Meddling with justice: Competitive politics, impunity, and distrusted courts in post-orange Ukraine

Alexei Trochev

doi:10.3200/DEMO.18.2.122-147

Meddling with justice: Competitive politics, impunity, and distrusted courts in post-orange Ukraine

Alexei Trochev

Political Science and International Relations Department

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Contrary to the theories of judicial empowerment that argue that the presence of strong political opposition is necessary for the development of an independent judiciary, the increasing fragmentation of power in today's Ukraine goes hand-in-hand with judicial disempowerment-dependent courts regularly provide important benefits to rival elites.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	122-147
Number of pages	26
Journal	Demokratizatsiya
Volume	18
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3200/DEMO.18.2.122-147
Publication status	Published - Apr 1 2010

Keywords

fragmentation of power
impunity
judicial corruption
judicial independence
post-Communism
ukraine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Geography, Planning and Development
Political Science and International Relations

Access to Document

10.3200/DEMO.18.2.122-147

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Meddling with justice: Competitive politics, impunity, and distrusted courts in post-orange Ukraine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Trochev, A. (2010). Meddling with justice: Competitive politics, impunity, and distrusted courts in post-orange Ukraine. Demokratizatsiya, 18(2), 122-147. https://doi.org/10.3200/DEMO.18.2.122-147

@article{440a9f8b51704872a0ba70ba6e44bbec,

title = "Meddling with justice: Competitive politics, impunity, and distrusted courts in post-orange Ukraine",

abstract = "Contrary to the theories of judicial empowerment that argue that the presence of strong political opposition is necessary for the development of an independent judiciary, the increasing fragmentation of power in today's Ukraine goes hand-in-hand with judicial disempowerment-dependent courts regularly provide important benefits to rival elites.",

keywords = "fragmentation of power, impunity, judicial corruption, judicial independence, post-Communism, ukraine",

author = "Alexei Trochev",

year = "2010",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.3200/DEMO.18.2.122-147",

language = "English",

volume = "18",

pages = "122--147",

journal = "Demokratizatsiya",

issn = "1074-6846",

publisher = "Heldref Publications",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meddling with justice

T2 - Competitive politics, impunity, and distrusted courts in post-orange Ukraine

AU - Trochev, Alexei

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - Contrary to the theories of judicial empowerment that argue that the presence of strong political opposition is necessary for the development of an independent judiciary, the increasing fragmentation of power in today's Ukraine goes hand-in-hand with judicial disempowerment-dependent courts regularly provide important benefits to rival elites.

AB - Contrary to the theories of judicial empowerment that argue that the presence of strong political opposition is necessary for the development of an independent judiciary, the increasing fragmentation of power in today's Ukraine goes hand-in-hand with judicial disempowerment-dependent courts regularly provide important benefits to rival elites.

KW - fragmentation of power

KW - impunity

KW - judicial corruption

KW - judicial independence

KW - post-Communism

KW - ukraine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954039335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954039335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3200/DEMO.18.2.122-147

DO - 10.3200/DEMO.18.2.122-147

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77954039335

VL - 18

SP - 122

EP - 147

JO - Demokratizatsiya

JF - Demokratizatsiya

SN - 1074-6846

IS - 2

ER -