Impact of Greenfield FDI versus M&A on growth and domestic investment in developing Asia

Sasidaran Gopalan, Alice Ouyang, Ramkishen S. Rajan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A large literature establishes the growth-enhancing benefits of foreign direct investment (FDI) flows into emerging market economies in general. Conventional wisdom holds that FDI is a preferable form of external financing compared to other types of capital flows because of its stabilizing properties. While this might hold true largely for FDI flows of the Greenfield variety, in reality, a greater share of FDI to emerging economies in general and Asian economies appears to be in the form of mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Do all types of FDI flows produce similar macroeconomic benefits? This paper empirically explores whether the type of FDI flow, i.e. Greenfield versus M&A, matters in the way it impacts economic growth and domestic investment for a large panel of developing Asian economies over 1990–2013. We find Greenfield FDI contributes positively to economic growth while FDI in the form of M&A appears to have no significant growth influence. We also find that the effects of Greenfield FDI on domestic capital formation are stronger and larger relative to M&A flows.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-70
Number of pages30
JournalEconomia Politica
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

direct investment
foreign investment
Economy in general
economic growth
outside financing
Greenfield
Asia
Foreign direct investment
Domestic investment
capital formation
economy
capital movement
merger
market economy
macroeconomics
wisdom
acquisition

Keywords

  • Asia
  • Foreign direct investment (FDI)
  • Greenfield
  • Growth
  • Investments
  • Mergers and acquisitions (M&A)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Impact of Greenfield FDI versus M&A on growth and domestic investment in developing Asia. / Gopalan, Sasidaran; Ouyang, Alice; Rajan, Ramkishen S.

In: Economia Politica, Vol. 35, No. 1, 01.04.2018, p. 41-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gopalan, Sasidaran ; Ouyang, Alice ; Rajan, Ramkishen S. / Impact of Greenfield FDI versus M&A on growth and domestic investment in developing Asia. In: Economia Politica. 2018 ; Vol. 35, No. 1. pp. 41-70.
@article{1fbc2b3b6c644e74926ee233598d9dcd,
title = "Impact of Greenfield FDI versus M&A on growth and domestic investment in developing Asia",
abstract = "A large literature establishes the growth-enhancing benefits of foreign direct investment (FDI) flows into emerging market economies in general. Conventional wisdom holds that FDI is a preferable form of external financing compared to other types of capital flows because of its stabilizing properties. While this might hold true largely for FDI flows of the Greenfield variety, in reality, a greater share of FDI to emerging economies in general and Asian economies appears to be in the form of mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Do all types of FDI flows produce similar macroeconomic benefits? This paper empirically explores whether the type of FDI flow, i.e. Greenfield versus M&A, matters in the way it impacts economic growth and domestic investment for a large panel of developing Asian economies over 1990–2013. We find Greenfield FDI contributes positively to economic growth while FDI in the form of M&A appears to have no significant growth influence. We also find that the effects of Greenfield FDI on domestic capital formation are stronger and larger relative to M&A flows.",
keywords = "Asia, Foreign direct investment (FDI), Greenfield, Growth, Investments, Mergers and acquisitions (M&A)",
author = "Sasidaran Gopalan and Alice Ouyang and Rajan, {Ramkishen S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40888-017-0085-z",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "41--70",
journal = "Economia Politica",
issn = "1120-2890",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of Greenfield FDI versus M&A on growth and domestic investment in developing Asia

AU - Gopalan, Sasidaran

AU - Ouyang, Alice

AU - Rajan, Ramkishen S.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - A large literature establishes the growth-enhancing benefits of foreign direct investment (FDI) flows into emerging market economies in general. Conventional wisdom holds that FDI is a preferable form of external financing compared to other types of capital flows because of its stabilizing properties. While this might hold true largely for FDI flows of the Greenfield variety, in reality, a greater share of FDI to emerging economies in general and Asian economies appears to be in the form of mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Do all types of FDI flows produce similar macroeconomic benefits? This paper empirically explores whether the type of FDI flow, i.e. Greenfield versus M&A, matters in the way it impacts economic growth and domestic investment for a large panel of developing Asian economies over 1990–2013. We find Greenfield FDI contributes positively to economic growth while FDI in the form of M&A appears to have no significant growth influence. We also find that the effects of Greenfield FDI on domestic capital formation are stronger and larger relative to M&A flows.

AB - A large literature establishes the growth-enhancing benefits of foreign direct investment (FDI) flows into emerging market economies in general. Conventional wisdom holds that FDI is a preferable form of external financing compared to other types of capital flows because of its stabilizing properties. While this might hold true largely for FDI flows of the Greenfield variety, in reality, a greater share of FDI to emerging economies in general and Asian economies appears to be in the form of mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Do all types of FDI flows produce similar macroeconomic benefits? This paper empirically explores whether the type of FDI flow, i.e. Greenfield versus M&A, matters in the way it impacts economic growth and domestic investment for a large panel of developing Asian economies over 1990–2013. We find Greenfield FDI contributes positively to economic growth while FDI in the form of M&A appears to have no significant growth influence. We also find that the effects of Greenfield FDI on domestic capital formation are stronger and larger relative to M&A flows.

KW - Asia

KW - Foreign direct investment (FDI)

KW - Greenfield

KW - Growth

KW - Investments

KW - Mergers and acquisitions (M&A)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044594311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044594311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40888-017-0085-z

DO - 10.1007/s40888-017-0085-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044594311

VL - 35

SP - 41

EP - 70

JO - Economia Politica

JF - Economia Politica

SN - 1120-2890

IS - 1

ER -