TY - JOUR
T1 - Methods of accelerating chloride-induced corrosion in steel-reinforced concrete
T2 - A comparative review
AU - Feng, Weipeng
AU - Tarakbay, Anel
AU - Ali Memon, Shazim
AU - Tang, Waiching
AU - Cui, Hongzhi
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China ( 2019YFC1907203 ) and Nazarbayev University Faculty development competitive research grants (021220FD0651).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/6/28
Y1 - 2021/6/28
N2 - Rebar corrosion has been recognized as a major durability issue of the reinforced concrete (RC) structures over recent decades, prompting the necessity to study the corrosion behavior of steel in concrete during the service life. To estimate service life of RC structure, the corrosion of reinforcing steel is generally accelerated by means of the impressed current technique in limited available time. In the literature, several accelerated laboratory corrosion methods have been proposed, however the results varied greatly as chloride concentrations and testing conditions were different. Researchers are unsure which testing methods can be used to give reliable results to simulate the real-life corroded RC structure. This review paper aims to systematically compare and evaluate different methods of accelerating chloride-induced corrosion of steel reinforcement in concrete. First, the accelerated methods categorized into three groups namely, the impressed current (IC), the chloride ion diffusion (CID) and the artificial climate environment (ACE) are briefly discussed. Then, the key influencing factors (i.e. current density, salt concentration, service load) affecting the corrosion results in different methods are compared and evaluated. Finally, the corrosion products and acceleration method are comprehensively discussed. By this comparative review, it is believed that researchers can have a better understanding of different accelerated corrosion methods along with the influencing factors. So they could select or even develop the most suitable techniques to yield reliable corrosion test results.
AB - Rebar corrosion has been recognized as a major durability issue of the reinforced concrete (RC) structures over recent decades, prompting the necessity to study the corrosion behavior of steel in concrete during the service life. To estimate service life of RC structure, the corrosion of reinforcing steel is generally accelerated by means of the impressed current technique in limited available time. In the literature, several accelerated laboratory corrosion methods have been proposed, however the results varied greatly as chloride concentrations and testing conditions were different. Researchers are unsure which testing methods can be used to give reliable results to simulate the real-life corroded RC structure. This review paper aims to systematically compare and evaluate different methods of accelerating chloride-induced corrosion of steel reinforcement in concrete. First, the accelerated methods categorized into three groups namely, the impressed current (IC), the chloride ion diffusion (CID) and the artificial climate environment (ACE) are briefly discussed. Then, the key influencing factors (i.e. current density, salt concentration, service load) affecting the corrosion results in different methods are compared and evaluated. Finally, the corrosion products and acceleration method are comprehensively discussed. By this comparative review, it is believed that researchers can have a better understanding of different accelerated corrosion methods along with the influencing factors. So they could select or even develop the most suitable techniques to yield reliable corrosion test results.
KW - Artificial climate environment
KW - Chloride ion diffusion in concrete
KW - Corrosion products
KW - Impressed current method
KW - Mass loss
KW - Natural corrosion
KW - Rebar corrosion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103787807&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85103787807&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123165
DO - 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123165
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85103787807
SN - 0950-0618
VL - 289
JO - Construction and Building Materials
JF - Construction and Building Materials
M1 - 123165
ER -