Nihil novi sub sole? Executive power, the Italian parlamento and the ‘war on terror’

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines whether the balance of executive and legislative power in Italy changed over the course of the so-called ‘war on terror’ initiated by 9/11, 7/7, and other terrorist attacks. The discussion analyses ‘war on terror’-related legislative proposals introduced by the Berlusconi and Prodi governments, the nature of the proposed legislation, the parliamentary debates and votes on the proposals, and the effectiveness of the Italian Parliament's oversight. The article shows that Italy already had a legacy of counter-terrorist legislation on its statute books arising from its previous history of domestic terrorism. After 9/11, the Italian government did not use the new terrorist emergency to push a new counter-terrorism agenda and the balance of legislative and executive power remained static.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277-293
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Legislative Studies
Volume15
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

executive power
terrorism
Italy
legislation
parliamentary debate
statute
parliament
voter

Keywords

  • Cartel
  • Italy
  • Parlamento
  • Polarisation
  • Second Republic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Law

Cite this

Nihil novi sub sole? Executive power, the Italian parlamento and the ‘war on terror’. / Pelizzo, Riccardo.

In: Journal of Legislative Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2-3, 01.01.2009, p. 277-293.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1a7f18923484457b99e2b41459d6e230,
title = "Nihil novi sub sole? Executive power, the Italian parlamento and the ‘war on terror’",
abstract = "This article examines whether the balance of executive and legislative power in Italy changed over the course of the so-called ‘war on terror’ initiated by 9/11, 7/7, and other terrorist attacks. The discussion analyses ‘war on terror’-related legislative proposals introduced by the Berlusconi and Prodi governments, the nature of the proposed legislation, the parliamentary debates and votes on the proposals, and the effectiveness of the Italian Parliament's oversight. The article shows that Italy already had a legacy of counter-terrorist legislation on its statute books arising from its previous history of domestic terrorism. After 9/11, the Italian government did not use the new terrorist emergency to push a new counter-terrorism agenda and the balance of legislative and executive power remained static.",
keywords = "Cartel, Italy, Parlamento, Polarisation, Second Republic",
author = "Riccardo Pelizzo",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13572330902933441",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "277--293",
journal = "The Journal of Legislative Studies",
issn = "1357-2334",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nihil novi sub sole? Executive power, the Italian parlamento and the ‘war on terror’

AU - Pelizzo, Riccardo

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - This article examines whether the balance of executive and legislative power in Italy changed over the course of the so-called ‘war on terror’ initiated by 9/11, 7/7, and other terrorist attacks. The discussion analyses ‘war on terror’-related legislative proposals introduced by the Berlusconi and Prodi governments, the nature of the proposed legislation, the parliamentary debates and votes on the proposals, and the effectiveness of the Italian Parliament's oversight. The article shows that Italy already had a legacy of counter-terrorist legislation on its statute books arising from its previous history of domestic terrorism. After 9/11, the Italian government did not use the new terrorist emergency to push a new counter-terrorism agenda and the balance of legislative and executive power remained static.

AB - This article examines whether the balance of executive and legislative power in Italy changed over the course of the so-called ‘war on terror’ initiated by 9/11, 7/7, and other terrorist attacks. The discussion analyses ‘war on terror’-related legislative proposals introduced by the Berlusconi and Prodi governments, the nature of the proposed legislation, the parliamentary debates and votes on the proposals, and the effectiveness of the Italian Parliament's oversight. The article shows that Italy already had a legacy of counter-terrorist legislation on its statute books arising from its previous history of domestic terrorism. After 9/11, the Italian government did not use the new terrorist emergency to push a new counter-terrorism agenda and the balance of legislative and executive power remained static.

KW - Cartel

KW - Italy

KW - Parlamento

KW - Polarisation

KW - Second Republic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054939178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054939178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13572330902933441

DO - 10.1080/13572330902933441

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 277

EP - 293

JO - The Journal of Legislative Studies

JF - The Journal of Legislative Studies

SN - 1357-2334

IS - 2-3

ER -