Improving qualifications-based selection by use of the fuzzy Delphi method

Odysseus George Manoliadis, John Paris Pantouvakis, Symeon Christodoulou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Among prevailing contract-awarding paradigms, the qualifications-based selection (QBS) method offers awarding agencies a substantial level of flexibility and multifactored decision-making capability over traditional cost-based paradigms (such as competitive bidding). QBS is a process used by owners to select proposers to whom they can award a project contract, based on the proposers' professional qualifications in relation to the specific project parameters. Further to being very suitable for the selection of professional engineering design services, QBS can also be applied for the selection of contractors involved in specialized construction or design-build projects. In such cases, the procurement method and the selection criteria used are critical decisions involving several key project team members and decision factors, the formulation of which requires complex evaluation methodologies. Within this context, a process is proposed by which the traditional QBS method can be improved via the utilization of a fuzzy Delphi method (FDM), a cross-mutation of the traditional Delphi method (DM) and fuzzy logic (FL). The method utilizes 'expert' appraisals to identify both the factors and their weights in the overall evaluation process through a 'fuzzy attractiveness ratio' (FAR) which is used for evaluating the bidders' suitability to task.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373-384
Number of pages12
JournalConstruction Management and Economics
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Contractors
Fuzzy logic
Decision making
Costs
Qualification
Delphi method
Paradigm
Factors
Design/build
Owners
Procurement
Project teams
Evaluation
Mutation
Engineering design
Competitive bidding
Evaluation methodologies
Selection criteria
Attractiveness

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Delphi method
  • Design-build
  • Fuzzy logic
  • Qualifications-based selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Management Information Systems
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Improving qualifications-based selection by use of the fuzzy Delphi method. / Manoliadis, Odysseus George; Pantouvakis, John Paris; Christodoulou, Symeon.

In: Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2009, p. 373-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Manoliadis, Odysseus George ; Pantouvakis, John Paris ; Christodoulou, Symeon. / Improving qualifications-based selection by use of the fuzzy Delphi method. In: Construction Management and Economics. 2009 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 373-384.
@article{266abfb01de547bca2393225c5ea5562,
title = "Improving qualifications-based selection by use of the fuzzy Delphi method",
abstract = "Among prevailing contract-awarding paradigms, the qualifications-based selection (QBS) method offers awarding agencies a substantial level of flexibility and multifactored decision-making capability over traditional cost-based paradigms (such as competitive bidding). QBS is a process used by owners to select proposers to whom they can award a project contract, based on the proposers' professional qualifications in relation to the specific project parameters. Further to being very suitable for the selection of professional engineering design services, QBS can also be applied for the selection of contractors involved in specialized construction or design-build projects. In such cases, the procurement method and the selection criteria used are critical decisions involving several key project team members and decision factors, the formulation of which requires complex evaluation methodologies. Within this context, a process is proposed by which the traditional QBS method can be improved via the utilization of a fuzzy Delphi method (FDM), a cross-mutation of the traditional Delphi method (DM) and fuzzy logic (FL). The method utilizes 'expert' appraisals to identify both the factors and their weights in the overall evaluation process through a 'fuzzy attractiveness ratio' (FAR) which is used for evaluating the bidders' suitability to task.",
keywords = "Decision making, Delphi method, Design-build, Fuzzy logic, Qualifications-based selection",
author = "Manoliadis, {Odysseus George} and Pantouvakis, {John Paris} and Symeon Christodoulou",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/01446190902758993",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "373--384",
journal = "Construction Management and Economics",
issn = "0144-6193",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving qualifications-based selection by use of the fuzzy Delphi method

AU - Manoliadis, Odysseus George

AU - Pantouvakis, John Paris

AU - Christodoulou, Symeon

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Among prevailing contract-awarding paradigms, the qualifications-based selection (QBS) method offers awarding agencies a substantial level of flexibility and multifactored decision-making capability over traditional cost-based paradigms (such as competitive bidding). QBS is a process used by owners to select proposers to whom they can award a project contract, based on the proposers' professional qualifications in relation to the specific project parameters. Further to being very suitable for the selection of professional engineering design services, QBS can also be applied for the selection of contractors involved in specialized construction or design-build projects. In such cases, the procurement method and the selection criteria used are critical decisions involving several key project team members and decision factors, the formulation of which requires complex evaluation methodologies. Within this context, a process is proposed by which the traditional QBS method can be improved via the utilization of a fuzzy Delphi method (FDM), a cross-mutation of the traditional Delphi method (DM) and fuzzy logic (FL). The method utilizes 'expert' appraisals to identify both the factors and their weights in the overall evaluation process through a 'fuzzy attractiveness ratio' (FAR) which is used for evaluating the bidders' suitability to task.

AB - Among prevailing contract-awarding paradigms, the qualifications-based selection (QBS) method offers awarding agencies a substantial level of flexibility and multifactored decision-making capability over traditional cost-based paradigms (such as competitive bidding). QBS is a process used by owners to select proposers to whom they can award a project contract, based on the proposers' professional qualifications in relation to the specific project parameters. Further to being very suitable for the selection of professional engineering design services, QBS can also be applied for the selection of contractors involved in specialized construction or design-build projects. In such cases, the procurement method and the selection criteria used are critical decisions involving several key project team members and decision factors, the formulation of which requires complex evaluation methodologies. Within this context, a process is proposed by which the traditional QBS method can be improved via the utilization of a fuzzy Delphi method (FDM), a cross-mutation of the traditional Delphi method (DM) and fuzzy logic (FL). The method utilizes 'expert' appraisals to identify both the factors and their weights in the overall evaluation process through a 'fuzzy attractiveness ratio' (FAR) which is used for evaluating the bidders' suitability to task.

KW - Decision making

KW - Delphi method

KW - Design-build

KW - Fuzzy logic

KW - Qualifications-based selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650312371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650312371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01446190902758993

DO - 10.1080/01446190902758993

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 373

EP - 384

JO - Construction Management and Economics

JF - Construction Management and Economics

SN - 0144-6193

IS - 4

ER -