Geostatistical Algorithm Selection for Mineral Resources Assessment and its Impact on Open-pit Production Planning Considering Metal Grade Boundary Effect

Mohammad Maleki, Nasser Madani, Enrique Jélvez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mine planning is influenced by many sources of uncertainty. Significant sources of geological uncertainty in mine planning include uncertainty in layout of geological domains and uncertainty in metal grades. These two sources of uncertainty cannot be modeled separately because the distribution of the grade is controlled usually by geological domains. Two approaches exist for combining these two sources of uncertainty: the joint simulation approach and the cascade approach. In this paper, these two approaches were compared using a real case study. To this end, uncertainty in iron grade (quantitative variable) and ore zones (qualitative variable) was modeled using both approaches. There were some considerable differences in the results obtained by each approach, which confirm the importance of choosing the most appropriate approach with consideration of the dominate features of a deposit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4079-4094
Number of pages16
JournalNatural Resources Research
Volume30
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021

Keywords

  • Cascade approach
  • Geostatistical simulation
  • Joint simulation
  • Mine planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Environmental Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Geostatistical Algorithm Selection for Mineral Resources Assessment and its Impact on Open-pit Production Planning Considering Metal Grade Boundary Effect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this