Moving pictures of thought II

Graphs, games, and pragmaticism's proofs

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Peirce believed that his pragmaticism can be conclusively proven. Beginning in 1903, he drafted several attempts, ending by 1908 with a semeiotic proof. Around 1905, he exposes the proof using the theory of Existential Graphs (EGs). This paper modernizes the semantics Peirce proposed for EGs in terms of game-theoretic semantics (GTS). Peirce's 1905 proof is then reconstructed in three parts, by (1) relating pragmaticism to the GTS conception of meaning, (2) showing that Peirce's proof is an argument for a relational structure of the meaning of intellectual signs that our interpretative and strategic practices give rise to, and (3) bringing out the key links between EGs and pragmaticism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-331
Number of pages17
JournalSemiotica
Volume2011
Issue number186
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

semantics
Pragmaticism
Graph
Thought
Existential Graphs

Keywords

  • Existential graphs
  • Game-theoretic semantics
  • Meaning
  • Peirce
  • Pragmaticism
  • Proof

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

Moving pictures of thought II : Graphs, games, and pragmaticism's proofs. / Pietarinen, Ahti Veikko.

In: Semiotica, Vol. 2011, No. 186, 01.08.2011, p. 315-331.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{4e38f31d440e4c8e800815955d6dd5f6,
title = "Moving pictures of thought II: Graphs, games, and pragmaticism's proofs",
abstract = "Peirce believed that his pragmaticism can be conclusively proven. Beginning in 1903, he drafted several attempts, ending by 1908 with a semeiotic proof. Around 1905, he exposes the proof using the theory of Existential Graphs (EGs). This paper modernizes the semantics Peirce proposed for EGs in terms of game-theoretic semantics (GTS). Peirce's 1905 proof is then reconstructed in three parts, by (1) relating pragmaticism to the GTS conception of meaning, (2) showing that Peirce's proof is an argument for a relational structure of the meaning of intellectual signs that our interpretative and strategic practices give rise to, and (3) bringing out the key links between EGs and pragmaticism.",
keywords = "Existential graphs, Game-theoretic semantics, Meaning, Peirce, Pragmaticism, Proof",
author = "Pietarinen, {Ahti Veikko}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/semi.2011.058",
language = "English",
volume = "2011",
pages = "315--331",
journal = "Semiotica",
issn = "0037-1998",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "186",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moving pictures of thought II

T2 - Graphs, games, and pragmaticism's proofs

AU - Pietarinen, Ahti Veikko

PY - 2011/8/1

Y1 - 2011/8/1

N2 - Peirce believed that his pragmaticism can be conclusively proven. Beginning in 1903, he drafted several attempts, ending by 1908 with a semeiotic proof. Around 1905, he exposes the proof using the theory of Existential Graphs (EGs). This paper modernizes the semantics Peirce proposed for EGs in terms of game-theoretic semantics (GTS). Peirce's 1905 proof is then reconstructed in three parts, by (1) relating pragmaticism to the GTS conception of meaning, (2) showing that Peirce's proof is an argument for a relational structure of the meaning of intellectual signs that our interpretative and strategic practices give rise to, and (3) bringing out the key links between EGs and pragmaticism.

AB - Peirce believed that his pragmaticism can be conclusively proven. Beginning in 1903, he drafted several attempts, ending by 1908 with a semeiotic proof. Around 1905, he exposes the proof using the theory of Existential Graphs (EGs). This paper modernizes the semantics Peirce proposed for EGs in terms of game-theoretic semantics (GTS). Peirce's 1905 proof is then reconstructed in three parts, by (1) relating pragmaticism to the GTS conception of meaning, (2) showing that Peirce's proof is an argument for a relational structure of the meaning of intellectual signs that our interpretative and strategic practices give rise to, and (3) bringing out the key links between EGs and pragmaticism.

KW - Existential graphs

KW - Game-theoretic semantics

KW - Meaning

KW - Peirce

KW - Pragmaticism

KW - Proof

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051902005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051902005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/semi.2011.058

DO - 10.1515/semi.2011.058

M3 - Review article

VL - 2011

SP - 315

EP - 331

JO - Semiotica

JF - Semiotica

SN - 0037-1998

IS - 186

ER -