Inclusion or exclusion ramifications of teenage pregnancy

A comparative analysis of Namibia and South African schools pregnancy policies

N. Mashishi, T. Makoelle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Pregnancy of learners for most South African schools has reached alarming proportions. To most governing bodies and teachers, it has becomes difficult to deal with pregnancy of learners. What makes this a conundrum is that teachers don't know what should be done for the well-being of the pregnant leaner, the baby and the fear that learners and teachers who may have to provide medical help should medical problems arise are not prepared. South African constitution forbids excluding pregnant learners from school and allows them (Pregnant learners) to continue with their schooling. The school governing bodies of most schools responded by formulating pregnancy policies which forbids a pregnant learner from continuing with her schooling when her pregnancy in the seventh to eight month and not to return to school immediately after the child is born. In some schools, a pregnant learner must be accompanied by an adult at all times for such a learner to continue with her schooling. Denying pregnant girls access to education is a denial of their fundamental human rights. This paper explores how schools through school governing bodies have modelled their pregnancy policy on the Department of Basic Education document entitled "Measures for the Prevention and Management of Learner Pregnancy". This paper also argues that the document referred above has some aspects which are unconstitutional like the exclusion from school by a pregnant learner for up to two years. Using a comparative analysis, the guidelines contained in the document referred above, are then compared with the ones from the neighbouring country of Namibia. The aim is to draw lessons from how Namibia deals with the prevalence of learner pregnancy in schools.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)374-379
Number of pages6
JournalMediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
Volume5
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Namibia
pregnancy
exclusion
inclusion
school
teacher
Pregnancy
Comparative analysis
Exclusion
Africa
Inclusion
Teenage pregnancy
Comparative Analysis
neighboring countries
basic education
baby
constitution
human rights
well-being
anxiety

Keywords

  • Inclusion policy
  • Inclusive education
  • Teenage pregnancy
  • Teenager

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

@article{a10f08c4d68f4a4aa73635ebd918fc00,
title = "Inclusion or exclusion ramifications of teenage pregnancy: A comparative analysis of Namibia and South African schools pregnancy policies",
abstract = "Pregnancy of learners for most South African schools has reached alarming proportions. To most governing bodies and teachers, it has becomes difficult to deal with pregnancy of learners. What makes this a conundrum is that teachers don't know what should be done for the well-being of the pregnant leaner, the baby and the fear that learners and teachers who may have to provide medical help should medical problems arise are not prepared. South African constitution forbids excluding pregnant learners from school and allows them (Pregnant learners) to continue with their schooling. The school governing bodies of most schools responded by formulating pregnancy policies which forbids a pregnant learner from continuing with her schooling when her pregnancy in the seventh to eight month and not to return to school immediately after the child is born. In some schools, a pregnant learner must be accompanied by an adult at all times for such a learner to continue with her schooling. Denying pregnant girls access to education is a denial of their fundamental human rights. This paper explores how schools through school governing bodies have modelled their pregnancy policy on the Department of Basic Education document entitled {"}Measures for the Prevention and Management of Learner Pregnancy{"}. This paper also argues that the document referred above has some aspects which are unconstitutional like the exclusion from school by a pregnant learner for up to two years. Using a comparative analysis, the guidelines contained in the document referred above, are then compared with the ones from the neighbouring country of Namibia. The aim is to draw lessons from how Namibia deals with the prevalence of learner pregnancy in schools.",
keywords = "Inclusion policy, Inclusive education, Teenage pregnancy, Teenager",
author = "N. Mashishi and T. Makoelle",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n14p374",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "374--379",
journal = "Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences",
issn = "2039-9340",
publisher = "MCSER-Mediterranean Center of Social and Educational research",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inclusion or exclusion ramifications of teenage pregnancy

T2 - A comparative analysis of Namibia and South African schools pregnancy policies

AU - Mashishi, N.

AU - Makoelle, T.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Pregnancy of learners for most South African schools has reached alarming proportions. To most governing bodies and teachers, it has becomes difficult to deal with pregnancy of learners. What makes this a conundrum is that teachers don't know what should be done for the well-being of the pregnant leaner, the baby and the fear that learners and teachers who may have to provide medical help should medical problems arise are not prepared. South African constitution forbids excluding pregnant learners from school and allows them (Pregnant learners) to continue with their schooling. The school governing bodies of most schools responded by formulating pregnancy policies which forbids a pregnant learner from continuing with her schooling when her pregnancy in the seventh to eight month and not to return to school immediately after the child is born. In some schools, a pregnant learner must be accompanied by an adult at all times for such a learner to continue with her schooling. Denying pregnant girls access to education is a denial of their fundamental human rights. This paper explores how schools through school governing bodies have modelled their pregnancy policy on the Department of Basic Education document entitled "Measures for the Prevention and Management of Learner Pregnancy". This paper also argues that the document referred above has some aspects which are unconstitutional like the exclusion from school by a pregnant learner for up to two years. Using a comparative analysis, the guidelines contained in the document referred above, are then compared with the ones from the neighbouring country of Namibia. The aim is to draw lessons from how Namibia deals with the prevalence of learner pregnancy in schools.

AB - Pregnancy of learners for most South African schools has reached alarming proportions. To most governing bodies and teachers, it has becomes difficult to deal with pregnancy of learners. What makes this a conundrum is that teachers don't know what should be done for the well-being of the pregnant leaner, the baby and the fear that learners and teachers who may have to provide medical help should medical problems arise are not prepared. South African constitution forbids excluding pregnant learners from school and allows them (Pregnant learners) to continue with their schooling. The school governing bodies of most schools responded by formulating pregnancy policies which forbids a pregnant learner from continuing with her schooling when her pregnancy in the seventh to eight month and not to return to school immediately after the child is born. In some schools, a pregnant learner must be accompanied by an adult at all times for such a learner to continue with her schooling. Denying pregnant girls access to education is a denial of their fundamental human rights. This paper explores how schools through school governing bodies have modelled their pregnancy policy on the Department of Basic Education document entitled "Measures for the Prevention and Management of Learner Pregnancy". This paper also argues that the document referred above has some aspects which are unconstitutional like the exclusion from school by a pregnant learner for up to two years. Using a comparative analysis, the guidelines contained in the document referred above, are then compared with the ones from the neighbouring country of Namibia. The aim is to draw lessons from how Namibia deals with the prevalence of learner pregnancy in schools.

KW - Inclusion policy

KW - Inclusive education

KW - Teenage pregnancy

KW - Teenager

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903994521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903994521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n14p374

DO - 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n14p374

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 374

EP - 379

JO - Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences

JF - Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences

SN - 2039-9340

IS - 14

ER -