Numerical and experimental comparative study of strength-optimised AGMA and FZG spur gears

V. Spitas, C. Spitas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In standard gear pairs there is typically a discrepancy between the bending strength of the pinion and the wheel, with the pinion being the weakest. Smaller pinion tooth numbers, typical of automotive gearing, further increase this problem and different optimised design solutions, based on long addendum modifications, have been proposed by the American Gear Manufacturers Association (AGMA) and the German organisation for gear research Forschungsstelle für Zahnräder und Getriebebau (FZG). AGMA favours a compromise between the strength of the pinion and the wheel (balanced bending strength), while FZG strengthens both pinion and wheel using bigger addendum modifications and a correspondingly bigger centre distance (maximum bending strength with balanced sliding velocities). A comprehensive comparison of the two methods does not exist in the literature because the shifting employed by the FZG recommendation exceeds the normal tabulated J-factor ranges and, because of the large number of design variables involved (i.e., number of teeth, pinion and wheel shift etc.). This paper uses non-dimensional modelling to decrease the number of independent design variables in conjunction with Boundary Element Analysis and photoelasticity measurements to compare the bending strength of all AGMA and FZG designs in the region of their intended use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-126
Number of pages14
JournalActa Mechanica
Volume193
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spur gears
Gears
Bending strength
Wheels
Gear teeth
Photoelasticity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Computational Mechanics

Cite this

Numerical and experimental comparative study of strength-optimised AGMA and FZG spur gears. / Spitas, V.; Spitas, C.

In: Acta Mechanica, Vol. 193, No. 1-2, 09.2007, p. 113-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1ca3794bedf542d3a5875f25133a0511,
title = "Numerical and experimental comparative study of strength-optimised AGMA and FZG spur gears",
abstract = "In standard gear pairs there is typically a discrepancy between the bending strength of the pinion and the wheel, with the pinion being the weakest. Smaller pinion tooth numbers, typical of automotive gearing, further increase this problem and different optimised design solutions, based on long addendum modifications, have been proposed by the American Gear Manufacturers Association (AGMA) and the German organisation for gear research Forschungsstelle f{\"u}r Zahnr{\"a}der und Getriebebau (FZG). AGMA favours a compromise between the strength of the pinion and the wheel (balanced bending strength), while FZG strengthens both pinion and wheel using bigger addendum modifications and a correspondingly bigger centre distance (maximum bending strength with balanced sliding velocities). A comprehensive comparison of the two methods does not exist in the literature because the shifting employed by the FZG recommendation exceeds the normal tabulated J-factor ranges and, because of the large number of design variables involved (i.e., number of teeth, pinion and wheel shift etc.). This paper uses non-dimensional modelling to decrease the number of independent design variables in conjunction with Boundary Element Analysis and photoelasticity measurements to compare the bending strength of all AGMA and FZG designs in the region of their intended use.",
author = "V. Spitas and C. Spitas",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s00707-006-0384-x",
language = "English",
volume = "193",
pages = "113--126",
journal = "Acta Mechanica",
issn = "0001-5970",
publisher = "Springer Wien",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Numerical and experimental comparative study of strength-optimised AGMA and FZG spur gears

AU - Spitas, V.

AU - Spitas, C.

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - In standard gear pairs there is typically a discrepancy between the bending strength of the pinion and the wheel, with the pinion being the weakest. Smaller pinion tooth numbers, typical of automotive gearing, further increase this problem and different optimised design solutions, based on long addendum modifications, have been proposed by the American Gear Manufacturers Association (AGMA) and the German organisation for gear research Forschungsstelle für Zahnräder und Getriebebau (FZG). AGMA favours a compromise between the strength of the pinion and the wheel (balanced bending strength), while FZG strengthens both pinion and wheel using bigger addendum modifications and a correspondingly bigger centre distance (maximum bending strength with balanced sliding velocities). A comprehensive comparison of the two methods does not exist in the literature because the shifting employed by the FZG recommendation exceeds the normal tabulated J-factor ranges and, because of the large number of design variables involved (i.e., number of teeth, pinion and wheel shift etc.). This paper uses non-dimensional modelling to decrease the number of independent design variables in conjunction with Boundary Element Analysis and photoelasticity measurements to compare the bending strength of all AGMA and FZG designs in the region of their intended use.

AB - In standard gear pairs there is typically a discrepancy between the bending strength of the pinion and the wheel, with the pinion being the weakest. Smaller pinion tooth numbers, typical of automotive gearing, further increase this problem and different optimised design solutions, based on long addendum modifications, have been proposed by the American Gear Manufacturers Association (AGMA) and the German organisation for gear research Forschungsstelle für Zahnräder und Getriebebau (FZG). AGMA favours a compromise between the strength of the pinion and the wheel (balanced bending strength), while FZG strengthens both pinion and wheel using bigger addendum modifications and a correspondingly bigger centre distance (maximum bending strength with balanced sliding velocities). A comprehensive comparison of the two methods does not exist in the literature because the shifting employed by the FZG recommendation exceeds the normal tabulated J-factor ranges and, because of the large number of design variables involved (i.e., number of teeth, pinion and wheel shift etc.). This paper uses non-dimensional modelling to decrease the number of independent design variables in conjunction with Boundary Element Analysis and photoelasticity measurements to compare the bending strength of all AGMA and FZG designs in the region of their intended use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548236484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548236484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00707-006-0384-x

DO - 10.1007/s00707-006-0384-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34548236484

VL - 193

SP - 113

EP - 126

JO - Acta Mechanica

JF - Acta Mechanica

SN - 0001-5970

IS - 1-2

ER -