Peirce and the logic of image

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Peirce divided hypoicons into images, diagrams, and metaphors. For diagrams, he developed a logical theory of graphs: many-dimensional linguistic expressions analyzing meaning by virtue of iconicity of logical form. He neglected the logic of images as well as metaphors, however. Metaphors relate to nonstandard meanings that combine complex diagrammatic representations. Images are elementary constituents of qualitative space. I will argue that the interpretation of images corresponds to the interpretation of non-logical vocabularies. This raises the question of whether images are also linguistic, in other words whether the simple qualities they partake of are the simple qualities of some propositional content. I will argue that Peirce favored a picture theory of language that takes images to interpret elementary characters of objects that constitute propositions. He did not ascribe images with properties of propositions, as that would have rendered them non-hypoiconic signs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-261
Number of pages11
JournalSemiotica
Volume2012
Issue number192
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

metaphor
linguistics
interpretation
Logic
vocabulary
language
Diagrams
Picture Theory
Logical Form
Graph
Vocabulary
Constituent
Theory of Language
Propositional Content
Hypoicon
Iconicity

Keywords

  • Diagrams
  • Existential graphs
  • Image
  • Language
  • Logic
  • Peirce
  • Picture theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

Peirce and the logic of image. / Pietarinen, Ahti Veikko.

In: Semiotica, Vol. 2012, No. 192, 01.10.2012, p. 251-261.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pietarinen, Ahti Veikko. / Peirce and the logic of image. In: Semiotica. 2012 ; Vol. 2012, No. 192. pp. 251-261.
@article{b69b30f5f492452a933465b7f191cd86,
title = "Peirce and the logic of image",
abstract = "Peirce divided hypoicons into images, diagrams, and metaphors. For diagrams, he developed a logical theory of graphs: many-dimensional linguistic expressions analyzing meaning by virtue of iconicity of logical form. He neglected the logic of images as well as metaphors, however. Metaphors relate to nonstandard meanings that combine complex diagrammatic representations. Images are elementary constituents of qualitative space. I will argue that the interpretation of images corresponds to the interpretation of non-logical vocabularies. This raises the question of whether images are also linguistic, in other words whether the simple qualities they partake of are the simple qualities of some propositional content. I will argue that Peirce favored a picture theory of language that takes images to interpret elementary characters of objects that constitute propositions. He did not ascribe images with properties of propositions, as that would have rendered them non-hypoiconic signs.",
keywords = "Diagrams, Existential graphs, Image, Language, Logic, Peirce, Picture theory",
author = "Pietarinen, {Ahti Veikko}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/sem-2012-0083",
language = "English",
volume = "2012",
pages = "251--261",
journal = "Semiotica",
issn = "0037-1998",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "192",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peirce and the logic of image

AU - Pietarinen, Ahti Veikko

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - Peirce divided hypoicons into images, diagrams, and metaphors. For diagrams, he developed a logical theory of graphs: many-dimensional linguistic expressions analyzing meaning by virtue of iconicity of logical form. He neglected the logic of images as well as metaphors, however. Metaphors relate to nonstandard meanings that combine complex diagrammatic representations. Images are elementary constituents of qualitative space. I will argue that the interpretation of images corresponds to the interpretation of non-logical vocabularies. This raises the question of whether images are also linguistic, in other words whether the simple qualities they partake of are the simple qualities of some propositional content. I will argue that Peirce favored a picture theory of language that takes images to interpret elementary characters of objects that constitute propositions. He did not ascribe images with properties of propositions, as that would have rendered them non-hypoiconic signs.

AB - Peirce divided hypoicons into images, diagrams, and metaphors. For diagrams, he developed a logical theory of graphs: many-dimensional linguistic expressions analyzing meaning by virtue of iconicity of logical form. He neglected the logic of images as well as metaphors, however. Metaphors relate to nonstandard meanings that combine complex diagrammatic representations. Images are elementary constituents of qualitative space. I will argue that the interpretation of images corresponds to the interpretation of non-logical vocabularies. This raises the question of whether images are also linguistic, in other words whether the simple qualities they partake of are the simple qualities of some propositional content. I will argue that Peirce favored a picture theory of language that takes images to interpret elementary characters of objects that constitute propositions. He did not ascribe images with properties of propositions, as that would have rendered them non-hypoiconic signs.

KW - Diagrams

KW - Existential graphs

KW - Image

KW - Language

KW - Logic

KW - Peirce

KW - Picture theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870439750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870439750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/sem-2012-0083

DO - 10.1515/sem-2012-0083

M3 - Article

VL - 2012

SP - 251

EP - 261

JO - Semiotica

JF - Semiotica

SN - 0037-1998

IS - 192

ER -