Noble Paganism

Orientalist Discourse on Tibetan Buddhism in Nineteenth-Century Russian Polemic Literature

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Tibetan Buddhism, in the eyes of Orthodox Christian polemicists, was always seen as a harmful paganism, and fighting against this 'superstition' was a high priority. Based on analysis of nineteenth-century Russian Orthodox missionary articles, this paper examines the stereotyped portrayal of Tibetan Buddhism as a civilisational opponent to Christianity, and the ways Russian scholars, ethnographers, philosophers, and officials either supported or challenged this view. In this paper, I argue that, in Russia, the Orientalist paradigm is common to a greater degree among Christian clergy than in academic circles due to the status of a dominating religion the Orthodoxy enjoyed in Russia. The Russian missionaries' support of imperial power was the essential factor. The clerics viewed themselves as carriers not only of Christian values, but also of the idea of Russian statehood and European civilisation in general. Russian Christian intellectuals repeatedly attempted to comprehend Buddhism rationally, but these attempts were highly formalistic. For them, academic study was never an end in itself, but, I argue, a convenient tool to achieve ideological domination and establish moral authority. However, their intellectual and psychological inability to view other religions as different, rather than false, was, and still is, an obstacle to mutual understanding and respect between Christianity and Buddhism in today's Russia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-224
Number of pages26
JournalInner Asia
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Christianity
Buddhism
religion
nineteenth century
Russia
discourse
missionary
civilization
fighting
Religion
statehood
studies (academic)
superstition
clergy
intellectual
domination
respect
paradigm
literature
Tibetan Buddhism

Keywords

  • missionaries
  • orientalism
  • polemic literature
  • Russian empire
  • Russian Orthodox Church
  • Tibetan Buddhism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Anthropology

Cite this

Noble Paganism : Orientalist Discourse on Tibetan Buddhism in Nineteenth-Century Russian Polemic Literature. / Tsyrempilov, Nikolay.

In: Inner Asia, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2015, p. 199-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a70c8ac368bb4301956c7dcd1a2ab953,
title = "Noble Paganism: Orientalist Discourse on Tibetan Buddhism in Nineteenth-Century Russian Polemic Literature",
abstract = "Tibetan Buddhism, in the eyes of Orthodox Christian polemicists, was always seen as a harmful paganism, and fighting against this 'superstition' was a high priority. Based on analysis of nineteenth-century Russian Orthodox missionary articles, this paper examines the stereotyped portrayal of Tibetan Buddhism as a civilisational opponent to Christianity, and the ways Russian scholars, ethnographers, philosophers, and officials either supported or challenged this view. In this paper, I argue that, in Russia, the Orientalist paradigm is common to a greater degree among Christian clergy than in academic circles due to the status of a dominating religion the Orthodoxy enjoyed in Russia. The Russian missionaries' support of imperial power was the essential factor. The clerics viewed themselves as carriers not only of Christian values, but also of the idea of Russian statehood and European civilisation in general. Russian Christian intellectuals repeatedly attempted to comprehend Buddhism rationally, but these attempts were highly formalistic. For them, academic study was never an end in itself, but, I argue, a convenient tool to achieve ideological domination and establish moral authority. However, their intellectual and psychological inability to view other religions as different, rather than false, was, and still is, an obstacle to mutual understanding and respect between Christianity and Buddhism in today's Russia.",
keywords = "missionaries, orientalism, polemic literature, Russian empire, Russian Orthodox Church, Tibetan Buddhism",
author = "Nikolay Tsyrempilov",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1163/22105018-12340042",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "199--224",
journal = "Inner Asia",
issn = "1464-8172",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Noble Paganism

T2 - Orientalist Discourse on Tibetan Buddhism in Nineteenth-Century Russian Polemic Literature

AU - Tsyrempilov, Nikolay

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Tibetan Buddhism, in the eyes of Orthodox Christian polemicists, was always seen as a harmful paganism, and fighting against this 'superstition' was a high priority. Based on analysis of nineteenth-century Russian Orthodox missionary articles, this paper examines the stereotyped portrayal of Tibetan Buddhism as a civilisational opponent to Christianity, and the ways Russian scholars, ethnographers, philosophers, and officials either supported or challenged this view. In this paper, I argue that, in Russia, the Orientalist paradigm is common to a greater degree among Christian clergy than in academic circles due to the status of a dominating religion the Orthodoxy enjoyed in Russia. The Russian missionaries' support of imperial power was the essential factor. The clerics viewed themselves as carriers not only of Christian values, but also of the idea of Russian statehood and European civilisation in general. Russian Christian intellectuals repeatedly attempted to comprehend Buddhism rationally, but these attempts were highly formalistic. For them, academic study was never an end in itself, but, I argue, a convenient tool to achieve ideological domination and establish moral authority. However, their intellectual and psychological inability to view other religions as different, rather than false, was, and still is, an obstacle to mutual understanding and respect between Christianity and Buddhism in today's Russia.

AB - Tibetan Buddhism, in the eyes of Orthodox Christian polemicists, was always seen as a harmful paganism, and fighting against this 'superstition' was a high priority. Based on analysis of nineteenth-century Russian Orthodox missionary articles, this paper examines the stereotyped portrayal of Tibetan Buddhism as a civilisational opponent to Christianity, and the ways Russian scholars, ethnographers, philosophers, and officials either supported or challenged this view. In this paper, I argue that, in Russia, the Orientalist paradigm is common to a greater degree among Christian clergy than in academic circles due to the status of a dominating religion the Orthodoxy enjoyed in Russia. The Russian missionaries' support of imperial power was the essential factor. The clerics viewed themselves as carriers not only of Christian values, but also of the idea of Russian statehood and European civilisation in general. Russian Christian intellectuals repeatedly attempted to comprehend Buddhism rationally, but these attempts were highly formalistic. For them, academic study was never an end in itself, but, I argue, a convenient tool to achieve ideological domination and establish moral authority. However, their intellectual and psychological inability to view other religions as different, rather than false, was, and still is, an obstacle to mutual understanding and respect between Christianity and Buddhism in today's Russia.

KW - missionaries

KW - orientalism

KW - polemic literature

KW - Russian empire

KW - Russian Orthodox Church

KW - Tibetan Buddhism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954553341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954553341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/22105018-12340042

DO - 10.1163/22105018-12340042

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 199

EP - 224

JO - Inner Asia

JF - Inner Asia

SN - 1464-8172

IS - 2

ER -