TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementation of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at the University level
AU - Omarbekova, Gulnara
N1 - Akzhigitova, A. Sh. & Zharkynbekova. K. (2013). Social aspects of the functioning of the Russian language in the framework of the language policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan: (for example, city Astana). Sociological research, 9, 96-99.
An introduction to CLIL Notes based on a CLIL course at British Study Center. (2012) Oxford.
DOI: http://www.itis.biella.it/europa/pdf-europa/CLIL_Report.pdf.
Banegas, D. L. (2012). CLIL teacher development: Challenges and experiences. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 5(1), 46-56.
Banegas, D. (2014). Integrating content and language in English language teaching in secondary education: Models, benefits and challenges. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 111-136.
Beisenova Zh.S. (2013). Language Shifts in Case of Language Policy of Kazakhstan. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy, 2(8), 653-659.
Bertaux,P., Coonan,C.V., Frigols-Martín, M.J., Mehisto, P. (2010). The CLIL teacher’s competences grid. DOI: http://tplusm.net/CLIL_Competences_Grid_31.12.09.pdf.
Cammarata, L. & Tedick, D. J. (2012). Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 251-269
Coonan, M. (2007). Insider views of the CLIL class through teacher self-observation-introspection. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 625-646.
Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543- 562.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Henn–Reinke, Kathryn. (2012). Considering Trilingual Education. New York: Routledge
Jasone Cenoz, Fred Genesee, & Durk Gorter. (2014). Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward. Applied Linguistics, 35 (3), 243–262.
Kazakhstan joined the Bologna Process. DOI: https://iqaa.kz/en/news/item/1333-kazakhstan-joined-the-bologna-process.
Kachru, B. (1992). A Biographical Sketch".World Englishes, 11 (2–3). 91–94.
Kakenov, R. (2017). Teachers’ experiences of using CLIL in Kazakh language classrooms. NUGSE Research in Education, 2(2), 21-29.
Karimsakova, A.S., Yermenova, K.K., Kuzembayeva, G.A. (2018). CLIL implementation in West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov state medical university: challenges and experience. The West Kazakhstan medicine journal, 57 (1), 63-67.
Khairullina G.D. (2016). Content and language integration in CLIL classes. Journal of achievements of science and education, 65-70.
Lucietto, S. A. (2008). Model for Quality CLIL Provision. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(1), 83–92.
Marsh, D. (Ed.). (2002). CLIL/EMILE: The European dimension. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
Marsh, D., Mehisto, P., Wolff, D. Frigols-Martin, M. (2010). The European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages (ECML).
Marsh, D. (2012). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): A Development trajectory. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Córdoba, Spain.
Massler, U., Stotz, D., & Queisser, C. (2014) Assessment instruments for primary CLIL: the conceptualisation and evaluation of test tasks. The Language Learning Journal, 42 (2), 137-150.
Mehisto, P., Kambatyrova, A., & Nurseitova, A. (2014). Three in one? Trilingualism in educational policy and practice. In D. Bridges (Ed.), Educational reform and internationalization: The case of school reform in Kazakhstan (pp. 152-176). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nazarbayev, N. (2007). Address of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan to the People of Kazakhstan. DOI: http://www.akorda.kz/en/addresses/addresses_of_president/address-of-the-president-of-the-republic-of-kazakhstan-nursultan-nazarbayev-to-the-people-of-kazakhstan-february-28-2007
Olcott, M. B. (1985). The politics of language reforms in Kazakhstan, in Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Soviet National Languages: Their Past, Present and Future, ed. I. Kreindler, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 183 – 204.
Ruiz de Zarobe. (2013). CLIL implementation: From policy-makers to individual initiatives. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 231-243.
Seitzhanova, A., Plokhikh, R., Baiburiev R., Tsaregorodtseva A. (2015). English as the medium of instruction: Modern tendency of education in Kazakhstan. PRADEC Conference Proceedings, 3(1), 74-77.
Sidorenko, T.V. & Rybushkina, S.V. (2017). Integrated subject-language training and its prospects in Russian technical Universities. The Education and Science Journal. 19(6), 182-193.
Smagulova, J. (2006). Kazakhstan. Language, identity and conflict. Journal Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 19 (3, 4), 303-320.
Suleimenova, E.D. (2001) Bulletin of Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (series: philological), Almaty, 16, 19–30.
The CLIL Guidebook. DOI: https://www.languages.dk/archive/clil4u/book/CLIL%20Book%20En.pdf
The Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2010) State Program of Education Development in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2011-2020. DOI: https://kaznmu.kz/eng/state-program-of-education-development-in-the-republic-of-kazakhstan/
UNDP. Kazakhstan: Human Development Report. (1995). DOI: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/general-human-development-report-kazakhstan-1995
PY - 2020/5/30
Y1 - 2020/5/30
N2 - Recently Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) has become well established in the educational system of Kazakhstan. CLIL means teaching a subject, in our case economics and business, through the second language, the Kazakh language at Nazarbayev University. The paper examines the effectiveness of this approach, and provides guidelines for the successful implementation of CLIL. One of the main advantages of this approach is content-driven; the dual focus of teaching both the subject and the language together will increase students’ motivation to learn the target language. Learning the language becomes more focused, as the language is used to solve specific communicative tasks. Thus, the ability to communicate in the Kazakh language in a professional context becomes, after all, a priority. This article explores the language of economics and business based on the subject and language materials in the Kazakh language. The author provides suggestions for designing economics- and business-related tasks that both support and develop this language in the classroom. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of the CLIL approach as it relates to the education of language teachers, their professional challenges, and the development of curriculum materials for students who study economics and business language in Kazakh.
AB - Recently Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) has become well established in the educational system of Kazakhstan. CLIL means teaching a subject, in our case economics and business, through the second language, the Kazakh language at Nazarbayev University. The paper examines the effectiveness of this approach, and provides guidelines for the successful implementation of CLIL. One of the main advantages of this approach is content-driven; the dual focus of teaching both the subject and the language together will increase students’ motivation to learn the target language. Learning the language becomes more focused, as the language is used to solve specific communicative tasks. Thus, the ability to communicate in the Kazakh language in a professional context becomes, after all, a priority. This article explores the language of economics and business based on the subject and language materials in the Kazakh language. The author provides suggestions for designing economics- and business-related tasks that both support and develop this language in the classroom. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of the CLIL approach as it relates to the education of language teachers, their professional challenges, and the development of curriculum materials for students who study economics and business language in Kazakh.
KW - Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL); content-driven approach; the Kazakh language
U2 - http://doi.org/10.53057/linfo/2020.2.1.2
DO - http://doi.org/10.53057/linfo/2020.2.1.2
M3 - Article
SN - 2707-5273
VL - 2
SP - 10
EP - 18
JO - Linguistic Forum
JF - Linguistic Forum
IS - 1, 2020
ER -