Judging Russia

Constitutional court in Russian politics, 1990–2006

Research output: Book/ReportBook

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This book is the first in-depth study of the actual role that the Russian Constitutional Court played in protecting fundamental rights and resolving legislative-executive struggles and federalism disputes in both Yeltsin's and Putin's Russia. Trochev argues that judicial empowerment is a non-linear process with unintended consequences and that courts that depend on their reputation flourish only if an effective and capable state is there to support them. This is because judges can rely only on the authoritativeness of their judgments, unlike politicians and bureaucrats, who have the material resources necessary to respond to judicial decisions. Drawing upon systematic analysis of all decisions of the Russian Court (published and unpublished) and previously unavailable materials on their (non-)implementation, and resting on a combination of the approaches from comparative politics, law, and public administration, this book shows how and why judges attempted to reform Russia's governance and fought to ensure compliance with their judgments.

Original languageEnglish
PublisherCambridge University Press
Number of pages371
ISBN (Print)9780511511226, 9780521887434
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

constitutional court
Russia
politics
fundamental right
federalism
public administration
reputation
politician
empowerment
governance
reform
Law
resources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Judging Russia : Constitutional court in Russian politics, 1990–2006. / Trochev, Alexei.

Cambridge University Press, 2008. 371 p.

Research output: Book/ReportBook

@book{5bda0185901f41429ba649695e0f0b45,
title = "Judging Russia: Constitutional court in Russian politics, 1990–2006",
abstract = "This book is the first in-depth study of the actual role that the Russian Constitutional Court played in protecting fundamental rights and resolving legislative-executive struggles and federalism disputes in both Yeltsin's and Putin's Russia. Trochev argues that judicial empowerment is a non-linear process with unintended consequences and that courts that depend on their reputation flourish only if an effective and capable state is there to support them. This is because judges can rely only on the authoritativeness of their judgments, unlike politicians and bureaucrats, who have the material resources necessary to respond to judicial decisions. Drawing upon systematic analysis of all decisions of the Russian Court (published and unpublished) and previously unavailable materials on their (non-)implementation, and resting on a combination of the approaches from comparative politics, law, and public administration, this book shows how and why judges attempted to reform Russia's governance and fought to ensure compliance with their judgments.",
author = "Alexei Trochev",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511511226",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780511511226",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Judging Russia

T2 - Constitutional court in Russian politics, 1990–2006

AU - Trochev, Alexei

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - This book is the first in-depth study of the actual role that the Russian Constitutional Court played in protecting fundamental rights and resolving legislative-executive struggles and federalism disputes in both Yeltsin's and Putin's Russia. Trochev argues that judicial empowerment is a non-linear process with unintended consequences and that courts that depend on their reputation flourish only if an effective and capable state is there to support them. This is because judges can rely only on the authoritativeness of their judgments, unlike politicians and bureaucrats, who have the material resources necessary to respond to judicial decisions. Drawing upon systematic analysis of all decisions of the Russian Court (published and unpublished) and previously unavailable materials on their (non-)implementation, and resting on a combination of the approaches from comparative politics, law, and public administration, this book shows how and why judges attempted to reform Russia's governance and fought to ensure compliance with their judgments.

AB - This book is the first in-depth study of the actual role that the Russian Constitutional Court played in protecting fundamental rights and resolving legislative-executive struggles and federalism disputes in both Yeltsin's and Putin's Russia. Trochev argues that judicial empowerment is a non-linear process with unintended consequences and that courts that depend on their reputation flourish only if an effective and capable state is there to support them. This is because judges can rely only on the authoritativeness of their judgments, unlike politicians and bureaucrats, who have the material resources necessary to respond to judicial decisions. Drawing upon systematic analysis of all decisions of the Russian Court (published and unpublished) and previously unavailable materials on their (non-)implementation, and resting on a combination of the approaches from comparative politics, law, and public administration, this book shows how and why judges attempted to reform Russia's governance and fought to ensure compliance with their judgments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929920732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929920732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511511226

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511511226

M3 - Book

SN - 9780511511226

SN - 9780521887434

BT - Judging Russia

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -