Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

State of the Art and Future Directions

Mohamed Teyeb Ould Ely, Dana Kamzabek, Dhritiman Chakraborty, Michael F. Doherty

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sulfur remains in the spotlight as a future cathode candidate for the post-lithium-ion age. This is primarily due to its low cost and high discharge capacity, two critical requirements for any future cathode material that seeks to dominate the market of portable electronic devices, electric transportation, and electric-grid energy storage. However, before Li-S batteries replace lithium ion batteries, several technical challenges need to be solved. Among these challenges are polysulfide containment, the increase of sulfur loading (which must be ≥4-6 mg cm -2 ), the increase of sulfur fraction to ≥70%, the increase of sulfur utilization to ≥80%, the decrease of the electrolyte/sulfur weight ratio (which must be in the range of 3:1 or lower), and the stability of lithium anode material. Besides traditional carbon coating strategies, recent novel strategies addressing each of these challenges have been reported. The main purpose of this work is to review the state of the art and summarize and shed light on the most promising recent discoveries related to each challenge. This review also addresses the role of the electrolyte systems and electrocatalytic additives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1783-1814
Number of pages32
JournalACS Applied Energy Materials
Volume1
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 29 2018

Fingerprint

Sulfur
Lithium
Electrolytes
Cathodes
Polysulfides
Energy storage
Anodes
Carbon
Lithium sulfur batteries
Direction compound
Ions
Coatings
Costs

Keywords

  • batteries beyond lithium
  • electrocatalytic polysulfides conversion
  • lithium anode protection
  • lithium-sulfur batteries
  • solid-state electrolytes
  • sulfur cathode coating

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous)
  • Electrochemistry
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Teyeb Ould Ely, M., Kamzabek, D., Chakraborty, D., & Doherty, M. F. (2018). Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: State of the Art and Future Directions. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 1(5), 1783-1814. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.7b00153

Lithium-Sulfur Batteries : State of the Art and Future Directions. / Teyeb Ould Ely, Mohamed; Kamzabek, Dana; Chakraborty, Dhritiman; Doherty, Michael F.

In: ACS Applied Energy Materials, Vol. 1, No. 5, 29.05.2018, p. 1783-1814.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Teyeb Ould Ely, M, Kamzabek, D, Chakraborty, D & Doherty, MF 2018, 'Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: State of the Art and Future Directions', ACS Applied Energy Materials, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 1783-1814. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.7b00153
Teyeb Ould Ely M, Kamzabek D, Chakraborty D, Doherty MF. Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: State of the Art and Future Directions. ACS Applied Energy Materials. 2018 May 29;1(5):1783-1814. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.7b00153
Teyeb Ould Ely, Mohamed ; Kamzabek, Dana ; Chakraborty, Dhritiman ; Doherty, Michael F. / Lithium-Sulfur Batteries : State of the Art and Future Directions. In: ACS Applied Energy Materials. 2018 ; Vol. 1, No. 5. pp. 1783-1814.
@article{43f28ee72b624269ac6230b23d4f0faa,
title = "Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: State of the Art and Future Directions",
abstract = "Sulfur remains in the spotlight as a future cathode candidate for the post-lithium-ion age. This is primarily due to its low cost and high discharge capacity, two critical requirements for any future cathode material that seeks to dominate the market of portable electronic devices, electric transportation, and electric-grid energy storage. However, before Li-S batteries replace lithium ion batteries, several technical challenges need to be solved. Among these challenges are polysulfide containment, the increase of sulfur loading (which must be ≥4-6 mg cm -2 ), the increase of sulfur fraction to ≥70{\%}, the increase of sulfur utilization to ≥80{\%}, the decrease of the electrolyte/sulfur weight ratio (which must be in the range of 3:1 or lower), and the stability of lithium anode material. Besides traditional carbon coating strategies, recent novel strategies addressing each of these challenges have been reported. The main purpose of this work is to review the state of the art and summarize and shed light on the most promising recent discoveries related to each challenge. This review also addresses the role of the electrolyte systems and electrocatalytic additives.",
keywords = "batteries beyond lithium, electrocatalytic polysulfides conversion, lithium anode protection, lithium-sulfur batteries, solid-state electrolytes, sulfur cathode coating",
author = "{Teyeb Ould Ely}, Mohamed and Dana Kamzabek and Dhritiman Chakraborty and Doherty, {Michael F.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1021/acsaem.7b00153",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "1783--1814",
journal = "ACS Applied Energy Materials",
issn = "2574-0962",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

T2 - State of the Art and Future Directions

AU - Teyeb Ould Ely, Mohamed

AU - Kamzabek, Dana

AU - Chakraborty, Dhritiman

AU - Doherty, Michael F.

PY - 2018/5/29

Y1 - 2018/5/29

N2 - Sulfur remains in the spotlight as a future cathode candidate for the post-lithium-ion age. This is primarily due to its low cost and high discharge capacity, two critical requirements for any future cathode material that seeks to dominate the market of portable electronic devices, electric transportation, and electric-grid energy storage. However, before Li-S batteries replace lithium ion batteries, several technical challenges need to be solved. Among these challenges are polysulfide containment, the increase of sulfur loading (which must be ≥4-6 mg cm -2 ), the increase of sulfur fraction to ≥70%, the increase of sulfur utilization to ≥80%, the decrease of the electrolyte/sulfur weight ratio (which must be in the range of 3:1 or lower), and the stability of lithium anode material. Besides traditional carbon coating strategies, recent novel strategies addressing each of these challenges have been reported. The main purpose of this work is to review the state of the art and summarize and shed light on the most promising recent discoveries related to each challenge. This review also addresses the role of the electrolyte systems and electrocatalytic additives.

AB - Sulfur remains in the spotlight as a future cathode candidate for the post-lithium-ion age. This is primarily due to its low cost and high discharge capacity, two critical requirements for any future cathode material that seeks to dominate the market of portable electronic devices, electric transportation, and electric-grid energy storage. However, before Li-S batteries replace lithium ion batteries, several technical challenges need to be solved. Among these challenges are polysulfide containment, the increase of sulfur loading (which must be ≥4-6 mg cm -2 ), the increase of sulfur fraction to ≥70%, the increase of sulfur utilization to ≥80%, the decrease of the electrolyte/sulfur weight ratio (which must be in the range of 3:1 or lower), and the stability of lithium anode material. Besides traditional carbon coating strategies, recent novel strategies addressing each of these challenges have been reported. The main purpose of this work is to review the state of the art and summarize and shed light on the most promising recent discoveries related to each challenge. This review also addresses the role of the electrolyte systems and electrocatalytic additives.

KW - batteries beyond lithium

KW - electrocatalytic polysulfides conversion

KW - lithium anode protection

KW - lithium-sulfur batteries

KW - solid-state electrolytes

KW - sulfur cathode coating

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059336018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059336018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/acsaem.7b00153

DO - 10.1021/acsaem.7b00153

M3 - Review article

VL - 1

SP - 1783

EP - 1814

JO - ACS Applied Energy Materials

JF - ACS Applied Energy Materials

SN - 2574-0962

IS - 5

ER -