TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanical characteristics of CSA-treated sand reinforced with fiber under freeze-thaw cycles
AU - Rauf, Ayesha
AU - Moon, Sung Woo
AU - Lim, Chang Keun
AU - Satyanaga, Alfrendo
AU - Kim, Jong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Earth structures like roads and railways in cold regions face recurring freeze-thaw (F-T) cycles, leading to issues often overlooked by design guidelines that focus primarily on strength, neglecting long-term stability and durability. To improve soil properties, soil stabilization with ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is common, but it has a high carbon footprint. This study explores the use of calcium sulfoaluminate (CSA) cement as a lower-carbon alternative. Samples were created with varying CSA cement (3 %, 5 %, 7 %) and polypropylene fiber (PPF) (0–1 %), then subjected to multiple F-T cycles. Tests like unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) revealed that optimal fiber content varies with cement ratios, with excess fiber reducing strength. As the PPF content increases, the UPV value increases until it reaches the optimal value. By utilizing 5 % and 7 % CC, the UCS strength initially increases until 0.25 % PPF, then declines. In contrast, for samples reinforced with 3 % CC, the UCS value increases with PPF content up to 1 %. A similar trend was observed in the UCS test, where adding fiber dosage beyond the optimum limit caused strength reduction. Additionally, the study found that F-T cycles weaken soil by creating voids and pores, with excess fiber leading to overlapping that weakens cement-soil bonds. Stress-strain curves indicated improved ductility and durability with PPF, but resilience modulus and durability index declined with more F-T cycles. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) confirmed these findings, highlighting the impact of voids, pores, and fiber on soil structure. The study aims to develop more durable and eco-friendly construction methods for cold environments.
AB - Earth structures like roads and railways in cold regions face recurring freeze-thaw (F-T) cycles, leading to issues often overlooked by design guidelines that focus primarily on strength, neglecting long-term stability and durability. To improve soil properties, soil stabilization with ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is common, but it has a high carbon footprint. This study explores the use of calcium sulfoaluminate (CSA) cement as a lower-carbon alternative. Samples were created with varying CSA cement (3 %, 5 %, 7 %) and polypropylene fiber (PPF) (0–1 %), then subjected to multiple F-T cycles. Tests like unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) revealed that optimal fiber content varies with cement ratios, with excess fiber reducing strength. As the PPF content increases, the UPV value increases until it reaches the optimal value. By utilizing 5 % and 7 % CC, the UCS strength initially increases until 0.25 % PPF, then declines. In contrast, for samples reinforced with 3 % CC, the UCS value increases with PPF content up to 1 %. A similar trend was observed in the UCS test, where adding fiber dosage beyond the optimum limit caused strength reduction. Additionally, the study found that F-T cycles weaken soil by creating voids and pores, with excess fiber leading to overlapping that weakens cement-soil bonds. Stress-strain curves indicated improved ductility and durability with PPF, but resilience modulus and durability index declined with more F-T cycles. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) confirmed these findings, highlighting the impact of voids, pores, and fiber on soil structure. The study aims to develop more durable and eco-friendly construction methods for cold environments.
KW - Calcium sulfoaluminate
KW - Polypropylene fiber
KW - Quartz sand
KW - Ultra-sonic pulse velocity
KW - Unconfined compressive strength
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206606644&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85206606644&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03875
DO - 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03875
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85206606644
SN - 2214-5095
VL - 21
JO - Case Studies in Construction Materials
JF - Case Studies in Construction Materials
M1 - e03875
ER -