TY - JOUR
T1 - Noble Paganism
T2 - Orientalist Discourse on Tibetan Buddhism in Nineteenth-Century Russian Polemic Literature
AU - Tsyrempilov, Nikolay
N1 - Funding Information:
The paper is published with support of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation within the frames of the basic part of the Government Task (project # 3797). I thank Barbara Walker, Matthew Mosca and Edyta Bojanowska for their invaluable help in editing and translating this paper into English, as well as for reviewing this manuscript with painstaking care. I am grateful to anonymous reviewers who helped me improve this paper and re-consider some of my initial statements.
Publisher Copyright:
© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Tibetan Buddhism, in the eyes of Orthodox Christian polemicists, was always seen as a harmful paganism, and fighting against this 'superstition' was a high priority. Based on analysis of nineteenth-century Russian Orthodox missionary articles, this paper examines the stereotyped portrayal of Tibetan Buddhism as a civilisational opponent to Christianity, and the ways Russian scholars, ethnographers, philosophers, and officials either supported or challenged this view. In this paper, I argue that, in Russia, the Orientalist paradigm is common to a greater degree among Christian clergy than in academic circles due to the status of a dominating religion the Orthodoxy enjoyed in Russia. The Russian missionaries' support of imperial power was the essential factor. The clerics viewed themselves as carriers not only of Christian values, but also of the idea of Russian statehood and European civilisation in general. Russian Christian intellectuals repeatedly attempted to comprehend Buddhism rationally, but these attempts were highly formalistic. For them, academic study was never an end in itself, but, I argue, a convenient tool to achieve ideological domination and establish moral authority. However, their intellectual and psychological inability to view other religions as different, rather than false, was, and still is, an obstacle to mutual understanding and respect between Christianity and Buddhism in today's Russia.
AB - Tibetan Buddhism, in the eyes of Orthodox Christian polemicists, was always seen as a harmful paganism, and fighting against this 'superstition' was a high priority. Based on analysis of nineteenth-century Russian Orthodox missionary articles, this paper examines the stereotyped portrayal of Tibetan Buddhism as a civilisational opponent to Christianity, and the ways Russian scholars, ethnographers, philosophers, and officials either supported or challenged this view. In this paper, I argue that, in Russia, the Orientalist paradigm is common to a greater degree among Christian clergy than in academic circles due to the status of a dominating religion the Orthodoxy enjoyed in Russia. The Russian missionaries' support of imperial power was the essential factor. The clerics viewed themselves as carriers not only of Christian values, but also of the idea of Russian statehood and European civilisation in general. Russian Christian intellectuals repeatedly attempted to comprehend Buddhism rationally, but these attempts were highly formalistic. For them, academic study was never an end in itself, but, I argue, a convenient tool to achieve ideological domination and establish moral authority. However, their intellectual and psychological inability to view other religions as different, rather than false, was, and still is, an obstacle to mutual understanding and respect between Christianity and Buddhism in today's Russia.
KW - Russian Orthodox Church
KW - Russian empire
KW - Tibetan Buddhism
KW - missionaries
KW - orientalism
KW - polemic literature
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954553341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954553341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1163/22105018-12340042
DO - 10.1163/22105018-12340042
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84954553341
SN - 1464-8172
VL - 17
SP - 199
EP - 224
JO - Inner Asia
JF - Inner Asia
IS - 2
ER -