Most even budged yet

Some cases for game-theoretic semantics in natural language

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explores ways of expanding the logical and linguistic theory known as game-theoretic semantics (GTS) to cover some new linguistic categories and expressions. I will show the applicability and relevance of GTS to a cross-sample of linguistic categories, ranging from polarity items (many of which are lexical), the morpheme even, and adverbs of quantification, to the realm of generalised quantifiers. I will also suggest how eventualities can be dealt with in a game-theoretic way. I argue that in each of the cases, GTS provides a theoretically motivated methodological foundation in its treatment of these constructions, and that its potentials are evident in many other linguistic categories as well, seen from the cross-categorial phenomenon of informational independence, which in this paper is illustrated in terms of eventualities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-54
Number of pages35
JournalTheoretical Linguistics
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

semantics
linguistics
language
quantification
Natural Language
Eventuality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Most even budged yet : Some cases for game-theoretic semantics in natural language. / Pietarinen, Ahti.

In: Theoretical Linguistics, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.01.2001, p. 20-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{48863d4e1e55463880590cd98c8617aa,
title = "Most even budged yet: Some cases for game-theoretic semantics in natural language",
abstract = "This paper explores ways of expanding the logical and linguistic theory known as game-theoretic semantics (GTS) to cover some new linguistic categories and expressions. I will show the applicability and relevance of GTS to a cross-sample of linguistic categories, ranging from polarity items (many of which are lexical), the morpheme even, and adverbs of quantification, to the realm of generalised quantifiers. I will also suggest how eventualities can be dealt with in a game-theoretic way. I argue that in each of the cases, GTS provides a theoretically motivated methodological foundation in its treatment of these constructions, and that its potentials are evident in many other linguistic categories as well, seen from the cross-categorial phenomenon of informational independence, which in this paper is illustrated in terms of eventualities.",
author = "Ahti Pietarinen",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/thli.2001.27.1.20",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "20--54",
journal = "Theoretical Linguistics",
issn = "0301-4428",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Most even budged yet

T2 - Some cases for game-theoretic semantics in natural language

AU - Pietarinen, Ahti

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - This paper explores ways of expanding the logical and linguistic theory known as game-theoretic semantics (GTS) to cover some new linguistic categories and expressions. I will show the applicability and relevance of GTS to a cross-sample of linguistic categories, ranging from polarity items (many of which are lexical), the morpheme even, and adverbs of quantification, to the realm of generalised quantifiers. I will also suggest how eventualities can be dealt with in a game-theoretic way. I argue that in each of the cases, GTS provides a theoretically motivated methodological foundation in its treatment of these constructions, and that its potentials are evident in many other linguistic categories as well, seen from the cross-categorial phenomenon of informational independence, which in this paper is illustrated in terms of eventualities.

AB - This paper explores ways of expanding the logical and linguistic theory known as game-theoretic semantics (GTS) to cover some new linguistic categories and expressions. I will show the applicability and relevance of GTS to a cross-sample of linguistic categories, ranging from polarity items (many of which are lexical), the morpheme even, and adverbs of quantification, to the realm of generalised quantifiers. I will also suggest how eventualities can be dealt with in a game-theoretic way. I argue that in each of the cases, GTS provides a theoretically motivated methodological foundation in its treatment of these constructions, and that its potentials are evident in many other linguistic categories as well, seen from the cross-categorial phenomenon of informational independence, which in this paper is illustrated in terms of eventualities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937344991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937344991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/thli.2001.27.1.20

DO - 10.1515/thli.2001.27.1.20

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 20

EP - 54

JO - Theoretical Linguistics

JF - Theoretical Linguistics

SN - 0301-4428

IS - 1

ER -