyyakkandi, Sudheesh

AU - McVay, Michael

AU - Lai, Peter

AU - Herrera, Rodrigo

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Drilled shaft foundations supporting mast arm assemblies are subjected to significant torsion and lateral load during severe wind loading (e.g., hurricane). Past centrifuge studies in granular soils suggest that the design of such foundations should be performed for a coupled load case, since the lateral resistance is considerably reduced by the concurrent application of torsion. However, current design practice still considers lateral load and torsion independently due to the lack of field verification of centrifuge results. This paper reports on a full-scale test program to investigate the coupled load behavior of drilled shafts. A novel load test setup (with a heavy-duty mast arm assembly) and instrumentation were used for the combined torsion and lateral loading (e.g., wind loading). The study revealed a significant reduction in lateral resistance due to the influence of torque as observed from previous centrifuge studies. Torsional resistance was reduced (approximately 20%) by the impact of lateral load when compared with the anticipated torsional resistance based on unit skin friction values, derived from the axial load test results (i.e., no influence of lateral load). A comparison of measured torsional resistance during the combined loading with the predicted values using different approaches was also made. O’Neill and Hassan’s beta (β) method (sand) and alpha method (clay) are found to predict the torsional resistance reasonably well (±10%), while all other methods based on the standard penetration test and cone penetration test considered in the study overpredicted or underpredicted the resistance.

AB - Drilled shaft foundations supporting mast arm assemblies are subjected to significant torsion and lateral load during severe wind loading (e.g., hurricane). Past centrifuge studies in granular soils suggest that the design of such foundations should be performed for a coupled load case, since the lateral resistance is considerably reduced by the concurrent application of torsion. However, current design practice still considers lateral load and torsion independently due to the lack of field verification of centrifuge results. This paper reports on a full-scale test program to investigate the coupled load behavior of drilled shafts. A novel load test setup (with a heavy-duty mast arm assembly) and instrumentation were used for the combined torsion and lateral loading (e.g., wind loading). The study revealed a significant reduction in lateral resistance due to the influence of torque as observed from previous centrifuge studies. Torsional resistance was reduced (approximately 20%) by the impact of lateral load when compared with the anticipated torsional resistance based on unit skin friction values, derived from the axial load test results (i.e., no influence of lateral load). A comparison of measured torsional resistance during the combined loading with the predicted values using different approaches was also made. O’Neill and Hassan’s beta (β) method (sand) and alpha method (clay) are found to predict the torsional resistance reasonably well (±10%), while all other methods based on the standard penetration test and cone penetration test considered in the study overpredicted or underpredicted the resistance.

KW - Coupled loading

KW - Drilled shaft

KW - Full-scale load test

KW - Lateral load

KW - Torsion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85000788291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85000788291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1139/cgj-2016-0241

DO - 10.1139/cgj-2016-0241

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 1928

EP - 1938

JO - Canadian Geotechnical Journal

JF - Canadian Geotechnical Journal

SN - 0008-3674

IS - 12

ER -